Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > 6.2L Boss
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

6.2L Boss Discuss the upcoming 6.2L V8






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2009, 12:22 AM
Scorpion67 Scorpion67 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 100
Scorpion67 is starting off with a positive reputation.
So pickuptrucks.com just reported 411HP/434lb-ft for the 6.2L V8 - at least for the Raptor anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2009, 02:11 PM
Raider50's Avatar
Raider50 Raider50 is offline
Elder User
2005 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Buffalo, Wyoming
Posts: 598
Raider50 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scorpion67 View Post
So pickuptrucks.com just reported 411HP/434lb-ft for the 6.2L V8 - at least for the Raptor anyway.
is there a article that goes with it? If i could get a link that would be awesome please. I hope its 411 to the wheels not at the flywheel.
__________________
I'm not cheap.....I'm just broke.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2009, 03:51 PM
Raider50's Avatar
Raider50 Raider50 is offline
Elder User
2005 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Buffalo, Wyoming
Posts: 598
Raider50 is starting off with a positive reputation.
never mind. my bad i found it.
__________________
I'm not cheap.....I'm just broke.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2009, 09:23 AM
Chris-NJ Chris-NJ is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 12
Chris-NJ is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'll pay for performance. Meaning equal of better than what I have now, two GM 6.2/6sp's. I paid 42K for my Sierra Denali and 52K for my wifes Yukon XL Denali, only because they had the 6.2. They are hands down the best vehicles I have ever owned, and I have owned a lot. It looks like Ford will put the 6.2 in Harley, but I hope they offer it in the Platinum or the next lower tier 1/2 tons, only because the Harley is just too much 'look' for me. I get crap now at the jobsites when my Denali is clean, so I keep it covered in dirt/mud, then no one notices it. I even smashed the rear end up recently when I forgot to lock my chipper down, and she smashed into the rear and I'm keeping it smashed.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 01:06 PM
Scorpion67 Scorpion67 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 100
Scorpion67 is starting off with a positive reputation.
i keep alternating what i want F150/SuperDuty, but an F150 Lariat Crew, long bed, 6.2 V8 with max tow package sounds good to me. I wouldn't get the Harley either.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 10:08 PM
montecarlo31 montecarlo31 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 277
montecarlo31 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris-NJ View Post
I'll pay for performance. Meaning equal of better than what I have now, two GM 6.2/6sp's. I paid 42K for my Sierra Denali and 52K for my wifes Yukon XL Denali, only because they had the 6.2. They are hands down the best vehicles I have ever owned, and I have owned a lot. It looks like Ford will put the 6.2 in Harley, but I hope they offer it in the Platinum or the next lower tier 1/2 tons, only because the Harley is just too much 'look' for me. I get crap now at the jobsites when my Denali is clean, so I keep it covered in dirt/mud, then no one notices it. I even smashed the rear end up recently when I forgot to lock my chipper down, and she smashed into the rear and I'm keeping it smashed.
I'm thinking that Ford will over the 6.2 in XLT and up simply because GM is offering the 6.2 in the LS or SLE trim and up.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009, 09:06 PM
irishsince81 irishsince81 is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 34
irishsince81 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Honestly, how come no-one ever thinks about what R.P.M. the torque curve starts. Instead of just numbers, ya know? That's quite important considering actual usable power. Instead of say my old "HEMI" p.o.s. Revving like crazy just to pull a small boat up hill.... Ill take a 6.8.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009, 09:10 PM
irishsince81 irishsince81 is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 34
irishsince81 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Same HEMI that actually put 247 H.P. to the wheels, out of its claimed 345.... Again, Ill take torque..
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2009, 10:42 AM
Chris-NJ Chris-NJ is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 12
Chris-NJ is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishsince81 View Post
Honestly, how come no-one ever thinks about what R.P.M. the torque curve starts. Instead of just numbers, ya know? That's quite important considering actual usable power. Instead of say my old "HEMI" p.o.s. Revving like crazy just to pull a small boat up hill.... Ill take a 6.8.
Your exactly right. One must look at the curves. I researched GM's 8.1 and 6.0 both that I owned, and the marketing motor the 6.0Max, and found the 6.0Max wouldn't cut it for my application. I was left with nothing to buy, even from Ford, and the new upgraded Hemi was not out yet. GM canned the 8.1. When the 6.2/6sp came out, I did it all over again, and found the 6.2 had 417ftlbs at 3500rpm, and had well over the 6.0 even at 2500-3000rpm, which was not too bad condidering it was mated to the 6sp, so I took an educated guess/buy on it, and it works pretty good. Ford always seems to be conservative on applying torque and trying to spread it out the most compared to the other two. The 5.4 does a nice job for such a small engine. So I'm hoping their 6.2 is better than my GM 6.2.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2009, 09:09 PM
irishsince81 irishsince81 is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 34
irishsince81 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris-NJ View Post
Your exactly right. One must look at the curves. I researched GM's 8.1 and 6.0 both that I owned, and the marketing motor the 6.0Max, and found the 6.0Max wouldn't cut it for my application. I was left with nothing to buy, even from Ford, and the new upgraded Hemi was not out yet. GM canned the 8.1. When the 6.2/6sp came out, I did it all over again, and found the 6.2 had 417ftlbs at 3500rpm, and had well over the 6.0 even at 2500-3000rpm, which was not too bad condidering it was mated to the 6sp, so I took an educated guess/buy on it, and it works pretty good. Ford always seems to be conservative on applying torque and trying to spread it out the most compared to the other two. The 5.4 does a nice job for such a small engine. So I'm hoping their 6.2 is better than my GM 6.2.

^^^^^ I could have not said it better myself, I loved my 3v 6.8 V10.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2010 , 60 , 62 , custom , engine , flareside , ford , info , latest , liter , pricing , raptor , sale , svt , truck

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.