1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

Another SLICK follows me home!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 02-01-2012, 10:10 AM
Buzz44's Avatar
Buzz44
Buzz44 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: colbert washington
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Man that is a survivor. That looks to clean to be true. How do you do it?
 
  #17  
Old 02-02-2012, 08:11 PM
RJP66F100's Avatar
RJP66F100
RJP66F100 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: AR
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Boss9F100
So what did you pick up for the mustang project? details details . . .

It's just a 90 coupe...sorry to get your hopes up...lol
I've always wanted a 69 or 70 fastback but I don't guess it's ever gonna happen.

My 4th foxbody, I've had a 87 GT auto, 91 GT stick (for 13 years) and a 84 coupe that I 429'd.
Still undecided on what this 90 is gonna get for a V8.
 
  #18  
Old 02-03-2012, 12:32 AM
H K's Avatar
H K
H K is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice! What did you use to get it so clean?
 
  #19  
Old 02-03-2012, 10:12 AM
Boss9F100's Avatar
Boss9F100
Boss9F100 is offline
Logistics Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: PHX AZ
Posts: 3,561
Received 266 Likes on 178 Posts
Originally Posted by Buzz44
Man that is a survivor. That looks to clean to be true. How do you do it?
Originally Posted by H K
Nice! What did you use to get it so clean?
Typical Arizona truck. Just hosed it off to take out all the cobwebs.

This truck spent its first few months in Seattle area before going to phoenix.
 
  #20  
Old 02-03-2012, 11:38 AM
Rusty_Old_F250's Avatar
Rusty_Old_F250
Rusty_Old_F250 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Probably a good thing that truck got out of here and went to Arizona. My 73 lived it's entire life in and around Seattle, and the frame isn't half that nice.

Sam
 
  #21  
Old 02-04-2012, 12:08 AM
jhooch's Avatar
jhooch
jhooch is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by KingBigJoe
If like to deal with all of that wiring to put an ecoboost in it... go right ahead. But, personally I wouldn't do that. I'd rather have a carb than efi anyday of the week.
I disagree. When EFI first started coming out it was taboo, no one knew about it, everyone was a afraid of it. There hasn't been a car sold in America since 1991 (Subaru Justy) with a carburetor. EFI is now the mainstream. Plug and play wiring harnesses (while probably not for the ECOBOOST yet) are becoming the norm making swapping EFI engines into older cars cake. You can buy a crate BOSS 302 (5.0 liter modular) complete with harness and all from Ford Racing. I'm looking into mod motor swaps for a couple of my older Fords. I glory in the idea of not having to mess with a carburetor. Now before the purists jump all over me, I wouldn't swap a mod motor into a factory Cobra Jet car or R code Galaxie, but my '64 260 powered Fairlane 2-dr post is screaming for that new Coyote 5.0.
 
  #22  
Old 02-04-2012, 05:20 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by Boss9F100
Seriously thinking about dropping in a twin turbo eco-boost in this truck. What does everyone think of that idea?


Some truck peeps are going nutso over this engine, installed in F150's beginning with the 2011's. They're also gullible, believing FoMoCo's (EPA) exaggerated MPG claims...forgetting that their mileage will vary.

But, when you consider that these new F150's can weigh over three tons, and...

The fact that the Eco Boost's puny V6 is about 216 cid, that turbo's have a nasty habit of getting clogged up with carbon, how long will this engine hold up in these oversized tubs?!

The salesman I bought the tub in my sig pic from, began the Eco Boost sales pitch the second I told him what I wanted.

But, he never got past his first sentence, cuz I told him the F150's gotta have the 5.0L .. or I'll buy a new Tundra w/the DOHC 5.7L. He never mentioned the Eco Boost again.
 
  #23  
Old 02-04-2012, 06:08 AM
camperspecial65's Avatar
camperspecial65
camperspecial65 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: seattle
Posts: 4,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Very good points Bill on the turbos...As to the MPG claims...note the lawsuit a consumer took against Honda...and won...That was on the tele this week.
As to the new toy..nice find...you are nearly at a truck for every day of the week...quite the fuel bill :-) But the looks make it worth it I suspect...



- cs65
 
  #24  
Old 02-04-2012, 10:55 AM
Boss9F100's Avatar
Boss9F100
Boss9F100 is offline
Logistics Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: PHX AZ
Posts: 3,561
Received 266 Likes on 178 Posts
Originally Posted by jhooch
I disagree. When EFI first started coming out it was taboo, no one knew about it, everyone was a afraid of it. There hasn't been a car sold in America since 1991 (Subaru Justy) with a carburetor. EFI is now the mainstream. Plug and play wiring harnesses (while probably not for the ECOBOOST yet) are becoming the norm making swapping EFI engines into older cars cake. You can buy a crate BOSS 302 (5.0 liter modular) complete with harness and all from Ford Racing. I'm looking into mod motor swaps for a couple of my older Fords. I glory in the idea of not having to mess with a carburetor. Now before the purists jump all over me, I wouldn't swap a mod motor into a factory Cobra Jet car or R code Galaxie, but my '64 260 powered Fairlane 2-dr post is screaming for that new Coyote 5.0.
I own 5 of these trucks right now and all FE powered. Boring! Fuel mileage in typical driving around 10mpg. Longer distances 12-14mpg maybe. 3 of them have 4.10 gearing and two 3.50 gears. I have a hot Rod 427 powered f100 and a nice original 352 along with the 352 powered Ranger. That gives me two more to do something different with and make it much more long trip friendly.

After having my '96 Ranger I bought new and powered by a EFI'd supercharged 5.0 and getting almost double the mileage of a 4 popper the EFI really made sense.

Originally Posted by NumberDummy


Some truck peeps are going nutso over this engine, installed in F150's beginning with the 2011's. They're also gullible, believing FoMoCo's (EPA) exaggerated MPG claims...forgetting that their mileage will vary.
ND, Remember this is no longer 1962 its 2012 and technology has come a long way in the last few years. When I first heard of ford going v-6 i laughed too. I am not laughing anymore!

But, when you consider that these new F150's can weigh over three tons, and...

The fact that the Eco Boost's puny V6 is about 216 cid, that turbo's have a nasty habit of getting clogged up with carbon, how long will this engine hold up in these oversized tubs?! Please explain the new turbo getting clogged with carbon . . . LOL. Do you realize its direct injection and the turbo's are water cooled? It may be small in size but out performs the rest of Fords gas engine lineup. A couple weekends ago I went to the B-J auction and to Fords tent where they were giving test drives. Waiting in line they asked what I wanted to drive. I told them a ecoboost. when walking up to the ecoboost explorer they guy mentioned it was a 4cyl. I laughed out loud and was then looking for something with the 3.5 but thought to be open and humor the poor guy I would take it for a spin just to get a few chuckles.I stopped at the stopsign on track to give the car in front time to go. i stomped it to floor and much to my amazement it took off with all 4 tires trying to lose grip. Lets just say if the traction control would not have been on I would have been sideways into the first corner. Thats the first time since my turbo t-bird a 4cyl has ever put a smile on my face! I walked away being quite impressed.They allowed me a 2nd lap and I chose a 5.0 F150. not nearly as impressed as the 4 popper

The salesman I bought the tub in my sig pic from, began the Eco Boost sales pitch the second I told him what I wanted.

But, he never got past his first sentence, cuz I told him the F150's gotta have the 5.0L .. or I'll buy a new Tundra w/the DOHC 5.7L. He never mentioned the Eco Boost again.
ND, By what you say its pretty obvious to me you do not know that much about the new eco-boost engines and you need to be a bit more open about them. They totally spank the 5.0 in performance and mileage, they will tow 11,300 lbs. Local 2 friends who are brothers bought twin trucks one with a 5.0 one with a eco-boost. The ecoboost gets much better mileage and makes more power especially down low where you need it. The 1 with 5.0 loves the sound but if he had to do it over again would go with the ecoboost.


Originally Posted by camperspecial65
Very good points Bill on the turbos...As to the MPG claims...note the lawsuit a consumer took against Honda...and won...That was on the tele this week.
As to the new toy..nice find...you are nearly at a truck for every day of the week...quite the fuel bill :-) But the looks make it worth it I suspect...



- cs65
I am actually looking for a ecoboost 3.5 to put in one of my trucks. After driving the 4cyl ecoboost there is no doubt in my mind if I had an old smaller car or truck would consider swapping one of them too.

EFI for me as it really is much better. . . I can see it now. A slick with a factory 3.15 gear and double overdrive and a 3.5L TT getting 25mpg plus on highway. Easy double over the gas pig FE's. Dont get me wrong I love the FE engines along with the 385 series but its no longer the 60's.

Its a no brainer for me as to which truck I would drive more especially if going more than about 15miles each way. Power of a v-8 and mileage of a 6.

90% of its torque at just 1500rpm. Who can argue with that? Only part left to figure out is to make it AWD or not . . . I spoke with a Ford guy and was told If I bought a new engine I would get the warranty too. Slick with a warranty, I like it. 25mpg and a 13 second quarter mile in a Slick. Whats not to like?
 
  #25  
Old 02-04-2012, 12:39 PM
Bill W's Avatar
Bill W
Bill W is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 11,564
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Quote (ND, By what you say its pretty obvious to me you do not know that much about the new eco-boost engines) snip...


He owns one! i am sure he knows what he is talking about.

And Randy, l am kind of tired of you banging on Bill every chance you get....you know the saying, if you dont have something nice to say...
 
  #26  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:23 PM
Wyatt66f100's Avatar
Wyatt66f100
Wyatt66f100 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Hey guys though i would chime in with what i know about them as im a ford tech. The new eco boost is impressive in the fact that it has more power then a normal v6 at low end torque. speaking from experience i had the ford training class on this engine and was told that it had a sizable boost leak on my test drive and still hauled me along pretty good. The eco boost has been the most noticeable on the boadcast messages as to small little things that are wrong with it. as most new engineered engines do in the first year. off the top of my head these are the ones i have seen and remember reading about:

1. random intermittant misfires can be contributed to early spark plug failure and require replacement of the effected plug. I had one not too long ago that was misfireing due to it being fouled. apparently for had found that it has the same problem as the 6.4l diesel. the intercoolers are too effeciant in cold temps condensating the air into water and fouling plugs when the water enters the engine. i believe there is a intercooler being redesigned as we speak.
 
  #27  
Old 02-04-2012, 02:38 PM
Pickupmanx2's Avatar
Pickupmanx2
Pickupmanx2 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Near Yosemite CA
Posts: 4,277
Received 239 Likes on 184 Posts
Sorry to hear that,,, you do know,, it is an incurable disease!!
I have Slickitis, Bumpitis, AND Dentitis,,,, the doctors have given up,,, and I think it is genetic,,, it was passed down to me,,, the severity may vary,, but it is there,,, but as I tell my wife,, it is way better than any other communicable disease out there!!

Congrats on the Slick,, and sorry to hear about your condition

Originally Posted by Boss9F100
Seems every time I get up a few bucks to work on one another follows me home.
Sickness for sure. I call it Slickisitis.
 
  #28  
Old 02-04-2012, 03:03 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by Boss9F100

ND, By what you say its pretty obvious to me you do not know that much about the new eco-boost engines and you need to be a bit more open about them.
That's my point, the Eco is new to the market, so it has no history of possible problematic issues and won't have for a coupla years. Some peeps are nutso about it, only due to FoMoCo hype.

And, when one considers that 3.5L is about 216 cid, and the fact that FoMoCo is installing Eco's in three ton trucks, how long will they hold up?

November 13, 2010, FoMoCo had a test drive comparo at AutoClub Speedway in Fontana (the parking lot was used, not the track ). New F150 3.5L V6 Eco, 3.7L V6, 5.0L & 6.2L V8's vs the Ram, Chevy and GMC.

There were no Tundra's or Titan's there (both have DOHC 32 valve V8's), which I though was ridiculous. Guess FoMoCo only wanted to comparo against ancient technology "cam in block" engines.

I drove the F150 5.0L, was impressed. The 2004 F150 Lariat I owned (previous to the three Titans I've owned), had the 5.4L. Its get up and go...got up and went.

I didn't drive the Eco, because IMO, it will not hold up in a three ton truck. 'Course, I buy something new every coupla years, but still...

You asked for peeps opinions and I gave you mine. Sorry you disagree, but that's the way things are.

If everyone agreed, maybe we wouldn't be stuck with Pelosi, Obama, Gov Moonbeam, open mouth-insert foot Biden and other left wing liberals.
 
  #29  
Old 02-04-2012, 03:14 PM
1972RedNeck's Avatar
1972RedNeck
1972RedNeck is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Townsend, MT
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
If everyone agreed, we wouldn't be stuck with Pelosi, Obama, Gov Moonbeam, Michael Moore, notFondaJane and other left wing liberals.
I'll agree with that.
 
  #30  
Old 02-04-2012, 04:34 PM
Boss9F100's Avatar
Boss9F100
Boss9F100 is offline
Logistics Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: PHX AZ
Posts: 3,561
Received 266 Likes on 178 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill W
Quote (ND, By what you say its pretty obvious to me you do not know that much about the new eco-boost engines) snip...


He owns one! i am sure he knows what he is talking about.

And Randy, l am kind of tired of you banging on Bill every chance you get....you know the saying, if you dont have something nice to say...

I was referring to his comment about the turbo's carboning up and because the trucks can weight in at 6k lbs the engine is too small to hold up.

Its very clear he does in fact not own a eco-boost anything.
Its a civil disagreement, his opinion vs mine. He had a very strong opinion on them without ever haven driven or owned one. A simple correction and maybe be a little open to these small cu in engines and turbo's. Obviously TODAY for Fomoco. In a couple years 50% of fords veh model line or more will have a eco-boost something avail. It could be more than that right now.
 


Quick Reply: Another SLICK follows me home!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 AM.