Thinking of changing my 351M for a 351C

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-28-2003, 09:59 AM
79f250&70Mustang's Avatar
79f250&70Mustang
79f250&70Mustang is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thinking of changing my 351M for a 351C

Would this make much difference?

I have a '72 <a href="http://www.motorhaven.com/">351c </a>4bolt main 4bbl closed-chamber heads engine that I was thinking of changing for my '75 <a href="http://www.motorhaven.com/">351m </a>2bbl but am not sure that it would make much difference.

What do you all think?
Thanks
 
  #2  
Old 03-28-2003, 10:31 AM
8mmag's Avatar
8mmag
8mmag is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thinking of changing my 351M for a 351C

You'll notice the difference...it'll feel like you have (2) 351M's in there!

I put a 2 bbl <a href="http://www.motorhaven.com/">351c </a>in a '67 Mustang I had and was disappointed in the performance compared to a 4 bbl 289.

Later I got a 70 Mach I w/ a 4 bbl 351C. There is NO comparision. The 4 bbl <a href="http://www.motorhaven.com/">351c </a>rules!

When I rebuilt it, I ran 11:1 TRW forged pistons (stock CR), stock intake for good low-midrange torque, <a href="http://www.motorhaven.com/">Holley</a> 650 dbl pumper, TRW cam w/ about .513 lift and 310 deg. duration, 1 7/8" headers into 2.5" dual exaust w/ turbo mufflers and a cross tube just back of the headers. This probably added another 60-80 hp and was quite noticable.

With the <a href="http://www.motorhaven.com/">Holley</a>, it got 15-16MPG on the highway. When I was going a long distance though, I'd put the stock carb back on and could get about 19MPG at 75-80 MPH.

Go for it!

Tom
 
  #3  
Old 03-29-2003, 01:15 PM
Coondawg's Avatar
Coondawg
Coondawg is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saraland AL
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thinking of changing my 351M for a 351C

Just remember, the bellhousings are different.
 
  #4  
Old 03-30-2003, 12:44 AM
Brian S's Avatar
Brian S
Brian S is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thinking of changing my 351M for a 351C

What vehicle is this for? Any emission issues to deal with? You want torque rather than horsepower for heavy vehicles. Weight and gearing makes or breaks the <a href="http://www.motorhaven.com/">351c </a>4V performance. The easiest way to make torque is displacement and a 400 or 400 stroker is cheap and easy, you don't have to deal with different bell housings, motor mounts or exhaust manifolds. Don't worry about gas mileage, a 351 4V isn't known for it's great gas mileage.
 
  #5  
Old 03-30-2003, 06:02 AM
NewHolland's Avatar
NewHolland
NewHolland is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: hayward usa
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thinking of changing my 351M for a 351C

The <a href="http://www.motorhaven.com/">351c </a>does rule in top end horses..But remember the mounts and the bellhousing are different than the M..And this could turn into a changeover nite mare without all the right stuff.You could spend the money on a good performance hop up on the M and be happy with less headaches.If money wasn,t an object you could put the 4vC heads on the 400 block with a speciality intake adaptor and end up with a monster with proper cammng! watch which pistons you use because those 4v heads are small chambered and raise the octane needs up there.Also the exhaust manifolds would have to be off of the 4v or special headers made up.the <a href="http://www.motorhaven.com/">351c </a>ones will not work always due to the taller deck height..If it was my choice I would save the C for some special Hi-Po project and spend the money on the M and make it a 400 too if its not.Less headaches.done Ford projects for 20 some years.the ones I liked the best were the ones that got done in timely matter because the stuff fit.
 
  #6  
Old 03-30-2003, 06:05 AM
NewHolland's Avatar
NewHolland
NewHolland is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: hayward usa
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thinking of changing my 351M for a 351C

Hmm too long..must be a wind bag huh?:>)If you were starting with a <a href="http://www.motorhaven.com/">302 </a>or 351 windsor I would tackle it with the C.but the M makes it a harder project.Specially if its a 4wd truck.the 400 can be fun to build too,and its different..But then again..All things can be done with time and money!! And this is America!! good luck.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ba 302
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
9
03-12-2009 03:59 PM
oldford2
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
9
04-03-2003 10:23 AM
hawk250
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
1
04-02-2003 07:42 PM
orangeford
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
12
04-01-2003 10:54 AM
Seabeetough
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
2
03-26-2003 10:10 PM



Quick Reply: Thinking of changing my 351M for a 351C



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 PM.