Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #16  
Old 10-08-2010, 12:50 PM
Victor L's Avatar
Victor L Victor L is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 301
Victor L is starting off with a positive reputation.
Just wondering, did this engine run good before ? If so, did anything take place that may help explain why it now has a problem ?
__________________
69 F100 4x4 Short Bed 360 4 spd. Project in the works.
71 Mustang 500 ci. adrenaline pump.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-08-2010, 01:24 PM
F-250 WARHORSE's Avatar
F-250 WARHORSE F-250 WARHORSE is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: montrose, co
Posts: 959
F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Well, right off this morning, I will thank everyone for the input so far. I put a normal dizzy back into the motor to get away from the huge spark advance from the MR gasket recurve kit. Those things didn't work well for my brother or I, but atleast they are cheap and easy to install. I gave it a shot. Next, the engine is supposed to be really built, for an iron headed truck engine, 10.5 compression, big cam (flat tappet comp), roller rockers, D3 heads with 2.190 and 1.710 valves, straight up cam timing, ported/polished heads, and more that is already posted. The builder was trying to check the lift on all of the lobes but he said that with the engine in the vehicle it was very difficult and got only half done and gave up. Found no problems yet but said that he thinks he will have to tear it down and he WILL fix it when he finds the problem. The engine is brand new and has always been weak at best, or tired is maybe a more complete explanation. I thank you for your time and look forward to the replys, but it looks like a cam shaft to me at this point.
__________________
Due to the recent economic down turn, rising energy costs and mandatory labor cuts, the light at the end of the tunnel has temporarily been shut off, sorry for the inconvenience.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-08-2010, 02:24 PM
bobbyjo9 bobbyjo9 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 215
bobbyjo9 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Yeah... sounds like your running out of ideas "in the truck". Just had a thought though... pushrods... new I assume, and pardon such a basic thought here, were lengths verified? bent maybe???
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-08-2010, 03:58 PM
F-250 WARHORSE's Avatar
F-250 WARHORSE F-250 WARHORSE is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: montrose, co
Posts: 959
F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
not sure. I thought of that and I will definitely look into the pushrod verification when the motor is tore down.
__________________
Due to the recent economic down turn, rising energy costs and mandatory labor cuts, the light at the end of the tunnel has temporarily been shut off, sorry for the inconvenience.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-08-2010, 04:22 PM
jonbar87's Avatar
jonbar87 jonbar87 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 357
jonbar87 is starting off with a positive reputation.
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/jonathan-barnes/56/718/6a4
Sounds like too much timing. Do yo still have your stock distributor your could try? I know my 460 hates anything over 38* at 3000 with no load (pulling about 18" - 20" so don't know why yours would need that much.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-08-2010, 04:49 PM
F-250 WARHORSE's Avatar
F-250 WARHORSE F-250 WARHORSE is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: montrose, co
Posts: 959
F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I did reinstall a stock dizzy and that didn't change any symptoms except for the pinging quit. thanks the MR gasket recurve kit didn't do justice for me if anyone wants my 2 cents.
__________________
Due to the recent economic down turn, rising energy costs and mandatory labor cuts, the light at the end of the tunnel has temporarily been shut off, sorry for the inconvenience.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-07-2010, 12:49 PM
F-250 WARHORSE's Avatar
F-250 WARHORSE F-250 WARHORSE is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: montrose, co
Posts: 959
F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Well I got my rig back from the machine shop and it had new plug wires, no oil leaks, new cap and rotor, and it will set me back in the seat now. not sure it is 500 horsepower but it does good. I raced my brothers 7.3 powerstroke and beat him. I think with headers now it will do very well. I have been tuning on my Holley 670 truck avenger and got the flat spot gone off idle and now it has one that is about 2500 rpm right when it starts drawing fuel out of the venturies. I did some research and it turns out that the first gen truck avengers had a notorious flat spot at low rpm and holley will replace them at no charge with the new gen 2 that is better. I think I will quit messing with it until I talk to holley tomorrow.
__________________
Due to the recent economic down turn, rising energy costs and mandatory labor cuts, the light at the end of the tunnel has temporarily been shut off, sorry for the inconvenience.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-07-2010, 02:20 PM
monsterbaby's Avatar
monsterbaby monsterbaby is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: iowa
Posts: 18,097
monsterbaby has a superb reputationmonsterbaby has a superb reputationmonsterbaby has a superb reputationmonsterbaby has a superb reputationmonsterbaby has a superb reputationmonsterbaby has a superb reputationmonsterbaby has a superb reputationmonsterbaby has a superb reputationmonsterbaby has a superb reputationmonsterbaby has a superb reputationmonsterbaby has a superb reputation
glad to hear the shop got it working better for you. Thanks for coming back and letting us know.

Let us know about that gen2 holley too will ya?
__________________
Rob

RIP Steve Bricks. FTE will not be the same.

Will be forever glad to have had the privilege to shake your hand and BS in person.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-08-2010, 11:45 AM
F-250 WARHORSE's Avatar
F-250 WARHORSE F-250 WARHORSE is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: montrose, co
Posts: 959
F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Yes thanks everyone for the input it sure helped me so far. I think there is room for improvement but Holley said that those gen 1 TAs didn't run right and they will replace it with a gen 2 at no cost if I send it back, Already have the post office flat rate box too. Next is headers and that should wake it up then the new carb too. It is getting tolerable and best of all is all of the oil leaks are fixed. But I will let everyone know how the carb swap goes.
__________________
Due to the recent economic down turn, rising energy costs and mandatory labor cuts, the light at the end of the tunnel has temporarily been shut off, sorry for the inconvenience.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-09-2010, 12:39 PM
6863m 6863m is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 120
6863m is starting off with a positive reputation.
I am reading so much about headers it raises a question. I have a donor 1986 460 I am putting in my 1973 F 350. I was just going to use the stock headers and put in a new system from the headers back. Am I making a mistake not putting an after market set on the engine. I am planning to tow only and not extra large trailers.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-09-2010, 03:10 PM
F-250 WARHORSE's Avatar
F-250 WARHORSE F-250 WARHORSE is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: montrose, co
Posts: 959
F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Well, I have never personally owned a 460 with headers, but my neighbor had a 429 police interceptor that was built up and turned into a 460. It started life out with headers and glass packs and then evolved into mufflers and manifolds and that made great improvement on lowend torque which was awesome since the motor was in a 79 f250 4x4 that was used to tow. I thought my engine would run good with manifolds since his did but he must not of had build up that mine has. His truck did very well with a stock cast iron intake and a set of iron manifolds, so I bet you will be fine but a good aluminum intake will help some on performance and a set of headers should make a noticeable difference too if you are budgeted for it, the other thing I would recommend on a 1986 motor is put a straigt up timing set in it.
__________________
Due to the recent economic down turn, rising energy costs and mandatory labor cuts, the light at the end of the tunnel has temporarily been shut off, sorry for the inconvenience.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-30-2010, 08:49 PM
F-250 WARHORSE's Avatar
F-250 WARHORSE F-250 WARHORSE is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: montrose, co
Posts: 959
F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Well I got my Gen 2 holley 670 TA in the mail last monday and jetted it, adjusted the kickdown, got the idle and choke set for our 5* coldstarts in the mornings and it seems way better than the old TA. The flat spot is totally gone, it idles better, It is snappier, and, my favorite, it has noticeably more power. I thought there was something wrong with that carburetor and I was right, those things are defective from the factory. I couldn't get it to run right and I knew I was better with carbs than that. There is a slight hesitation when the vacuum secondaries open, at WOT, You feel the motor slightly flatten out then the roar gets a little louder and she really sets you back in the seat. I think for optimum performance, It needs a lighter spring in the secondaries but I will leave it the way it is, up here where the air is thin and vacuum is a little low, I thought that would be a consideration for factory calibration, but I think where those secondaries stay closed longer, it might keep fuel mileage up a little and when offroading, it will be easier on the u-joints, but overall, I'm happy with the setup. I think with headers, it will really run. If anyone has a 1st gen TA, send it back for the upgrade.
__________________
Due to the recent economic down turn, rising energy costs and mandatory labor cuts, the light at the end of the tunnel has temporarily been shut off, sorry for the inconvenience.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-02-2010, 04:04 AM
ArdWrknTrk's Avatar
ArdWrknTrk ArdWrknTrk is offline
<---Dog is my co-pilot
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EXTREME southwest CT
Posts: 19,070
ArdWrknTrk has a superb reputationArdWrknTrk has a superb reputationArdWrknTrk has a superb reputationArdWrknTrk has a superb reputationArdWrknTrk has a superb reputationArdWrknTrk has a superb reputationArdWrknTrk has a superb reputationArdWrknTrk has a superb reputationArdWrknTrk has a superb reputationArdWrknTrk has a superb reputationArdWrknTrk has a superb reputation
You need a HEAVIER secondary spring if you can feel a flat spot before they kick in.

