Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums

Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums (https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/index.php)
-   General NON-Automotive Conversation (https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/forum19/)
-   -   Consumer Reports (https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1372322-consumer-reports.html)

ford2go 04-07-2015 12:17 AM

Consumer Reports
 
I've had a lot of issues with Consumer Reports over the years, and things haven't changed.

Of late, they've been putting out a lot of web stuff with top 10 or top 20 and the like.

Today I saw one for the quickest and slowest 0 - 60 times.

Well, they had a few GMs and a lot of European and Japanese brands. They had Camaro, but no Mustang -- hmmm. I checked around and the Mustang was showing 0 - 60 numbers as good or better than the Camaro ( as I thought). And the Camaro was not at the top or bottom, but somewhere in the middle of their list.

So, it was just pretty much BS, as a lot of their stuff seems to be.

hj

tseekins 04-07-2015 07:12 AM

I've been carrying mail for nearly 10 years and I've watched their subscription sales in the mail drop hugely. I used to purchase everything based on a consumer reports article, that was til they said that a family would be better buying a Prius for over 24K than another smaller car for around 15K. I think they are out of touch with American pay vs cost of living.

donjamer 04-07-2015 03:22 PM

I never believed their reports..

Always seemed to be flawed...

Probably they recommended whoever paid them the most..

Old93junk 04-07-2015 09:35 PM

They are biased to foreign makes too.

Remember when they reviewed small pick-ups and rated the Mazda B-Series over the Ford Ranger?..............They are the same truck!

jroehl 04-13-2015 09:56 AM

Their reviews of paints and stains pretty much did it for me, since I have (a lot of) experience in that area. What they were rating as tops was overpriced, and a major pain in the rear to use. One paint in particular that they rated very well had a tendency to both drag (not brush easily) and sag (run after application), which are normally mutually exclusive traits in a paint. CR doesn't fully explain their test methods with paints, but I suspect that they don't apply them as they would be by homeowners and pros in the field. In other words, I suspect they apply them by machine to get a consistent "wet-mil thickness", rather than by typical brush, roll and spray (and exterior paints that are sprayed need to be back-brushed if applied to an absorbant substrate like wood).

Jason


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands