Excursion - King of SUVs 2000 - 2005 Ford Excursion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

RAS AND Airbags????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-24-2010, 09:30 PM
Redeyeracing's Avatar
Redeyeracing
Redeyeracing is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Draper, UT
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAS AND Airbags????

I have the RAS already and love it but also have a pair of Ride Rites Airbags sitting on my bench that I got free. Is it worth having both? Is anyone running both?

Thanks for the replies.

Nate
 
  #2  
Old 08-24-2010, 11:55 PM
EXv10's Avatar
EXv10
EXv10 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt. Shasta California
Posts: 11,798
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Ras is an anti wrap device and the bags are a spring helper so if you do heavy towing I would definitely throw them in.
 
  #3  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:06 AM
X-Hibition's Avatar
X-Hibition
X-Hibition is offline
Elder User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Outside Boise, Idaho
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, you can't use them together. And you are only 375 miles away from me. I'll come get them...

What are you towing? That will make the decision for you.
 
  #4  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:14 AM
Redeyeracing's Avatar
Redeyeracing
Redeyeracing is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Draper, UT
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tow multiple snowmobile trailers up to 35 feet and a 23 foot Master Craft. I usually have the EX FULL of gear and people while doing these activities also.
 
  #5  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:19 AM
X_Hemi_Guy's Avatar
X_Hemi_Guy
X_Hemi_Guy is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,237
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
I'm sure you can use them together...although I'm not sure what you will be adding actually.

Does the rear of the Ex squat excessively (like more than 3" or something)?

The RAS is a variable rate spring that 'assists' the rear leaf springs.

I tow a 9000# travel trailer that puts 1100-1200#'s of tongue weight on the rear axle. My rear axle is right at the GAWR of 5250#'s...I have no issues with excessive squat...now...if you aren't using a weight distribution hitch like I am...well that could be it.

Also if you aren't...you may want to look at the receiver ratings...if you are over 500#'s of tongue weight...Ford requires the WD hitch to let you go up to the 1250# (or 1000#) rating on your receiver.

Again...you can probably use both...but if you need both...I suspect you are way overloaded on your rear axle which is the real problem you should be solving...just some thoughts.

joe.
 
  #6  
Old 08-25-2010, 02:16 AM
EXv10's Avatar
EXv10
EXv10 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt. Shasta California
Posts: 11,798
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by X_Hemi_Guy
I'm sure you can use them together...although I'm not sure what you will be adding actually.

Does the rear of the Ex squat excessively (like more than 3" or something)?

The RAS is a variable rate spring that 'assists' the rear leaf springs.

I tow a 9000# travel trailer that puts 1100-1200#'s of tongue weight on the rear axle. My rear axle is right at the GAWR of 5250#'s...I have no issues with excessive squat...now...if you aren't using a weight distribution hitch like I am...well that could be it.

Also if you aren't...you may want to look at the receiver ratings...if you are over 500#'s of tongue weight...Ford requires the WD hitch to let you go up to the 1250# (or 1000#) rating on your receiver.

Again...you can probably use both...but if you need both...I suspect you are way overloaded on your rear axle which is the real problem you should be solving...just some thoughts.

joe.
RAS doesn't assist the rear springs in the form of load carrying capacity and is mostly an anti wrap device. The air bags would be beneficial to someone who does heavy towing because they do assist the springs in the form of sharing the burden, therefore it would be a great combination for heavy towing.
http://www.activesuspension.com/videos.html see the video; RAS in action. Hemi guy does have more experience with towing than I do though so this is just my 7 cents (inflation).
But wait! The OP never mentioned towing so OP, if you don't tow just pack them up and send them to me and I will dispose of them properly.
 
  #7  
Old 08-25-2010, 03:27 AM
Monsta's Avatar
Monsta
Monsta is offline
Sit. Stay.

Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Washington State
Posts: 18,308
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by EXv10
RAS doesn't assist the rear springs in the form of load carrying capacity...
From their website: "When towing a boat, trailer, camper or other heavy equipment, Roadmaster Active Suspension adds strength to the rear leaf springs while absorbing the increased load. "
 
  #8  
Old 08-25-2010, 07:37 AM
DSMMH's Avatar
DSMMH
DSMMH is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
I have Landyot Radius Rods to eliminate axle wrap and Firestone airbags to level the load. I tow a 6X12 dump trailer and sometimes it is not loaded correctly (too much tongue weight) at the materials outlet. So I get out the little portable air compressor and inflate the airbags to level the load. Works great.

DSMMH
 
  #9  
Old 08-25-2010, 07:59 AM
X_Hemi_Guy's Avatar
X_Hemi_Guy
X_Hemi_Guy is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,237
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
Thanks Monsta...I'm not sure how the RAS couldn't add rear spring capacity with where it is located and the physical attachment of the spring.

The physics involved with how the RAS is mounted by assisting the leaf springs to 'resist' flattening...the way I think about it the only way the leaf springs are more resistant to flattening is to have more capacity. It is basically an add a leaf but in a torsionial spring mounting position horizontal to the ground.

The difference for me is that they are totally PASSIVE meaning that I do not have to pump up the RAS to add height to the Ex...as I drop more and more load on the rear of the Ex...the combination of the RAS and stock leaf springs takes up the load.

FWIW...it is my opinion that you actually WANT some squat in the rear of your truck to engage/load the deeper springs in the spring pack...placing hard airbags in the equation...you are essentially riding more on the air bags than the springs.

When I load up with fire wood and other camping gear in the rear of the Ex and then drop 1100#'s of tongue weight...I get about 1.5-2" of squat...and to me that is a perfectly acceptable reaction to the load.

The method DSMMH took to eliminate wrap and add spring capacity (i.e. landyots and air bags)...I fulfilled with the RAS and with all the care free miles I've towed...I can say that my setup is incredibly stable...so my thinking is my $240 for the RAS was worth it to me...but there are lots of ways to skin a perverted cat!

My opinion still stands...I'm not sure what the benefit is of RAS and Air Bags unless someone is seriously overloaded...

Joe.
 
  #10  
Old 08-25-2010, 08:48 AM
jh818's Avatar
jh818
jh818 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chino, California
Posts: 2,884
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by X_Hemi_Guy
My opinion still stands...I'm not sure what the benefit is of RAS and Air Bags unless someone is seriously overloaded...

Joe.
I agree. With the air bags, you can adjust the "tension" by adding or removing air. But since the OP already has the RAS, there is no reason to add air bags. Loading the Ex to the point of requiring the air bags may already exceed the GAWR?

Originally Posted by X_Hemi_Guy
...but there are lots of ways to skin a perverted cat!
A peeping tom cat!
 
  #11  
Old 08-25-2010, 11:05 AM
EXv10's Avatar
EXv10
EXv10 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt. Shasta California
Posts: 11,798
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
On the video; RAS in action, on the RAS website , they say they don't add to carrying capacity, they give a better ride, they keep the arch in the spring, they don't affect the ride, they lean less on with a load, ect, which is all contradictory. They are like a president running for office, they say whatever sounds good at the time. It will affect the ride if it stiffens the front arch section at at all. It's like the hype on expensive shocks; all they can possibly do is give you a rougher rider and possibly last a bit longer. Look at the ras in the video; it is almost on the same plane as the front leaf section and it appears to give some assist for the load but is mostly a wrap device. Load assist=rougher ride, no way around it. Probably not enough to notice much though.
 
  #12  
Old 08-25-2010, 11:10 AM
EXv10's Avatar
EXv10
EXv10 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt. Shasta California
Posts: 11,798
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Monsta
From their website: "When towing a boat, trailer, camper or other heavy equipment, Roadmaster Active Suspension adds strength to the rear leaf springs while absorbing the increased load. "
If if you take time to listen to most of all they say they start to talk in circles and leave your head baffled.
 
  #13  
Old 08-25-2010, 11:17 AM
EXv10's Avatar
EXv10
EXv10 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt. Shasta California
Posts: 11,798
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by X_Hemi_Guy
My opinion still stands...I'm not sure what the benefit is of RAS and Air Bags unless someone is seriously overloaded...

Joe.
I agree with you plus you, a little help with the load and the added benefit of the anti-wrap action.
 
  #14  
Old 08-25-2010, 11:21 AM
gr8scott72's Avatar
gr8scott72
gr8scott72 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Summit, MS
Posts: 2,332
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by EXv10
On the video; RAS in action, on the RAS website , they say they don't add to carrying capacity, they give a better ride, they keep the arch in the spring, they don't affect the ride, they lean less on with a load, ect, which is all contradictory. They are like a president running for office, they say whatever sounds good at the time. It will affect the ride if it stiffens the front arch section at at all. It's like the hype on expensive shocks; all they can possibly do is give you a rougher rider and possibly last a bit longer. Look at the ras in the video; it is almost on the same plane as the front leaf section and it appears to give some assist for the load but is mostly a wrap device. Load assist= rougher ride, no way around it.
Hype or not, they work and the ride isn't noticeably rougher when empty and it's much better when towing. GREAT towing mod that doesn't affect daily driving when not towing.
 
  #15  
Old 08-26-2010, 12:02 AM
kidwagon's Avatar
kidwagon
kidwagon is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EXv10
On the video; RAS in action, on the RAS website , they say they don't add to carrying capacity, they give a better ride, they keep the arch in the spring, they don't affect the ride, they lean less on with a load, ect, which is all contradictory.
I agree they do not add capacity because theoretically capacitiy is determined by the factory not anything you add to your truck, so that is basically said for legal reasons if nothing else. What they do is reduce the amount of deflection which is really the goal of the air bags I would think. I have the RAS and tow a 35 foot 10,000# trailer and have found the deflection to be less than two inches. I have thought about air bags but I haven't really felt the need myself.

Ryan
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Joe28443
Excursion - King of SUVs
5
05-31-2016 12:22 AM
LivingLarge
Excursion - King of SUVs
10
06-03-2014 03:39 PM
pgguru
Excursion - King of SUVs
5
12-08-2013 09:03 PM
Scoob5555
Excursion - King of SUVs
13
03-18-2011 10:44 PM
dwalton5
Excursion - King of SUVs
1
01-31-2010 06:35 PM



Quick Reply: RAS AND Airbags????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM.