Originally Posted by justiz00 (Post 7070597)

3 on tree column shift, for nostalgic sake.

Originally Posted by justiz00 (Post 7070597)

3 on tree column shift, for nostalgic sake.

Originally Posted by tseekins (Post 7071902)

That's what I learned to drive. I wonder how many youngsters would be perplexed over this set-up.

Tim

Originally Posted by devja71 (Post 7072894)

..ahem, i hope i don't start all sorts of trouble here, but i would like to see a plug-in electric powertrain. hear me out. a simple 250-300hp or so electric motor with some kind of cvt behind it to a common 2spd transfer case and d44 (or equivilent sterling) full floater high pinion straight axles. that and an onboard generator- a flex fuel small engine not even hooked to the driveline. and have it so we can just manually start and kill the engine when we want. and the batteries mounted in the front of the bed out of the way as possible. (i had that idea in my head before i saw the chevy volt). say if the electric only had mabey a 30-40 mile range, plug it in 110v all night drive the first 30m, start the gen to sustain it and (depending on how charged) shut the gen off and coast the last 30m before getting home. in cold weather run the generator for the heater etc) the generator would have to have some quick recovery tho. make it all simple/serviceable/fixable. love it or hate it, but that's my perfect truck. politics won't let it happen tho

Originally Posted by db_tanker (Post 6754353)

well...

would the sport trac be dropped if they brought out the F100 in a super crew? or would it be only available in a scab configuration? Make sure that it can seat, in Screw config, 4 people @ 6'3" and 240 lbs (two front two back) in relative comfort for at least 2 hours. I use myself and my friends as a base-line. I am 6'1" and a somewhat chunky 255. friends run the range from 6 even to 6'4" and all over 200. Cargo boxes...in the regular cab have 6' and 7', then in the scab and screw configs have a 5.5 and 6.5 available like the F150.

Engine choices...4, 6 and 8...pending what the eco-boost is able to produce...as it stands, I have seen nothing therefore I call wolf-cookies and demand at the very least a 4.6 as the top engine.

Curb weight...as the original F100 was supposed to be a "Quarter Ton truck" IIRC, but will more realistically have a box capable of say 1k and towing in the range of about 6k as that is what the ranger can do IIRC so I say have the vehicle curb weight of no more than 5k.

packages...not as many as the F150...custom or XL, then XLT, then FX2 or FX4, with 4x4 being standard in FX4 and optional in XLT and XL trim. The 4 cyl with auto or manual in XL only, XLT and FX2/4 will run the 6 or 8 with manual or auto.

4x4...forlorn hope here...but an optional SAS up front? doubt it, though. SO...IFS up front and solid diff rear. Perhaps also have a "Raptor" F100 version as well since the front will be IFS.

Size...I have seen some quotes at 4/5ths the size of a std F150 but using the same frame. I am uncertain if that would keep the weight down but hey, I ain't no engine-ear.

Make sure that the SVT team doesn't ignore the F100.


If they follow that, then I would commit right now to get one.

Originally Posted by rambuck (Post 7079157)

In my personal opinion, a new F100 would be an incredible move for Ford Motor Company. It would bring back the reminiscence of the early F Series trucks, after the F1, F2, and F3 of course, but still a perfect truck nonetheless.

Now, what I want on this piece of machinery:

Engines: 4, 6, and even an 8.

Cabs: Std, Extended, and Crew

Beds: 6 foot for std and ext. and 5.5 foot for a Crew; no need for the steps

Wheels: 16", 17", 18"

Transmission: 5 or 6 speed automatic. Maybe a 6 speed manual for penny-pinchers or a sport package

Packages: XL, XLT, FX4, FX2 Sport, Lariat, SVT, XFE. There is potential with an SVT.

Features (some are obviously optional): SYNC, Shift on the Fly, exceptional towing (like Ford always has), Rancho shocks, bed extender, cargo management, FULLY BOXED FRAME, fully flat rear seat thing, in-floor storage, power everything, and I'll get more on what I believe would make it better later.

Paint: Just nothing that screams, "Hey, this might as well be a work/fleet truck!" Except the colors for a work/fleet truck.

Originally Posted by justiz00 (Post 7079252)

Seems like wish lists like this are what is the downfall of the modern day automaker. Too many options that are viable to produce. How about this.

Engines:6, and an 8.

Cabs: Std and Crew

Beds: 6 foot for both.

Wheels: 16"

Transmission: Latest auto or standard.

Packages: Ranger, Sport, Sport Custom, Explorer

Features:A/C optional, Stake pockets, Bench seat,

Paint: Like the old F100s with the top of the cab and below the trim the same with the space in between white or solid, or two tone. Let this truck remind people of the ones they had back then. Not slap an old name on it and sell them a delorean.

Originally Posted by devja71 (Post 7073929)

if the aforementioned e-truck was parked side-by-side with an identical V6 powered truck beside it, it would be interesting to see which would really sell more. particularly if the e-truck was marketed well (since that's what seems to really sell trucks). and proven thru time. there is absolutely NO reason why we can't have cool/macho AND eco at the same time. i'm amazed as to how many ppl are brainwashed to that division line. remember the 289 mustangs? they wheren't much if any at all worse mpg than an inline 6er, especially if they had overdrive/lock up converter. and you get a punchy growly V8 that was fun to drive. they proved you could have your cake and eat it too. just because a small-mid pickup has straight axles doesn't mean it should take any more power or fuel to push it around. anyway, i just hope it would be given a chance. media says it'd never work and ppl hear that enough times till they just believe it. i never found the explorer very eco anyway.