Ecoboosters with 3.73 rear end, what MPG are you getting?
#16
so i take it when you first get your eco boost the mileage is kinda not good and gets better after a few miles. What should i be really for??
I will be getting my eco boost with 3.73 in January hope fully sooner!! so i will be getting the "winter" blend of fuel. so that doesnt help the mpg's and i guess some summer with a few miles on it and summer blend I hope to be good to go!!
I will be getting my eco boost with 3.73 in January hope fully sooner!! so i will be getting the "winter" blend of fuel. so that doesnt help the mpg's and i guess some summer with a few miles on it and summer blend I hope to be good to go!!
The worst things you can do to hurt mpg are:
1. drive fast
2. make jack rabbit starts
3. drive into a strong headwind
3. add a topper or larger tires with more aggressive tread
4. load the truck up with 1000 lbs of bull bars, headache racks, toolboxes and tools.
5. Don't tow anything as your mpg will drop like a rock. 9-15 depending upon load, wind resistance and your speed.
#17
#18
I like synthetic oil as I use a lot of Amsoil and Mobil 1 in my small engines, Atv and Tractor. I have gone back and fourth. I decided to stick to Motorcraft synthetic blend. Ford Stands behind this oil and says 10k. so what I do is 5k. I believe oil gets dirty before it wears out. So no matter if i am buying $10 a quart Amsoil or $13 a gal at Wally world I do not believe i am getting any better protection. Ford uses top quaility Base oils. Matter of fact I am using this oil in my Hyundai and Toyota cars as well.
#19
#21
#22
15 highway 13.5 to 14 city with 2004 5.4. 4wd crewcab. Doing some math, if I were to upgrade to the much advertised "ecoboost" for another 30,000 dollars or so, gaining the massive 4 MPG, (being generous) at 3.40 per gallon gas locally, I can pay it off in 84 years. (7500 miles per year driving.)
#23
15 highway 13.5 to 14 city with 2004 5.4. 4wd crewcab. Doing some math, if I were to upgrade to the much advertised "ecoboost" for another 30,000 dollars or so, gaining the massive 4 MPG, (being generous) at 3.40 per gallon gas locally, I can pay it off in 84 years. (7500 miles per year driving.)
#24
Sweat?
Cool! What are you towing? I typically don't tow anything. I just like big pickups, so I can intimidate and keep all the other A-holes on their cellphones from running over me.
Just seems with the barrage of advertising that Ford is currently up to pushing the "ecoboost" concept as some sort of ecological god send with the 3 or 4 mpg improvement over the last generation of motors is a load of fluff. I still like Ford though. Just quit watching the commercials. Of course, Mike Rowe has proven to be an adept "**** shoveler".
Just seems with the barrage of advertising that Ford is currently up to pushing the "ecoboost" concept as some sort of ecological god send with the 3 or 4 mpg improvement over the last generation of motors is a load of fluff. I still like Ford though. Just quit watching the commercials. Of course, Mike Rowe has proven to be an adept "**** shoveler".
#25
15 highway 13.5 to 14 city with 2004 5.4. 4wd crewcab. Doing some math, if I were to upgrade to the much advertised "ecoboost" for another 30,000 dollars or so, gaining the massive 4 MPG, (being generous) at 3.40 per gallon gas locally, I can pay it off in 84 years. (7500 miles per year driving.)
In most cases (almost always) it makes no sense to trade a car for better fuel consumption only.
#26
Fact check
Current rig 2004 with 75000 miles. Trade in value est. 16000. Manufacturers list on equal 2011 rig, with the "ecoboost" Lariat package with bells and whistles. 45000. Pretty darn close to 30,000. And 16000 and nothing are a considerable distance apart. My original point being a 10 to 20 % improvement in MPG isn't worth 30,000 dollars. Of course you can argue with a newer trade in you will spend 15000 less. So it's a 40 year improvement in payback. And you are correct, mpg comparisons in a full size pickup forum are kind of silly. If you want fuel economy you aren't buying a pickup.
#27
I'm getting around 16 mpg, that's just going to work and back, I've noticed mpg getting worse due to warm up, I can see 15's in the future.
I can't drive truck any easier
I like my truck, I understand I have the worst combo for getting decent mpg
4x4, 3.73, 20" wheels
Hopefuly as engine gets some miles my mileage gets better
I can't drive truck any easier
I like my truck, I understand I have the worst combo for getting decent mpg
4x4, 3.73, 20" wheels
Hopefuly as engine gets some miles my mileage gets better
#28
#29
Overall tho for as much power as it has, I'm not complaining about the mpg since I'm going faster and using a lower rear end than what hte EPA tested with. This engine has the potential for great fuel economy, it just varies so much with weather, wind, roads, and of course how much you want to have fun.
#30
So if Ford rates the 6.2L with 3.73 as follows...
4x2 13 city, 18 hwy
4x4 12 city, 16 hwy
Do you attribute most of the loss in fuel economy (when compared with more commonly found 3.55-equipped Ecoboosts rated at 16 city/22 hwy in 4x2 or 15/21 in 4x4) to the larger/heavier/thirstier 6.2L motor, or the 3.73 gears, or equal doses of both?
4x2 13 city, 18 hwy
4x4 12 city, 16 hwy
Do you attribute most of the loss in fuel economy (when compared with more commonly found 3.55-equipped Ecoboosts rated at 16 city/22 hwy in 4x2 or 15/21 in 4x4) to the larger/heavier/thirstier 6.2L motor, or the 3.73 gears, or equal doses of both?