1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

1999 7.3 upgrading to 2003 reduction starter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 04-06-2011, 11:23 AM
SpringerPop's Avatar
SpringerPop
SpringerPop is offline
Hotshot

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: La La Land
Posts: 17,986
Received 188 Likes on 112 Posts
Originally Posted by fast_st
Could well be a PLGR!
It is. It's a PLGR.

There's another current thread here that might make interesting reading for you:
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...-question.html

Pop
 
  #17  
Old 04-07-2011, 11:24 AM
fast_st's Avatar
fast_st
fast_st is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern MA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Definately interesting reading Pop, I have both starters, will have the OEM one rebuilt by a local shop that I have do all my rebuilds for the fire dept for the past 20 years or so. I'm all about having serviceable spare parts on hand.

I'm willing to eat the investment for science, does it spin faster?

Will get some resistance checks, voltage drop, amp draw and rpm data to help fill in all the blanks that exist in just about every post on the subject.

Also an excuse to use some snazzy tools. That's for next week, then a 1400 mile test drive to help a friend pick up an rv.
 
  #18  
Old 04-07-2011, 02:42 PM
SpringerPop's Avatar
SpringerPop
SpringerPop is offline
Hotshot

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: La La Land
Posts: 17,986
Received 188 Likes on 112 Posts
So that means that after the Mitsubishi's rebuild that you'll also try it back in the truck for the same tests for comparison? That WOULD be ideal!

And, as you say, fill in some specifics for the knowledge base here.

Pop
 
  #19  
Old 04-07-2011, 02:46 PM
fast_st's Avatar
fast_st
fast_st is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern MA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SpringerPop
So that means that after the Mitsubishi's rebuild that you'll also try it back in the truck for the same tests for comparison? That WOULD be ideal!

And, as you say, fill in some specifics for the knowledge base here.

Pop
Definately, its only a few minutes to swap. My present starter seems fine but its got 200k on it and its on its third set of batteries so that'd be two instances of starting on low batteries multiple times, can't be good for it.
 
  #20  
Old 04-13-2011, 08:18 AM
fast_st's Avatar
fast_st
fast_st is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern MA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Swapped out the starter first notes:

Cranking speed cold seems a little faster maybe 5%
cranking speed hot seems about 20% faster

Amperage is hard to tell, its all over the place at 280-300 amps for both starters, I think I need to cobble up an inductive coil and attach it to the oscilloscope to get a better idea of the average draw.

Waiting on the laser tach to arrive still.
old starter is in the shop for an overhaul.
 
  #21  
Old 04-13-2011, 09:08 AM
SpringerPop's Avatar
SpringerPop
SpringerPop is offline
Hotshot

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: La La Land
Posts: 17,986
Received 188 Likes on 112 Posts
You indicated you were thinking it was time for new batteries, too. Have they been changed yet for this test?

Pop
 
  #22  
Old 04-13-2011, 09:20 AM
Nick 99's Avatar
Nick 99
Nick 99 is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: La Mesa, Ca.
Posts: 634
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Is there a way to measure the voltage at the starter at the same time (watts )that you measuring the current? How about measuring the temp of the motor and starter before each test?
 
  #23  
Old 04-13-2011, 01:15 PM
fast_st's Avatar
fast_st
fast_st is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern MA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SpringerPop
You indicated you were thinking it was time for new batteries, too. Have they been changed yet for this test?

Pop
You bet Pop, 2 new same date Motorcraft batteries, charged and tested before install, loctite sealer around the posts, posts and terminals scrubbed and polished, greased, new terminal bolts and everything torqued down.

Bad batteries and connections are the nemesis of diesel starters.



I'm planning on measuring voltage drop on both sides (+/-) to see if an
additional ground cable would be of use. I'll likely add one anyway, why run battery current through a dozen bolted connections.

Though if the resistance of the battery cable were accurately measured, the current flow could be measured by voltage drop.
 
  #24  
Old 08-29-2011, 02:29 PM
powerstrokerrr's Avatar
powerstrokerrr
powerstrokerrr is offline
New User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 7.3 putting 2000 model 7.3 starter

i have 2003 7.3 6 speed it orginally came out with 3 whole starter and it went out and i put the new 2 hole on it but it keeps breaking the ears off so i found 2000 modle that has the bolt hole will that work?? it looks all the same but the 2000 starter is a little longer
 
  #25  
Old 12-05-2011, 09:00 AM
fast_st's Avatar
fast_st
fast_st is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern MA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sounds like something more serious there, maybe there's a nick on the opening that's preventing proper alignment? I'm about to get around to doing rev checks on mine to see which is faster if either.
 
  #26  
Old 12-05-2011, 10:17 AM
SpringerPop's Avatar
SpringerPop
SpringerPop is offline
Hotshot

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: La La Land
Posts: 17,986
Received 188 Likes on 112 Posts
Originally Posted by powerstrokerrr
i have 2003 7.3 6 speed it orginally came out with 3 whole starter and it went out and i put the new 2 hole on it but it keeps breaking the ears off so i found 2000 modle that has the bolt hole will that work?? it looks all the same but the 2000 starter is a little longer
Yup. It should sure work for you.

If anything, you may have to dress the wire to it slightly differently, but that should be a virtual non-issue.

Just make sure you have a third bolt on hand to use. I'd use Grade 8's for all three. They're cheap enough. Use Grade 8 lock washers, too. Torque to spec, whatever that is.

Pop
 
  #27  
Old 07-09-2015, 01:32 AM
mario1987's Avatar
mario1987
mario1987 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
starter

so just reading the thread i have a zf6 trans and its a three hole starter, i wanna upgrade to a better one truck is a 2000 f350 chasis cab anyways, i wanna put either the 03 7.3 starter or the 03 6.0 starter. which would be the better fit and any mods to be made. reason i ask i have full charge on batteries and truck feels like it has no battery power to turn starter and ive replaced stock starter from oriely's 3 times now under their warrenty. its my main truck for work and i need it to be reliable.
 
  #28  
Old 07-09-2015, 04:44 AM
greg_8507's Avatar
greg_8507
greg_8507 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Onlsow, NC
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had the same problem with a couple AutoZone starters. Each one lasted a couple of months. They just kept gradually getting weaker, felt like they were getting turned by weak batteries. Put a Ford starter in, haven't had a problem for about a year and a half now. It's the stock 2 hole starter that they carry for the 7.3. Still turns over much faster than the AutoZone starters did new.
 
  #29  
Old 07-09-2015, 08:13 AM
mario1987's Avatar
mario1987
mario1987 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
These were the O'Riley's starters and are 3 hole I just don't want to spend money on starter for no reason
Originally Posted by greg_8507
I had the same problem with a couple AutoZone starters. Each one lasted a couple of months. They just kept gradually getting weaker, felt like they were getting turned by weak batteries. Put a Ford starter in, haven't had a problem for about a year and a half now. It's the stock 2 hole starter that they carry for the 7.3. Still turns over much faster than the AutoZone starters did new.
 
  #30  
Old 07-09-2015, 04:18 PM
greg_8507's Avatar
greg_8507
greg_8507 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Onlsow, NC
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like O'Rileys starters aren't holding up. I don't know what the difference between a Motocraft 7.3 starter vs Motocraft 6.0 starter, but the original Motocraft replacement vs the AutoZone replacement is night and day. There's a reason the other starters are so much cheaper.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ford2go
Garage & Workshop
28
03-26-2017 10:42 AM
gtadim
Excursion - King of SUVs
14
08-06-2016 10:12 PM
hivoltj
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
12
03-13-2016 06:28 PM
fightlivefree
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
23
01-26-2016 05:30 PM
tk1325
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
15
07-09-2015 12:20 AM



Quick Reply: 1999 7.3 upgrading to 2003 reduction starter



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 PM.