Some help please....
#1
Some help please....
Finally getting started on my dad's 64 F100. I have decided to use the 302 out of a 94 Mustang I have here on the shelf. My question is, I need an intake, carb, mild cam and distributor/ignition set up.
Has swapped one of these over? (EFI to Carb). Anyone done this same engine in somewhat the same truck. The F100 will have a C6 behind it, and I have not decided on rear end gears, nothing to radical though. I dont need a huge cam, just something to get it up and go, looking to make around 300 horsies. Would also like to get around 18mpg as dad wont drive it if it dont get decent mileage.
Thanx in advance.
This will be my first swap, but I have done many head gaskets and intakes, but I really need to know what to get for the right set up the first time so everything works together not against.
Has swapped one of these over? (EFI to Carb). Anyone done this same engine in somewhat the same truck. The F100 will have a C6 behind it, and I have not decided on rear end gears, nothing to radical though. I dont need a huge cam, just something to get it up and go, looking to make around 300 horsies. Would also like to get around 18mpg as dad wont drive it if it dont get decent mileage.
Thanx in advance.
This will be my first swap, but I have done many head gaskets and intakes, but I really need to know what to get for the right set up the first time so everything works together not against.
#2
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 963 Likes
on
762 Posts
No need for a cam change the stock HO cam is pretty good and reportedly works quite well(produces good power) with a carb and also returns decent milage when you're not on the hammer... .though 18mpg in a truck with a 3spd trans will require 3.00 axle gearing, and even then you may be stretching your luck.
#3
#5
Are they factory shorty headers ?
I have only seen half a dozen factory shorties but those were misleading as they were very restrictive with small openings . Cheap mass production in my opinion and would not flow much better if any over cast iron manifolds .
Maybe I am missing something or just saw a few of the exceptions ?
I have only seen half a dozen factory shorties but those were misleading as they were very restrictive with small openings . Cheap mass production in my opinion and would not flow much better if any over cast iron manifolds .
Maybe I am missing something or just saw a few of the exceptions ?
#6
300 HP at the flywheel is achievable with the stock cam. A performer, performer RPM or performer RPM air-gap. I would recommend long tube headers for more than one reason. I'm no expert on carbs so I'll pass on that.
The transmission is notorious for robbing horsepower, any chance you could get a C4 or better yet a AOD? With the overdrive you can have gears and mileage.
The transmission is notorious for robbing horsepower, any chance you could get a C4 or better yet a AOD? With the overdrive you can have gears and mileage.
Last edited by Terpfords; 03-27-2012 at 05:57 PM. Reason: Accedental paste
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gatsby
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
4
07-17-2003 08:40 PM
gdavis2265
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
5
03-27-2002 08:57 AM