perf-list-digest Tuesday, September 15 1998 Volume 01 : Number 089



=======================================================================
Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance
Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe, send email to:
majordomoford-trucks.com
with the words "unsubscribe perf-list-digest" in the body of the
message.
=======================================================================
In this issue:

FTE Perf - Re: 514/C6 and rear end ratio
FTE Perf - '76 F350 460/C6 brake improvements
Re: FTE Perf - EEC-III
FTE Perf - 6.8 -- 5.4
FTE Perf - ADMIN: T-shirt design
Re: FTE Perf - Shocks
RE: FTE Perf - Shocks

=======================================================================

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 14 Sep 1998 15:22:05 -0400
From: John.L.Johnsontrw.com
Subject: FTE Perf - Re: 514/C6 and rear end ratio

In 1976 when you ordered an F350 460/C6 camper special, 4.10 was only
gear available. FYI, my tires are 9.5X16.5 radials, approx. 30.5 inches
in diameter. So you think 3.5 is tall enough?

John in N. VA
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: 14 Sep 1998 15:26:53 -0400
From: John.L.Johnsontrw.com
Subject: FTE Perf - '76 F350 460/C6 brake improvements

With slide-in camper loaded (9.5K GVW), brakes are marginal, IMHO. Has
anyone made any upgrades they'd like to mention? Has anyone done a swap
to the new rear disk set-up? Thanks for your advise/recommendations.

John in N. VA
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 14:20:57 -0600
From: "Dave Resch"
Subject: Re: FTE Perf - EEC-III

>From: ballingrldd.net (William L Ballinger)
>Subject: FTE Perf - EEC-III
>
>The EEC-III was also a fuel mangement system.
>I had an '83 Grand Marquis with a TBI 5.0 and AOD.
>It didn't have scan tool capabilities like the EEC-IV,
>you had to get the codes by counting the blinks on
>an LED under the Baro-Map sensor.

Yo Bill:

Oops!! You're right. I was going from (somewhat) faulty memory. The
EEC-IV was first used in 1984. The EEC-III was used from 1979 to 1983.
All pre-'84 CFI vehicles used the EEC-III system.

Dave R. (M-block devotee)


== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 12:31:01 -0800
From: Perry Klein
Subject: FTE Perf - 6.8 -- 5.4

Can anyone tell me if the 6.8 l is simply the 5.4 with two extra cylinders?
Is the front of the block identical? Can brackets designed for the
5.4 l be used on the 6.8?

thanks
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 22:23:11 -0400
From: Ken Payne
Subject: FTE Perf - ADMIN: T-shirt design

I had mentioned a couple of weeks ago that we would have
a prize pack for the winning t-shirt design. I forgot
to announce what the prize would be. It will include the
following:

a. free FTE t-shirt, hot off the press
b. 2 FTE window stickers
c. 1 meg web site space (http://www.ford-trucks.com/yourname)
for 1 year
d. email address (yournameford-trucks.com) for 1 year. If you
already have one, you can have a second or have your 2nd
year for free.

If we can think of more, we'll add it.

Ken Payne
CoAdmin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts
http://www.ford-trucks.com

== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:09:40 -0700
From: Brant Sawzak
Subject: Re: FTE Perf - Shocks

I would suggest a rear sway bar also, and to compensate use a 70/30 shock.
James Duff Enterprises has these and other equipment for the Explorer.

am14chrysler.com wrote:

> Andrew Chung writes: >>I'm looking to replace all four shock absorbers on
> my '98 Explorer. The body sways too much in turns and the rebound from the
> factory shocks is too stiff.
>
> You might want to try a rear stabilizer bar. This is the best method of
> keeping the vehicle from "swaying". Will stiffen the ride even more
> though!.!.!.!.
>
> Azie
> Ardmore, Al.
>
> == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html



== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:53:33 -0700
From: Andrew Chung
Subject: RE: FTE Perf - Shocks

Thanks for all the suggestions. I don't want to spend too much on my
vehicle at one time. I'm going to try and budget out my modifications
throughout the year. I think I'm going to go with the Edelbrock IAS
shocks. They don't perform quite as well overall as the Racho 9000s but
from the comments I've heard here and on the web, the IAS shocks will give
me better ride around town, where I will be spending most of my time. I
was definately thinking of changing the springs, and a sway bar would
proabaly help too. I know the Explorer has leaf springs in the back, is
there a simple way to change the rears to use real springs instead? Do you
normally have to get a different axle and then the springs on top of that?
I'm taking a pot shot in the dark on this one.

By the way, for anyone interested, K&N has a FIPK for the '98 Explorers in
the works. They have submitted the FIPK for C.A.R.B. certification and
they say it should probably pass and get the exemption number late this
year.

- -----Original Message-----
From:Brant Sawzak [SMTP:bsawzakteleport.com]
Sent:Tuesday, September 15, 1998 00:10
To:perf-listford-trucks.com
Subject:Re: FTE Perf - Shocks

I would suggest a rear sway bar also, and to compensate use a 70/30 shock.
James Duff Enterprises has these and other equipment for the Explorer.

am14chrysler.com wrote:

> Andrew Chung writes: >>I'm looking to replace all four shock absorbers
on
> my '98 Explorer. The body sways too much in turns and the rebound from
the
> factory shocks is too stiff.
>
> You might want to try a rear stabilizer bar. This is the best method of
> keeping the vehicle from "swaying". Will stiffen the ride even more
> though!.!.!.!.
>
> Azie
> Ardmore, Al.
>

== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html

------------------------------

End of perf-list-digest V1 #89
******************************

+--------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Performance ----------------+
| Send posts to perf-listford-trucks.com, |
| List removal information is on the web site. |
+---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+

ENDTAG; } ?>