Can we just delete this 4.4 section? - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums

Go Back  Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > 3.0L Powerstroke Diesel
Reload this Page >

Can we just delete this 4.4 section?

Notices
3.0L Powerstroke Diesel Discuss the forthcoming 3.0L V6 Ford diesel in the F150

Can we just delete this 4.4 section?

  #1  
Old 04-05-2012, 06:12 PM
parkland
parkland is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,128
parkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud of
Can we just delete this 4.4 section?

It seems like this was intended for a 4.4 l diesel for the f150 or SUV's but it just never happened.
 
  #2  
Old 04-05-2012, 10:17 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 23,476
Tom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputation
I tried a couple weeks ago, and the decision was made to keep it around for a future small diesel.
 
  #3  
Old 04-09-2012, 10:39 AM
03 SVT VERT
03 SVT VERT is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 451
03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.
Originally Posted by parkland View Post
It seems like this was intended for a 4.4 l diesel for the f150 or SUV's but it just never happened.
Technically, it did happen. Land Rover is using Ford's 4.4L diesel in the Range Rover in Europe. Unfortunately, we don't get it stateside. Kind of a shame since it's supposedly a very nice engine. It makes 308hp and 516ft-lbs of tq in Range Rover trim.
 
  #4  
Old 05-02-2012, 07:24 PM
FORDF250HDXLT's Avatar
FORDF250HDXLT
FORDF250HDXLT is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maine/Oklahoma
Posts: 17,113
FORDF250HDXLT has a superb reputationFORDF250HDXLT has a superb reputationFORDF250HDXLT has a superb reputationFORDF250HDXLT has a superb reputationFORDF250HDXLT has a superb reputationFORDF250HDXLT has a superb reputationFORDF250HDXLT has a superb reputationFORDF250HDXLT has a superb reputationFORDF250HDXLT has a superb reputationFORDF250HDXLT has a superb reputationFORDF250HDXLT has a superb reputation
holy crap.that would actually make a good optional diesel engine for the f250/350 trucks imho.
ford is payed by big oil not to offer it here in the states no doubt.
 
  #5  
Old 05-02-2012, 09:41 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 23,476
Tom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputation
Originally Posted by FORDF250HDXLT View Post
ford is payed by big oil not to offer it here in the states no doubt.




I love conspiracy theories.

 
  #6  
Old 05-03-2012, 01:34 AM
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK
MisterCMK is offline
Avid Winter Hater
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rogers, MN
Posts: 23,975
MisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputation
Originally Posted by Crazy001 View Post


I love conspiracy theories.

And bad spelling. Lol
 
  #7  
Old 05-03-2012, 08:28 AM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 5,858
seventyseven250 has a brilliant futureseventyseven250 has a brilliant futureseventyseven250 has a brilliant futureseventyseven250 has a brilliant futureseventyseven250 has a brilliant futureseventyseven250 has a brilliant futureseventyseven250 has a brilliant futureseventyseven250 has a brilliant futureseventyseven250 has a brilliant futureseventyseven250 has a brilliant futureseventyseven250 has a brilliant future
I work for "big oil" and we're doing everything we can to encourage fleet users to switch to Natural gas. Trust me, the oil companies aren't worried about oil demand.

These days now that gasoline engines are available with turbo and direct injection, the economy gap with diesel is pretty small. Why buy a 4.4 diesel for an F150 when you can have the ecoboost?
 
  #8  
Old 05-04-2012, 05:44 PM
03 SVT VERT
03 SVT VERT is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 451
03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.
Originally Posted by seventyseven250 View Post
Why buy a 4.4 diesel for an F150 when you can have the ecoboost?
Lots of reasons. It would be nice if we had the choice of a diesel or ecoboost, instead of the choice being made for us.
 
  #9  
Old 05-06-2012, 06:35 PM
arizonasuperduty007
arizonasuperduty007 is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
arizonasuperduty007 is starting off with a positive reputation.
While gas is now direct injection in many vehicles, it still is young and still requires spark plugs. I really like my V10 and it would be better if it were direct injection. The fact is Diesel has more BTU's per gallon than does gasoline, that's where the economy is. I know this is rather direct from a new username, but diesel engines are getting better with time as well.
 
  #10  
Old 05-06-2012, 06:37 PM
arizonasuperduty007
arizonasuperduty007 is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
arizonasuperduty007 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I would love for smaller trucks to have a diesel in them. I was hoping for it a few years back. I would probably buy an f150 if it had a diesel.
 
  #11  
Old 05-06-2012, 08:43 PM
parkland
parkland is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,128
parkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by arizonasuperduty007 View Post
The fact is Diesel has more BTU's per gallon than does gasoline, that's where the economy is.

Economy? What economy? Diesel has been consistently costing more than gas, and a diesel trucks costs a ton more to buy and look after ?!?
Would you buy an f150 for a family vehicle with DPF, urea, EGR, etc ? I wouldn't.

I would consider swapping a pre-emissions diesel into an f150, but this new technology is insane, and not cost effective unless you drive a ton of miles.

IMHO, for diesel trucks to become a huge asset again, they either need to get more reliable, cheaper, or the price of diesel needs to go way down. Do any of those things sound like reality?
 
  #12  
Old 05-06-2012, 11:54 PM
arizonasuperduty007
arizonasuperduty007 is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
arizonasuperduty007 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I agree that diesel is a whole lot more and regulations are killing it. Wow, I think the only way it could seem like you hate diesel any more would be if you typed all caps.

There is a reason that diesel (when you compare the same size gas and diesel engines) get better fuel mileage, it is because of the btu's per gallon of diesel versus per gallon of gasoline. It's basically the same with gasoline and methanol (or other alcoholic fuels). You are correct in your summation that the economy of diesel has been eroded with all the new reg's and equipment combined with the higher price for diesel. That is why my dad hasn't been taking his boat out as often (he has the 6.0 powerstroke in his F250) and when he does, it's not as far.

When you look at towing, diesel engines have the advantage over gasoline engines with the amount of torque they produce (again the btu's per gallon). For most American's, diesel is of no real advantage unless you are looking at bio diesel. However, for myself a diesel would be better for me because I have been towing a lot. I wasn't towing much last year, however in the last couple of months business has picked up to where I actually use the capabilities of my truck. I currently have a V10, and a 7.3 diesel would really help getting up those hills with a full load. When I do buy my next truck, it will probably be a 2001 or older truck, mainly because the 7.3 is a more reliable engine (imo).

Sorry for the length of my post.
 
  #13  
Old 05-07-2012, 10:44 AM
JIM_C's Avatar
JIM_C
JIM_C is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tucker, GA
Posts: 596
JIM_C is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.JIM_C is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I see that the military is prototyping the 4.4.
FED Bravo is a hybrid vision of the next Humvee | Fox News
 
  #14  
Old 06-17-2012, 09:14 AM
ruschejj's Avatar
ruschejj
ruschejj is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Greenwood, SC
Posts: 6,663
ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.
Give me a 4.10 rear end and an 8 speed manual in my 2013 F350SRW and I would order it Monday.

Literally, we don't NEED more power. We need economy, reliability, clean diesels. Gimme max boost in every gear at 1400 rpm and I will be just fine. Smaller engine, work it easy with gearing, makes better longevity and economy. (at least I think it would)
 
  #15  
Old 06-17-2012, 02:23 PM
parkland
parkland is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,128
parkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud of
Maybe a 4.4l in an f250, not a SD, but just an f250.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Can we just delete this 4.4 section?


Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

© 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: