Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums - View Single Post - Thoughts on this wvo setup
View Single Post
Old 11-14-2012, 08:29 AM
kirkharrod's Avatar
kirkharrod kirkharrod is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Frankfort, KY
Posts: 545
kirkharrod has a good reputation on FTE.kirkharrod has a good reputation on FTE.
Originally Posted by SkySkiJason View Post
As far as the tank goes, I prefer a 'heated sump' design. The idea is to heat a small amount of oil where it will be sucked out of the tank. The problems with heating the whole tank include expedited polymerization rate, increased condensation and obviously its just terribly inefficient. The typical 'heated pick-ups' are heating a column of oil, then pulling the coldest oil in the column from the bottom of the tank. A heated sump with limited communication to the main tank can primarily heat a much smaller volume of fuel, while heating the oil in the tank above it enough to allow it to run into the sump in the coldest weather.
Also, heating the whole tank makes it expand and contract and can crack the welds on the tank. I believe this is why my tank got a crack.
2002 F-250 Super Cab, 315,000 miles!!!, 115,000 on WVO; Greasecar conversion, 20 plate heat exchanger, AIH delete-water injection in its place, DIY stock fuel bowl delete, beans Diesel fuel sump, 6637 air filter w/ Pete's cover, Straight Piped, GPR LED mod, CAT ELC, 203* thermostat, Bosch auxiliary coolant pump, ext coolant filter, fumoto oil drain valve, Aeroforce Interceptor scan gauge, ISSPro trans temp, boost, EGT, elec fuel pressure gauges, Cyberdyne coolant, veg oil, ambient air temp gauges, 80W low beams/100W high beams.
Reply With Quote