return <<< ENDTAG
Please do not repost, forward or otherwise publish messages
contained in these archives without consent from the respective
author(s). These archives may not, in whole or part, be stored on
any public retrieval system (FTP, web, gopher, newsgroup, etc.) by
individuals or companies, without consent of the respective authors.
From: owner-61-79-list-digestford-trucks.com (61-79-list-digest)
Subject: 61-79-list-digest V4 #7
61-79-list-digest Thursday, January 6 2000 Volume 04 : Number 007
Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks and Vans
Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe, send email to:
with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list-digest" in the body of the
In this issue:
Re: FTE 61-79 - 360 FE Doubts
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 04:35:28 -0500
From: "G.T. Herpich" bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 360 FE Doubts
"William S. Hart" wrote:
> > Hey everyone!
> > . I just saw this in the WEB. Is this true?
> Some of it ...
> > > 360 FE:
> > >First year, 1958 I believe it was a 332.
> > >Perhaps around 1960 it went to 352.
> > >Near the end of the FE series run, in the pieckups anyway, the 352 was
> > known as the 360.
> > >This is the engine that little brothers 74 Ford half ton pickup
> > came with.
> > >I think the bore and stroke were the same as the 352 and it was just an
> > advertising gimmick when they called it a 360
> Not true, they really did change the bore on it to match the 390 at 4.05 ...
> can't remember what the 352 was, but it wasn't quite that I don't think ...
The 360 is a 390 with a 352 crank. Ford had to do something with all the 352
they had left over. (Just speculation)
> > Seems like the factory may have made a 383 FE engine for an
> > upcoming NASCAR
> My uncle just mentioned a 396 or so displacement FE, but this was in the
> 60's, not the 90's ... apparently Chevy was mad that Ford and Dodge were
> runnin these 427's, so they said we want a motor rule for 396's ... so Ford
> destroked a 427 for it and kicked their butt with that in practice, so they
> shut up ... my Uncle's a huge Ford fan though, so who knows how much of
> that's true, but that's what I heard ...
We ran a 396 FE in a B/G, C/A Maverick in the early 70's. Built it using a 427
side oiler block and a 361 FT crank. Shifted at 10,000! You should have
seen the chevy guys come looking when we fired it up in the pits. Ran a modified
Weber manifold with two sets of Hilborn Offy 4 cylinder injectors (the ones
for the FE were puny in comparison). I never heard of the NASCAR boys using
a 396 but if they did it would have been that easy. Just cut down the snout on
the FT crank.
> > rules change and I believe there may be a 401 FE out there too.
> That would be a 410 likely that he's thinkin of, a 390 with a 428 crank
> found in merc's in the mid to late 60's for a couple years :)
> Hope that helps clear thigns upa little, its aweful muddy water when you
> start looking at the one offs and stuff in the FE family ...
> Just my $.02
> 96 Mustang GT 5spd 4.6L
> 73ish 1/2ton 4x4 6.4L
> == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html
== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html
End of 61-79-list-digest V4 #7
+----- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961 though 1979 Trucks And Vans -----+
| Send posts to 61-79-listford-trucks.com, |
| List removal information is on the web site. |
+---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+