SS fuel lines, ending the dead head flow
#1
SS fuel lines, ending the dead head flow
So my upcoming air oil cooler build requires converting to an E series oil cooler cover. The E series fuel lines are routed differently so my existing F series lines will not work so I must fab up some SS lines because obtaining some used E series lines would be more expensive than just making new ss lines. I'd like to bounce this idea off everyone to see what they think. Here's the rough sketch of the idea...
The idea is to end the dead head design to try to equalize fuel pressure throughout all the injectors while keeping the factory E series fuel bowl & regulator so the rear most injectors aren't the end of the line getting less pressure than the forward most injectors. The line going to the rear of the head would be longer but I think if I made both feed lines from the bowl equal length then in theory the pressure to the front & back should be equal.
Thoughts? Suggestions?
The idea is to end the dead head design to try to equalize fuel pressure throughout all the injectors while keeping the factory E series fuel bowl & regulator so the rear most injectors aren't the end of the line getting less pressure than the forward most injectors. The line going to the rear of the head would be longer but I think if I made both feed lines from the bowl equal length then in theory the pressure to the front & back should be equal.
Thoughts? Suggestions?
#2
#3
The inlet/return are not changed. Basically the passenger side feed would feed the front of the heads & the drivers side feed would feed the back of the heads. I thought air was bled out through the factory regulator.
#4
So with that said... which direction would fuel flow? And if air were trapped in the center of the head... where would that go?
Currently, it would flow through an injector because there is no return from the heads. I see what your trying to do and it most likely would work. You want to eliminate restrictions, turbulence and back pressure.
Currently, it would flow through an injector because there is no return from the heads. I see what your trying to do and it most likely would work. You want to eliminate restrictions, turbulence and back pressure.
#5
In the oem setup, if air gets into either head past the regulator air bleed, it also must go through an injector. After a filter change is the only time air should be in the system, which the air bleed in the regulator is supposed to purge. The oem design also has no return from the heads, its returned from the regulator back to the pump.
If I were to put check valves inline the feed lines it would essentially be the same as the oem design, just a different flow.
If I were to put check valves inline the feed lines it would essentially be the same as the oem design, just a different flow.
#6
You would be better off to eliminate the stock regulator. Off the lines on the back of the heads you would have a pressure regulator. From the regulator it would then go to the return line back to the tank.
This kit accomplishes just that.
XDP 6.0L Regulated Return Fuel System XD206
This kit accomplishes just that.
XDP 6.0L Regulated Return Fuel System XD206
#7
You would be better off to eliminate the stock regulator. Off the lines on the back of the heads you would have a pressure regulator. From the regulator it would then go to the return line back to the tank.
This kit accomplishes just that.
XDP 6.0L Regulated Return Fuel System XD206
This kit accomplishes just that.
XDP 6.0L Regulated Return Fuel System XD206
03-07 Ford 6.0L Powerstroke Diesel Fuel Crossover Line Kit Essentially the same concept & probably easier. Just wanted to bounce some ideas off you guys to see if the front & back feed design would be better.
Trending Topics
#9
In doing some reading about the crossover or RR system, it seems there is not much of a benefit unless you are bumping up the turbo or injectors. Read a thread where Cheezit (former Ford tech) brought up a few points on the crossover idea. Said for one thing, if you begin to have failure with compression leaking by then you will have more difficulty in diagnostics and the compression into the fuel will affect the opposing side now. He also said that the "#8 and #7 injectors fail the most" theory was a myth in his opinion because he worked on these things for a living and did not think they failed any sooner or differently than the rest.
Anyway, just passing that along since I read it.
#11
In doing some reading about the crossover or RR system, it seems there is not much of a benefit unless you are bumping up the turbo or injectors. Read a thread where Cheezit (former Ford tech) brought up a few points on the crossover idea. Said for one thing, if you begin to have failure with compression leaking by then you will have more difficulty in diagnostics and the compression into the fuel will affect the opposing side now. He also said that the "#8 and #7 injectors fail the most" theory was a myth in his opinion because he worked on these things for a living and did not think they failed any sooner or differently than the rest.
Anyway, just passing that along since I read it.
#12
#13
The fuel crossover method might work a bit easier vs going with a Y feed off the bowl. I could install a high quality stainless steel shutoff valve inline on the crossover. That would allow bubble testing and the ability to clip the loop and separate each head. I'll have to ponder this idea a little more.