Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1991 5.8L engine internals?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-09-2010, 04:24 PM
newstylecustoms's Avatar
newstylecustoms
newstylecustoms is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1991 5.8L engine internals?

I will be acquiring a 5.8L from a 1991 Bronco to install in my 77 F150 EFI and all. I would like to know what to expect for longevity of this engine. Mileage is unknown. My main question is does this engine have cast pistons? I thought the first year for hyperutectic (spelling?) pistons was 1992, anyone know for sure? The reason I ask is if I mod this engine ie GT40 heads and a cam, non-roller I assume, can I expect the pistons to live through it?

Thanks
Matt
 
  #2  
Old 08-09-2010, 04:31 PM
itsasix's Avatar
itsasix
itsasix is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Garage Floor
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It doesnt matter what the piston is made of, itll be fine with the combo you list. Its only when you start throwin a good bit of boost or nitrous at em that the cast and hyper pistons start havin issues. For a HCI motor you can rest assured that itll be ok. As for the rest, the rods are STOUT from the factory. Im almost down puttin together a 12:1 compression 393 stroker for my 90 mustang that is using stock truck 351 rods with ARP studs and im not loosin any sleep. Tear the motor down, inspect it for odd wear patterns and if you have time and $, rebuild it while its out using the stock parts and itll be ready to rock!!! Good luck with it!
Matt
 
  #3  
Old 08-09-2010, 04:53 PM
lew52's Avatar
lew52
lew52 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You should be fine with the cast pistons , i think your thinking about the 302 HO , they had forged pistons till 93 then they went to hyper & the 91 351 will have a flat tappet cam....Lew
 
  #4  
Old 08-09-2010, 05:47 PM
itsasix's Avatar
itsasix
itsasix is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Garage Floor
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah the mustangs had forged pistons till 93 for sure. Dunno bout truck motors and 351s but either way you will be just fine!
Matt
 
  #5  
Old 08-09-2010, 08:20 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,911
Likes: 0
Received 957 Likes on 758 Posts
As far as I know the only 5.8 to get anything but cast pistons was the Lightning and even then they was only hypereutectic. Even so there is nothing to worry about in this motor at lower power levels(under 450hp) unless you get into boost or wind it up past 6500 rpm.
 
  #6  
Old 08-11-2010, 04:11 PM
newstylecustoms's Avatar
newstylecustoms
newstylecustoms is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies. I will probably use it in stock form for a while. I forgot about the head bolt side differences from 5.0 to 5.8, my plan of getting junkyard Gt-40s from an explorer is foiled without paying to have the bolt holes enlarged.

Anyone have any experience with an Explorer roller cam added in an otherwise stock 5.8?
 
  #7  
Old 08-12-2010, 09:55 AM
itsasix's Avatar
itsasix
itsasix is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Garage Floor
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You could do the work yourself on enlarging the holes, or find someone local with a drill press and pay them...sometimes all it takes is a good meal or a case of beer!
Matt
 
  #8  
Old 08-12-2010, 10:16 AM
nflfreak43's Avatar
nflfreak43
nflfreak43 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: May 2008
Location: La Vergne, TN
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by newstylecustoms
Thanks for the replies. I will probably use it in stock form for a while. I forgot about the head bolt side differences from 5.0 to 5.8, my plan of getting junkyard Gt-40s from an explorer is foiled without paying to have the bolt holes enlarged.

Anyone have any experience with an Explorer roller cam added in an otherwise stock 5.8?
dont jump to this conclusion to quick. i got some GT40s off a 96 explorer and my bolts for a 351W fit perfect.

and besides having someone drill out the bold holes shouldnt cost much.
 
  #9  
Old 08-12-2010, 04:09 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,911
Likes: 0
Received 957 Likes on 758 Posts
Originally Posted by newstylecustoms
my plan of getting junkyard Gt-40s from an explorer is foiled without paying to have the bolt holes enlarged.
Have done this myself on my drill press.. it's not difficult at all since the holes are perpendicular to the head gasket surface..

Originally Posted by newstylecustoms
Anyone have any experience with an Explorer roller cam added in an otherwise stock 5.8?
That's what is in the '94+ 5.8 motors, but you'll need some expensive linkbar lifters to put in it the older non-roller block. Besides the Crane 444232 flat tappet is much better suited to the 5.8 and yes it is SD friendly.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freddie Murphy
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
16
10-20-2015 12:46 PM
Ecarlton1991
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
08-14-2011 06:20 PM
rockcrawler_101
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
8
11-16-2009 04:03 PM
ckchevyman26
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
08-18-2003 11:45 AM



Quick Reply: 1991 5.8L engine internals?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.