http://www.holley.com/data/Products/...199R8219-2.pdf

Get a 20-15 kit and perhaps a 20-59 quick change cap if you don't like disassembling your carb all the time to change them.
Be careful the o-rings stay in place if you get the 20-59. A little dab of vaseline will hold them in place.
__________________
Jim (AKA Princess Glitzhooter)
'87 F-250
460, 4V 0-80457s, Edelbrock Intake, Saginaw PS Pump, BW 1356 4x4, 4.10 10.25", 130A 3G Alt., PMGR starter, ZF-5, - Lil' Red
http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg117/donjamer/FTE%20Pics/blumax500-1-1.jpgFTE Fraternity of Blue Max
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-03-2010, 05:04 PM
F-250 WARHORSE's Avatar
F-250 WARHORSE F-250 WARHORSE is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: montrose, co
Posts: 959
F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Well, thanks for the input, but the secondaries are staying closed until the engine makes vacuum off of the open primary then they open the secondaries, and mine flattens out slightly, not because it leans out, but because there is something wrong with the engine and the manifold vacuum actually drops as the RPMs increase, like a plugged exhaust. So, there fore, there isn't enough vacuum to open the secondaries like they're supposed to. I appreciate your input and am not trying to citicize your post, only merely clarifying the details that are not yet widely known about my situation. If the engine was correct, then yes it would be opening the secondaries too soon and leaning out but it is in need of headers to start with and god only knows what after that!! However, I put a screw in the secondaries linkage to open them sooner and the problem fixed itself then. I assumed upon that test that the secondaries needed to open with less vacuum, which explains the problem, and supports my theory that the spring is in fact too heavy and holding the linkage shut a little longer than optimum. I could be wrong, but based on my scenario, the engine's low vacuum condition is causing a flatspot by not opening the throttle soon enuogh.
__________________
Due to the recent economic down turn, rising energy costs and mandatory labor cuts, the light at the end of the tunnel has temporarily been shut off, sorry for the inconvenience.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-17-2010, 11:55 AM
F-250 WARHORSE's Avatar
F-250 WARHORSE F-250 WARHORSE is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: montrose, co
Posts: 959
F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.F-250 WARHORSE is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Well I'm back. Installed my L&L chassis exit headers tuesday. Went well I had a slight motor mount issue that I had to resolve to gain clearance on the passenger side but after that thi install went smoothly. The headers are a little tight with the cooler lines on a C6 but they look like they will fit with a little creativity. Next thing was the performance. Seemed to gain a noticable amount of snappiness off the bottom but seemed to almost flatten out up high, possibly a carb issue now that the manifolds are no longer restricting it, but I didn't drive it enough with uncorked headers to tune it. However, it did seem to eliminate the hesitation when the secondaries open so now we have an even power curve until it flattens out which is cool. I am still not a fan of headers but they do improve the situation. I agree with the previous discussions that headers are necessary and the L&Ls are my recomendation at this point. I have heard some bad and even had a few bad experiences myself but they are a nice header. When the exhaust is hooked back up, I will tune some more and repost. Thanks for all of the good info, none of it has led me astray yet.
__________________
Due to the recent economic down turn, rising energy costs and mandatory labor cuts, the light at the end of the tunnel has temporarily been shut off, sorry for the inconvenience.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 11:55 AM
 
 
 
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
94 460 EFI missing sgg93 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 10 02-10-2014 11:23 AM
Seat electric heat lebanontn Super Duty & Heavy Duty 4 03-17-2013 11:42 PM
Is my combination making my motor run slugish? 460 FORD MAN Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460) 6 01-26-2013 01:03 PM
throttle won't depress...idle very fast. Myfreeford Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System 1 11-02-2012 08:15 PM
suspension banging norfolk-southern 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 3 03-21-2005 07:38 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)

Tags
460, 48, cam, exhaust, ford, increase, inline, intermittent, light, performance, plugged, rpm, signs, spark, timing, weak

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup