Modular V10 (6.8l)  

'03 v10 y-pipe, good or bad???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 08-10-2014, 06:51 PM
eternal_177's Avatar
eternal_177
eternal_177 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dkf
There was no 3V in 2003. The 3V did not come out until 2005 in the SD. Plus the y-pipe, converter portions, exhaust manifolds and etc on the 3V are different than the 2V trucks. If you have the stock ypipe that came on a 2003 V10 SD that is designed to reduce or eliminate exhaust flutter. The 1999- early 2000 y-pipes were a different design and had flutter.
I got it from a 2wd 03 and was told it was a 3v. It has no bottleneck in it. So I assumed the previous owner knew his stuff lol. I will try to get a vid up tomorrow. It sounds good tho, not loud at idle but it does kinda cackle above 2500.
 
  #32  
Old 08-10-2014, 08:00 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
He didn't know what he was talking about, no 3V came in an 03'.
 
  #33  
Old 08-18-2014, 05:25 PM
zoenemo1's Avatar
zoenemo1
zoenemo1 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So doing the why pipe will not help with more towing power?
 
  #34  
Old 08-19-2014, 09:11 AM
WE3ZS's Avatar
WE3ZS
WE3ZS is online now
World Famous Mod
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Media PA
Posts: 11,374
Received 830 Likes on 570 Posts
Originally Posted by zoenemo1
So doing the why pipe will not help with more towing power?

Replacing the stock T pipe with a good Y pipe will deliver a little more performance to help with towing chores, headers will be even better if you can fit the cost into your budget. Both should also make a very small MPG improvement, that can quickly disappear from the driver enjoying that new power boost!
 
  #35  
Old 08-19-2014, 10:16 AM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 297 Likes on 156 Posts
Doing just the y-pipe on the 2-valve V10 will definitely help low-end throttle response. It equates to a quicker application of torque whenever you hit the go-pedal.

Whether or not that helps overall towing heavy, I can't say. Empty, it makes a noticeable difference.

Just be aware you may get the well-known "flutter" - which to me just sounds like extra exhaust noise - good noise though
 
  #36  
Old 08-20-2014, 07:21 AM
Diamnd1's Avatar
Diamnd1
Diamnd1 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: TN
Posts: 1,206
Received 59 Likes on 47 Posts
I did the Y-pipe convert and definitely makes a difference at low rpm. I did have the flutter afterwards. I got the 5 star tuner with pipe as pkg deal. I waited a few days to see how just the pipe would make a difference before installing tunes. After programming with the 87 octane performance tune, flutter is barely noticable.
Truck runs great!!
 
  #37  
Old 08-20-2014, 08:00 AM
eternal_177's Avatar
eternal_177
eternal_177 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Diamnd1
I did the Y-pipe convert and definitely makes a difference at low rpm. I did have the flutter afterwards. I got the 5 star tuner with pipe as pkg deal. I waited a few days to see how just the pipe would make a difference before installing tunes. After programming with the 87 octane performance tune, flutter is barely noticable.
Truck runs great!!
You should run the performance tune and just tell it you have 91 octane then run regular gas. I picked up almost 2mpg in the city from 9.6 to anywhere from 10.8 to 11.2
 
  #38  
Old 08-26-2016, 12:05 PM
CharlyG's Avatar
CharlyG
CharlyG is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Hills, Ca.
Posts: 1,028
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by LSchicago2
If you have a 2 valve, you have the restrictive pipe. I replaced mine on the 03 I had, and it was much better on fuel.
I dunno, I have a 2 valve and I see no restrictions...





 
  #39  
Old 08-26-2016, 12:36 PM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 297 Likes on 156 Posts
You might have the original y-pipe that didn't have those restrictions at the "Y". The problem called "flutter" caused Ford to come out with the necked-down Y-pipe.

I think this was somewhere in the 2000 model year. My 2001 had the necked-down Y-pipe.
 
  #40  
Old 08-27-2016, 03:17 PM
R&T Babich's Avatar
R&T Babich
R&T Babich is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 0
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
Installed the SPD Y pipe on our 2003 all stock 3.73 a few months ago.
After 2k miles of towing gas mileage doesn't seem any better.
No change in exhaust sound, very quiet as always.
It has better low-end throttle response, get up and go, which makes it worth it at intersections when pulling a 7k trailer.
 
  #41  
Old 08-27-2016, 08:54 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by CharlyG
I dunno, I have a 2 valve and I see no restrictions...





That is the old "rams horn" y-pipe that came on 99' and some 2000 trucks. Ford later changed it to the the y-pipe with the two necked down sections to get rid of exhaust flutter. It got rid of the flutter, but it also got rid of some power.
 
  #42  
Old 08-28-2016, 11:53 AM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 297 Likes on 156 Posts
Originally Posted by R&T Babich
It has better low-end throttle response, get up and go, which makes it worth it at intersections when pulling a 7k trailer.
That's exactly my impression when I did mine. Better off-idle throttle response, but overall, NO improvement in high-end power.
 
  #43  
Old 08-28-2016, 12:54 PM
CharlyG's Avatar
CharlyG
CharlyG is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Hills, Ca.
Posts: 1,028
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
I noticed on 5 Star's site that they sell a replacement for the ram's horn style that I have(post 38). It doesn't look like there's much restriction??? I am thinking of giving them a call and hear their 'splanation.
 
  #44  
Old 08-29-2016, 05:13 AM
Im50fast's Avatar
Im50fast
Im50fast is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,084
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Someone should attempt to install an Econoline van Y in your trucks.
It appears to be some hot rod stuff- big piping, factory mandrel bent without crimping, no rams horn 180degree turns.

I wonder specifically what would prevent fitment.
 
  #45  
Old 08-29-2016, 09:56 AM
CharlyG's Avatar
CharlyG
CharlyG is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Hills, Ca.
Posts: 1,028
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
SO, I got this huge response to my question at 5 Star Tuning.

"I am curious as to why you sell a replacement Y pipe to replace the ram's horn on my 2000 Ford Excursion 6.8l 2wd XLT.

It makes sense for the ones with the reduction pipe(s), but does the 180 of the ram's horn really restrict things much?"

The very wordy response

yes it works 10 hp and 10 tq



Their ads claim the Y pipe is a 33hp and 35 torque improvement over the restricted style..so only a 1/3 comparative improvement to the ram's horn.

Seems hardly worth it for 10%, and I don't notice any flutter.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flybaby_3
Modular V10 (6.8l)
71
11-05-2016 12:15 PM
sandman3510
Ford Truck Parts for Sale
4
09-10-2016 09:13 AM
superkaz
Modular V10 (6.8l)
23
06-06-2016 06:40 PM
powerstroke8806
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
3
03-29-2016 01:09 AM
DickNitro
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
35
03-12-2016 02:46 PM



Quick Reply: '03 v10 y-pipe, good or bad???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 PM.