View Single Post
  #11  
Old 10-03-2005, 12:40 PM
76supercab2's Avatar
76supercab2
76supercab2 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,043
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by krewat
Theories?

We will run out of oil eventually.
PROOVE it.

Originally Posted by krewat
Did you ever see any Superfund sights? The places where toxic waste has been oozing from the ground? What do you think lives there? Nothing.

The Earth is a finite ball of rock. If we keep this up, it won't sustain itself (or us) forever.
Again, PROOVE that anything we can to will permanantely and forever destroy the earth. My theory is there is nothing on this planet that hasn't always been here. That includes crude oil and all it's derivitives.

Let's take Hiroshima as an example. We !!!NUKED!!! it. Doesn't get much more toxic than that. But it's not a barren wasteland today. People live there right now.

Originally Posted by krewat
But, please, go stick your head in the sand - you're not contributing anything to this thread.
EH. Personal attacks will get you nowhere. I'm saying that the statements you have made are widely accepted to be true. But there is no PROOF that any of them are, therefore they are THEORIES. They might be correct theories, but still theories. There might be something else we are not aware of now that would change that theory in the future.

For example, there is a contradicting theory that oil is simply a substance that Earth produces. It's not made from dead dinosaurs and it's not in limited supply. Why couldn't this theory be true? After all, oil is simply carbon and hydrogen atoms strung together in a chain. We can make it in the lab by simply inputting enough energy into the reaction. Why couldn't that be happening right now inside the Earth as we speak? Why should the two most pletiful atoms on this planet (or in the universe for that matter) be in limited supply?