Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

351 Cleveland in 96 f-150???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-20-2012, 05:55 AM
andrewskevich's Avatar
andrewskevich
andrewskevich is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
351 Cleveland in 96 f-150???

I might have the opportunity to put a cleveland in my truck, and since my engine is almost toast, i'm in need of a new one. I get 11-12.7 mpg right now, on a FI 302 w/ 5-speed, would a cleveland get me better mileage? (highway)

tnx - Andrew
 
  #2  
Old 06-20-2012, 06:49 AM
cjben's Avatar
cjben
cjben is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Midwest
Posts: 6,335
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
are you sure you are talking about a 351 cleveland and not a 351 windsor? The reason I ask is because the cleveland hasn't been produced since sometime in the 1970's,and the windsor was produced into the late 90's. The cleveland was never fuel injected,so you will be running a stone age engine in your newer truck. The windsor was fuel injected from sometime in the late 80's up til the end of production in the late 90's. A 351 windsor would be almost a direct swap into your truck,whereas the cleveland will require a new transmission as well as other things.
 
  #3  
Old 06-20-2012, 07:02 AM
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel
SCRebel is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Conway, South Carolina
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cjben- The EFI 5.8 (351w) was produced from 1988-1997. And in 97 it just came in the F250.

If you can find a 351w to swap in you will be very very happy verses your 302. You'll have more power, and get better mpg. It uses the same trans, wiring harness, injectors, throttle body, water pump, timing chain cover, valve covers, and belt brackets. Difference b/t the 5.0 and 5.8 are upper and lower intake and fuel rail.
 
  #4  
Old 06-20-2012, 08:09 AM
El Camino Man's Avatar
El Camino Man
El Camino Man is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Southeastern IL
Posts: 4,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SCRebel
Difference b/t the 5.0 and 5.8 are upper and lower intake and fuel rail.
Then wheres the .8L come from lol
 
  #5  
Old 06-20-2012, 08:27 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes on 763 Posts
Originally Posted by andrewskevich
I get 11-12.7 mpg right now,
You have sensor problems which are pretty easy to fix with the on-board diagnostics available on this truck, so get your test port functional and go from there.

Originally Posted by andrewskevich
would a cleveland get me better mileage? (highway)
No.
 
  #6  
Old 06-20-2012, 09:38 AM
El Camino Man's Avatar
El Camino Man
El Camino Man is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Southeastern IL
Posts: 4,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes a 351C would give you better than 12 but if you fixed your 302, it would more than likely get better than the 351C
 
  #7  
Old 06-20-2012, 09:58 AM
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel
SCRebel is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Conway, South Carolina
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by El Camino Man
Then wheres the .8L come from lol
Haha. Ok let my specify. In accessories attached to the 5.0 and 5.8 the difference is the upper/lower intake and fuel rail.

We all know the 351w has a longer stroke that gives it the .8L. And if you want to get technical a 351w is not a 351w, its a 352w.
 
  #8  
Old 06-20-2012, 10:01 AM
El Camino Man's Avatar
El Camino Man
El Camino Man is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Southeastern IL
Posts: 4,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lol! I knew whatcha meant. Just had to give ya some crap
 
  #9  
Old 06-20-2012, 10:23 AM
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel
SCRebel is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Conway, South Carolina
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah I figured. But hey, someone has to keep me on my toes. Lol
 
  #10  
Old 06-20-2012, 10:53 AM
andrewskevich's Avatar
andrewskevich
andrewskevich is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
definitely a cleveland

So, the rational was that I have access to a cleveland (2v), but I'd have to go source a windsor.
I'm pretty sure the engine is tired, not a "sensor problem". It has 372000 km, and if I park on a slope and leave it in gear, it will just roll right down the little slope, with barely slowing down.

So, engine is dying (it also goes through oil like crazy), and I need to put something else in my truck. I thought about finding a little diesel out of a delivery truck (like a pepsi truck), but think that'd probably take too much effort to make work. The cleveland looks like it'd be fun to do, and I'm pretty sure some trucks in the 70's came with them, but if it's not gonna get me better mileage, I won't bother.

Other than a windsor, is there anything else I should consider? It doesn't have to be a (gasp) ford engine... After all, I have a kubota diesel in my john deere garden tractor. ....

Any suggestions?
 
  #11  
Old 06-20-2012, 10:58 AM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is online now
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,586
Received 1,164 Likes on 919 Posts
  #12  
Old 06-20-2012, 12:02 PM
andym's Avatar
andym
andym is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bonita Springs FL
Posts: 19,402
Received 27 Likes on 27 Posts
Just get a 351w instead. It will be a ton of work to fit a 351c into your truck. Bellhousing pattern, motor mounts, exhaust, etc. are all different and the mounts and exhaust will have to be custom. You will need a new transmission altogether and if it's an electronic transmission, how are you going to get a carb motor, a PCM, and an electronic trans all talking to each other?

Unless you are really experienced in fabrication and custom work, I would go with what's going to be easiest.
 
  #13  
Old 06-20-2012, 12:23 PM
big vann's Avatar
big vann
big vann is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: BC Cana'duh
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
351C has the same bellhousing bolt pattern as a 351W/302.The 351M has the same bellhousing bolt pattern as the 429/460.The 351M and 351C share the same heads,dizzy(not sure what else).That aside,don't waste your time with the cleveland,it's designed for a lighter car.You'll be way ahead with a 351 Windsor engine.They are plentiful and generally inexpensive.
 
  #14  
Old 06-20-2012, 12:42 PM
andrewskevich's Avatar
andrewskevich
andrewskevich is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a 5-speed, and I understand I'd need a different fuel pump. But truck is rwd, so not too heavy, and father-in-law IS extremely experienced in fabricating (it's his cleveland), and he suggested doing the switch. Not considering the work involved, is it just a bad idea? I always thought clevelands were a pretty good engine. And father figured in my truck it'd get pretty good mileage.
 
  #15  
Old 06-20-2012, 12:48 PM
El Camino Man's Avatar
El Camino Man
El Camino Man is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Southeastern IL
Posts: 4,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I looked up some specs on the internet and although Im not 100% positive, the 302 and 351C are just a hair apart when it comes to HP and TQ. You wouldnt lose anything putting it in there.
 


Quick Reply: 351 Cleveland in 96 f-150???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 PM.