BW transfer case output flange style
#1
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greater Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,295
Likes: 0
Received 351 Likes
on
282 Posts
BW transfer case output flange style
I am very slowly repowering my '91 SAE Bronco with a 4.6L Triton V8 and 4R70W transmission from a 1997 F150. I am using a BW1356 manual shift xfer case and I've run into a snag on the driveshaft. I obtained a driveshaft from a Bronco with an AOD trans (my Bronco had the E4OD) which is the correct length, but the flange where it bolts to the xfer case is different. Both driveshafts have a double-cardan joint here, but the AOD shaft has the type of u-joint that bolts to a yoke on the xfer case, whereas the E4OD shaft has it's own flange that bolts to the xfer case flange. My xfer case is set up to take the latter so I had planned to just pull the flange off of the old shaft but the dang ball joint in the middle is different.
The easiest thing to do would be to find a yoke for my xfer case that will take the AOD shaft, but I have never seen one of these before with a double-cardan joint on it. What years would this be on? Is this going to be on the BW1346 case maybe? I can get pics if that is needed.
The easiest thing to do would be to find a yoke for my xfer case that will take the AOD shaft, but I have never seen one of these before with a double-cardan joint on it. What years would this be on? Is this going to be on the BW1346 case maybe? I can get pics if that is needed.
#2
The transmission has nothing to do with it. In 90' Ford went to the flange style on the T-case. The problem is the shaft that the flange goes on is slightly bigger than the one that the yoke goes on. You can put a flange on an older case in a pinch, but you cant put a yoke on a newer case. It is a very small differnce. The problem with putting a flange on the older case is there is a little play there. I did it and ran it for about 1000 miles till I rebuilt my original case. The flange style is better IMHO because it's much eazier to work on. The thing I dont understand is you said that you have a driveshaft from a AOD that is the correct length for an E40D. They are not the same length. The shaft for the E40D is much shorter.
#3
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greater Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,295
Likes: 0
Received 351 Likes
on
282 Posts
No, what I said was I have a shaft from an AOD which is the correct length, because 4R70W = AOD. The E4OD shaft is too short. The AOD shaft takes the yoke but my '91 xfer case has the flange and I cannot put the flange from my E4OD shaft on the AOD shaft because the cardan joints are not compatible.
In any case, you answered my question, I can't just put a yoke on my BW1356, right?
In any case, you answered my question, I can't just put a yoke on my BW1356, right?
#4
#5
I really think your best bet is going to get the E4OD shaft lengthened. Even if you figure out what exact shaft you need and what Broncos (I doubt any F-series shaft will be the right length) it came in, you're going to look long and hard for one because most wrecking yards destroy them moving vehicles around.
#6
I happen to have a T-case with the yoke. I rebuilt it. (new plastic inserts in the shift forks) I would be willing to trade you for your flange T-case. Or sell you it for $100. I see you are in Austin. I'm in Florida, but I drive to Houma, La every month for two weeks. (work) I could bring it that far. If you want it, I leave tomarrow. I even have some friends at work that live in Austin that might bring it there. But I would have to check with them. I couldnt arrange it this trip. Let me know.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
The output shaft in the BW1356 with the flange is .020" bigger than the same transfer case that is set up for the yoke-to-yoke output to the rear drive shaft as helirich explained. You can go to the trouble of swapping output shafts if you can find one but then it would make more sense to just swap t-cases.
I agree with termyt100, what's the urge to drop a 4.6 into a Bronco?
I agree with termyt100, what's the urge to drop a 4.6 into a Bronco?
#9
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greater Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,295
Likes: 0
Received 351 Likes
on
282 Posts
I agree with termyt100, what's the urge to drop a 4.6 into a Bronco?
#10
'Nuff said. Keep us in the loop as to how it turns out. Considering that a 4.6 would be the second-smallest (displacement) engine I've ever heard of in a Bronco... The smallest being the 170 (2.8L) I6 that came in the originals... I'm curious to hear what kind of performance/mileage you get out of it.
#11
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greater Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,295
Likes: 0
Received 351 Likes
on
282 Posts
I happen to have a T-case with the yoke. I rebuilt it. (new plastic inserts in the shift forks) I would be willing to trade you for your flange T-case. Or sell you it for $100. I see you are in Austin. I'm in Florida, but I drive to Houma, La every month for two weeks. (work) I could bring it that far. If you want it, I leave tomarrow. I even have some friends at work that live in Austin that might bring it there. But I would have to check with them. I couldnt arrange it this trip. Let me know.
#12
#13
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greater Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,295
Likes: 0
Received 351 Likes
on
282 Posts
Should be pretty reasonable, there are only a few tools involved and it's not a difficult job. If you bring in a piece of scrap driveshaft they can use to lengthen it might save you a few bucks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fordiesel69
2004 - 2008 F150
4
09-20-2014 08:08 AM
lastclodstanding
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
01-25-2012 07:32 AM
l67cooled
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
12-29-2009 04:53 PM