Originally Posted by EPNCSU2006
Again, I don't think we are getting the whole picture of the situation. If someone were to produce a link stating otherwise, I'd feel that both were biased towards their cause. It's such a touchy subject, everyone wants their research to agree with their opinion on the matter.
Usually, what happens is that after someone comes out with a study, other scientists will verify the results -- they may agree and validate them, but they may find an error.
Here's the original research article, BTW:
http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/11191/2007/acpd-7-11191-2007.pdf
(sorry about not posting it earlier)
This research takes a previously more or less overlooked gas, N2O (laughing gas, not to be confused with NO2 or NOx) into account, and this does make perfect sense to me.