Converted 1997 F-350 7.5 460 to Sequential EFI - Dyno Graphs Inside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 09-29-2010, 12:25 PM
mdula's Avatar
mdula
mdula is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 85lebaront2
If I hadn't already started acquiring my stuff for a conversion, I probably would have looked at AEM, I looked at a bunch of aftermarket setups. My major hangup on them was transmission control. I am going to EFI primarily to use an E4OD in place of the C6. I did acquire a 93 SD SEFI computer with E4OD control but after talking with a number of people found that SD doesn't tolerate much cam change. It causes the same issues we used to see with lumpy cams that had low vacuum at idle.

I plan on seeing if mine will go 16:1 or leaner at cruise, the old 390 2V engines in the LTDs would cruise at 19:1 or leaner (they would peg an AFR meter on the lean side). At least I don't have to worry about Cats on mine.
So will the AEM not have the ability to control an E4OD?
 
  #17  
Old 09-29-2010, 12:36 PM
85lebaront2's Avatar
85lebaront2
85lebaront2 is offline
Old School Hot Rodder

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Exmore, VA
Posts: 6,471
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Not that I could determine. Everything I found required another stand alone transmission controller. That gets expensive fast. One of the issues I found is the E4OD is different electronically than the AODE or 4R70W. As a result, the pouplar ECMS (A9L and similar) will not operate it. Only the truck computers, 5.0L or 5.8L with E4OD have the circuits for this. I am going to be using a WAY1 box which uses the VEX1 strategy. It is a 5.0L Bronco unit.
 
  #18  
Old 09-29-2010, 01:17 PM
jonbar87's Avatar
jonbar87
jonbar87 is offline
Tuned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 426
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mdula
So will the AEM not have the ability to control an E4OD?
Yes it does. You would just have to use the 30-1401 unit instead of the 30-1400 like I did. The only difference between the two is that the 1400 is setup for a standard transmission while the 1401 is setup for auto transmission controls. Like I've said before, this is a STANDALONE unit, it can do ANYTHING you want it to!

 
  #19  
Old 09-29-2010, 10:29 PM
jonbar87's Avatar
jonbar87
jonbar87 is offline
Tuned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 426
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 85lebaront2
If I hadn't already started acquiring my stuff for a conversion, I probably would have looked at AEM, I looked at a bunch of aftermarket setups. My major hangup on them was transmission control. I am going to EFI primarily to use an E4OD in place of the C6. I did acquire a 93 SD SEFI computer with E4OD control but after talking with a number of people found that SD doesn't tolerate much cam change. It causes the same issues we used to see with lumpy cams that had low vacuum at idle.

I plan on seeing if mine will go 16:1 or leaner at cruise, the old 390 2V engines in the LTDs would cruise at 19:1 or leaner (they would peg an AFR meter on the lean side). At least I don't have to worry about Cats on mine.
Cruise at 19:1...? I've never owned a 390 so I don't know but that sounds a bit lean to me....

General Air Fuel Ratio Effect on Engine Performance

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1271770234.jpg

http://blog.unleashedmoto.com/wp-con...ge_airfuel.jpg
 
  #20  
Old 09-30-2010, 10:21 AM
85lebaront2's Avatar
85lebaront2
85lebaront2 is offline
Old School Hot Rodder

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Exmore, VA
Posts: 6,471
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Jonbar, this was a 68 or 69 LTD with the 390 2V engine at a friend's shop just up the road from mine. He is a Chevy guy, and was showing me how efficient Ford's intake design was. He and I had staion wagons at the time for our families and were comparing notes. His was a Pontiac LeMans into which he had istalled a 327 250hp and Powerglide, 3:08 gear rear end and dual exhausts, mine was a 1970 1/2 Falcon with a 302 that I had installed 1965 289 4V heads and intake on, 351W exhaust manifolds and dual exhausts 3:00 gear. Around town I could kill him on fuel economy, but highway, they were real close due to his Quadrajet vs. my Holley. I finally got up to his level when I put a 1974 California 460 Carter Thermoquad on the 302. I know you can't do that level of lean mixture with EGR or catalyst as it just won't work. The catalyst needs that narrow range the O2 sensor wirks in.
 
  #21  
Old 09-30-2010, 10:23 AM
jonbar87's Avatar
jonbar87
jonbar87 is offline
Tuned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 426
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 85lebaront2
Jonbar, this was a 68 or 69 LTD with the 390 2V engine at a friend's shop just up the road from mine. He is a Chevy guy, and was showing me how efficient Ford's intake design was. He and I had staion wagons at the time for our families and were comparing notes. His was a Pontiac LeMans into which he had istalled a 327 250hp and Powerglide, 3:08 gear rear end and dual exhausts, mine was a 1970 1/2 Falcon with a 302 that I had installed 1965 289 4V heads and intake on, 351W exhaust manifolds and dual exhausts 3:00 gear. Around town I could kill him on fuel economy, but highway, they were real close due to his Quadrajet vs. my Holley. I finally got up to his level when I put a 1974 California 460 Carter Thermoquad on the 302. I know you can't do that level of lean mixture with EGR or catalyst as it just won't work. The catalyst needs that narrow range the O2 sensor wirks in.
I see. That's interesting.
 
  #22  
Old 04-30-2012, 12:52 AM
jonbar87's Avatar
jonbar87
jonbar87 is offline
Tuned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 426
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My F-350 was stolen this last December and I replaced it with a 2012 F-150. The entire SEFI kit is for sale. It includes the complete wiring harness that I made, MAP sensor and the programmable AEM 30-1400 ECU. Let me know if you're interested. Quote me a price and we'll talk.
 
  #23  
Old 05-07-2012, 11:39 AM
scottfreeman's Avatar
scottfreeman
scottfreeman is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascade, ID
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stolen......

That sucks....did they catch the lowrents that drove it off?
 
  #24  
Old 05-07-2012, 08:49 PM
jonbar87's Avatar
jonbar87
jonbar87 is offline
Tuned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 426
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by scottfreeman
That sucks....did they catch the lowrents that drove it off?
Nope. Never found it. I'm sure it's running drugs on the border. I replaced it with a 2012 F-150...don't regret it at all
 
  #25  
Old 05-08-2012, 08:33 AM
jas88's Avatar
jas88
jas88 is online now
Lead Driver

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greater Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,300
Likes: 0
Received 355 Likes on 285 Posts
So, if the truck was stolen, why was the AEM not stolen along with it?
 
  #26  
Old 05-08-2012, 12:18 PM
jonbar87's Avatar
jonbar87
jonbar87 is offline
Tuned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 426
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jas88
So, if the truck was stolen, why was the AEM not stolen along with it?
Funny you ask...someone on a different forum asked the exact same question.

About 6 months before it was stolen I decided to sell it, and since I was going to sell it, I converted it back to stock. That's why I still have the AEM with all the wiring and sensor.
 
  #27  
Old 07-01-2012, 09:19 AM
Haz Tanker's Avatar
Haz Tanker
Haz Tanker is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 33
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 85lebaront2
Not that I could determine. Everything I found required another stand alone transmission controller. That gets expensive fast. One of the issues I found is the E4OD is different electronically than the AODE or 4R70W. As a result, the pouplar ECMS (A9L and similar) will not operate it. Only the truck computers, 5.0L or 5.8L with E4OD have the circuits for this. I am going to be using a WAY1 box which uses the VEX1 strategy. It is a 5.0L Bronco unit.
I have a 1993 Super Duty with an E4OD, the 7.3 engine is the old IDI type, the truck uses a computer for the trans, perhaps you could make one of these work for you?
 
  #28  
Old 07-01-2012, 01:41 PM
85lebaront2's Avatar
85lebaront2
85lebaront2 is offline
Old School Hot Rodder

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Exmore, VA
Posts: 6,471
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I have a friend, who is also on here, who has been trying for a couple of years to get an IDI trans controller to work with a gasoline engine. He has had all kinds of problems starting with the rpm signal. He finally threw in the towel and ordered a Baumann Optishift.
 
  #29  
Old 07-01-2012, 06:36 PM
peter_x's Avatar
peter_x
peter_x is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the kit still for sale? How much are you looking for?
 
  #30  
Old 07-01-2012, 07:07 PM
jonbar87's Avatar
jonbar87
jonbar87 is offline
Tuned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 426
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by peter_x
Is the kit still for sale? How much are you looking for?
I paid $750 for the AEM 30-1400 ECU, (still has my dyno tune programmed on it) $50 for the wiring harness from the junk yard, and had a Honda map sensor lying around (that you could have). I kept the instructions in the glove box but obviously they got stolen with the pickup so unfortunately I no longer have them but I could walk you through the install from what I remember. Make me a REASONABLE offer and I'd consider selling.
 


Quick Reply: Converted 1997 F-350 7.5 460 to Sequential EFI - Dyno Graphs Inside



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 AM.