RAS AND Airbags????
#1
#4
#5
I'm sure you can use them together...although I'm not sure what you will be adding actually.
Does the rear of the Ex squat excessively (like more than 3" or something)?
The RAS is a variable rate spring that 'assists' the rear leaf springs.
I tow a 9000# travel trailer that puts 1100-1200#'s of tongue weight on the rear axle. My rear axle is right at the GAWR of 5250#'s...I have no issues with excessive squat...now...if you aren't using a weight distribution hitch like I am...well that could be it.
Also if you aren't...you may want to look at the receiver ratings...if you are over 500#'s of tongue weight...Ford requires the WD hitch to let you go up to the 1250# (or 1000#) rating on your receiver.
Again...you can probably use both...but if you need both...I suspect you are way overloaded on your rear axle which is the real problem you should be solving...just some thoughts.
joe.
Does the rear of the Ex squat excessively (like more than 3" or something)?
The RAS is a variable rate spring that 'assists' the rear leaf springs.
I tow a 9000# travel trailer that puts 1100-1200#'s of tongue weight on the rear axle. My rear axle is right at the GAWR of 5250#'s...I have no issues with excessive squat...now...if you aren't using a weight distribution hitch like I am...well that could be it.
Also if you aren't...you may want to look at the receiver ratings...if you are over 500#'s of tongue weight...Ford requires the WD hitch to let you go up to the 1250# (or 1000#) rating on your receiver.
Again...you can probably use both...but if you need both...I suspect you are way overloaded on your rear axle which is the real problem you should be solving...just some thoughts.
joe.
#6
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt. Shasta California
Posts: 11,798
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
I'm sure you can use them together...although I'm not sure what you will be adding actually.
Does the rear of the Ex squat excessively (like more than 3" or something)?
The RAS is a variable rate spring that 'assists' the rear leaf springs.
I tow a 9000# travel trailer that puts 1100-1200#'s of tongue weight on the rear axle. My rear axle is right at the GAWR of 5250#'s...I have no issues with excessive squat...now...if you aren't using a weight distribution hitch like I am...well that could be it.
Also if you aren't...you may want to look at the receiver ratings...if you are over 500#'s of tongue weight...Ford requires the WD hitch to let you go up to the 1250# (or 1000#) rating on your receiver.
Again...you can probably use both...but if you need both...I suspect you are way overloaded on your rear axle which is the real problem you should be solving...just some thoughts.
joe.
Does the rear of the Ex squat excessively (like more than 3" or something)?
The RAS is a variable rate spring that 'assists' the rear leaf springs.
I tow a 9000# travel trailer that puts 1100-1200#'s of tongue weight on the rear axle. My rear axle is right at the GAWR of 5250#'s...I have no issues with excessive squat...now...if you aren't using a weight distribution hitch like I am...well that could be it.
Also if you aren't...you may want to look at the receiver ratings...if you are over 500#'s of tongue weight...Ford requires the WD hitch to let you go up to the 1250# (or 1000#) rating on your receiver.
Again...you can probably use both...but if you need both...I suspect you are way overloaded on your rear axle which is the real problem you should be solving...just some thoughts.
joe.
http://www.activesuspension.com/videos.html see the video; RAS in action. Hemi guy does have more experience with towing than I do though so this is just my 7 cents (inflation).
But wait! The OP never mentioned towing so OP, if you don't tow just pack them up and send them to me and I will dispose of them properly.
#7
From their website: "When towing a boat, trailer, camper or other heavy equipment, Roadmaster Active Suspension adds strength to the rear leaf springs while absorbing the increased load. "
Trending Topics
#8
I have Landyot Radius Rods to eliminate axle wrap and Firestone airbags to level the load. I tow a 6X12 dump trailer and sometimes it is not loaded correctly (too much tongue weight) at the materials outlet. So I get out the little portable air compressor and inflate the airbags to level the load. Works great.
DSMMH
DSMMH
#9
Thanks Monsta...I'm not sure how the RAS couldn't add rear spring capacity with where it is located and the physical attachment of the spring.
The physics involved with how the RAS is mounted by assisting the leaf springs to 'resist' flattening...the way I think about it the only way the leaf springs are more resistant to flattening is to have more capacity. It is basically an add a leaf but in a torsionial spring mounting position horizontal to the ground.
The difference for me is that they are totally PASSIVE meaning that I do not have to pump up the RAS to add height to the Ex...as I drop more and more load on the rear of the Ex...the combination of the RAS and stock leaf springs takes up the load.
FWIW...it is my opinion that you actually WANT some squat in the rear of your truck to engage/load the deeper springs in the spring pack...placing hard airbags in the equation...you are essentially riding more on the air bags than the springs.
When I load up with fire wood and other camping gear in the rear of the Ex and then drop 1100#'s of tongue weight...I get about 1.5-2" of squat...and to me that is a perfectly acceptable reaction to the load.
The method DSMMH took to eliminate wrap and add spring capacity (i.e. landyots and air bags)...I fulfilled with the RAS and with all the care free miles I've towed...I can say that my setup is incredibly stable...so my thinking is my $240 for the RAS was worth it to me...but there are lots of ways to skin a perverted cat!
My opinion still stands...I'm not sure what the benefit is of RAS and Air Bags unless someone is seriously overloaded...
Joe.
The physics involved with how the RAS is mounted by assisting the leaf springs to 'resist' flattening...the way I think about it the only way the leaf springs are more resistant to flattening is to have more capacity. It is basically an add a leaf but in a torsionial spring mounting position horizontal to the ground.
The difference for me is that they are totally PASSIVE meaning that I do not have to pump up the RAS to add height to the Ex...as I drop more and more load on the rear of the Ex...the combination of the RAS and stock leaf springs takes up the load.
FWIW...it is my opinion that you actually WANT some squat in the rear of your truck to engage/load the deeper springs in the spring pack...placing hard airbags in the equation...you are essentially riding more on the air bags than the springs.
When I load up with fire wood and other camping gear in the rear of the Ex and then drop 1100#'s of tongue weight...I get about 1.5-2" of squat...and to me that is a perfectly acceptable reaction to the load.
The method DSMMH took to eliminate wrap and add spring capacity (i.e. landyots and air bags)...I fulfilled with the RAS and with all the care free miles I've towed...I can say that my setup is incredibly stable...so my thinking is my $240 for the RAS was worth it to me...but there are lots of ways to skin a perverted cat!
My opinion still stands...I'm not sure what the benefit is of RAS and Air Bags unless someone is seriously overloaded...
Joe.
#10
A peeping tom cat!
#11
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt. Shasta California
Posts: 11,798
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
On the video; RAS in action, on the RAS website , they say they don't add to carrying capacity, they give a better ride, they keep the arch in the spring, they don't affect the ride, they lean less on with a load, ect, which is all contradictory. They are like a president running for office, they say whatever sounds good at the time. It will affect the ride if it stiffens the front arch section at at all. It's like the hype on expensive shocks; all they can possibly do is give you a rougher rider and possibly last a bit longer. Look at the ras in the video; it is almost on the same plane as the front leaf section and it appears to give some assist for the load but is mostly a wrap device. Load assist=rougher ride, no way around it. Probably not enough to notice much though.
#14
On the video; RAS in action, on the RAS website , they say they don't add to carrying capacity, they give a better ride, they keep the arch in the spring, they don't affect the ride, they lean less on with a load, ect, which is all contradictory. They are like a president running for office, they say whatever sounds good at the time. It will affect the ride if it stiffens the front arch section at at all. It's like the hype on expensive shocks; all they can possibly do is give you a rougher rider and possibly last a bit longer. Look at the ras in the video; it is almost on the same plane as the front leaf section and it appears to give some assist for the load but is mostly a wrap device. Load assist= rougher ride, no way around it.
#15
Ryan
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post