Whoever has done 2WD ZF Swap
#1
Whoever has done 2WD ZF Swap
I have a 96 F150 2WD short wheelbase with the M5R2. I have read here and other forums many posts on swapping to a ZF. I think I have most items resolved except for two items. Is getting a two piece ZF driveshaft and getting it shorten the best way to go? Is the tunnel cover different between the two trans?
#2
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greater Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,300
Likes: 0
Received 355 Likes
on
285 Posts
The tunnel cover is not different. I have heard that the rear mount is different, and I have heard it is not different. The one I have is very different than what was in my truck, but my truck was converted from auto, so that doesn't count.
You don't have to get a 2-piece driveshaft, you just need to convert your driveshaft from the slip yoke you have now to the flange the ZF uses.
You don't have to get a 2-piece driveshaft, you just need to convert your driveshaft from the slip yoke you have now to the flange the ZF uses.
#3
#5
If you use a single piece driveshaft, it must have a slip joint to work with the fixed yoke on the ZF. I'm not sure how well or if Ford ever used a two piece driveshaft on a short wheelbase truck (I assume standard cab, short bed?). The transmission crossmemeber is the same as the Mazda - I used one from an '95 F150 in my '87 under the ZF. The isolator (rubber mount) should also be the same and should transfer to the ZF. I got the tunnel cover out of the same truck, so it will also work fine with the ZF.
#6
Thanks for the reply. That is my concern in regards to the slip joint, there needs to be some "play" when wheels go over a bump,and the reason for the two-piece question, yes(standard cab,short bed). I have located a ZF locally already out(private owner) but he doesn't have the orginal driveshaft.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greater Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,300
Likes: 0
Received 355 Likes
on
285 Posts
If you use a single piece driveshaft, it must have a slip joint to work with the fixed yoke on the ZF.
#9
Here's two, are they close enough for you? ;)
http://www.panix.com/~alvinj/file12/zfyoke.jpg
Maybe you'll like this one better...
http://www.panix.com/~alvinj/file12/Bronco2wd.jpg
...that's a 2wd ZF in a Bronco.
Alvin in AZ
http://www.panix.com/~alvinj/file12/zfyoke.jpg
Maybe you'll like this one better...
http://www.panix.com/~alvinj/file12/Bronco2wd.jpg
...that's a 2wd ZF in a Bronco.
Alvin in AZ
#10
#11
I now have the trans. After reading somemore I'm thinking a long wheelbase 4WD slip-joint rear shaft or the rear from a F250 which has a slipjoint might work. Granted more than likely I'll have to have some work done on them before it fits correctly. Since I have the short wheelbase(117 inch), maybe I will have a few more options as far as length is concerned. Thanks again for all the help.
#12
used instead of 1+1/8" caps. The mechanic ruined the ZF's yoke and the
10.25's yoke both. :/ Title and/or pay does not a good mechanic make. ;)
I flat don't know anything about that driveshaft. :/ I took some driveshaft
parts in and told him the length I needed and he just happened to have
that one hanging on the wall! LOL :)
Looked to be a custom job that wasn't picked up on time to me. :/
Dusty, tagged and ready to go.
...the length -and- one end was already perfect, so Wade Simmonds just
changed the caps from 1+1/16" to 1+1/8" (on the one end) and I was out
of there without paying a penny.
IME, don't fret the driveshaft work. It'll be money well spent, -if you want
it to run nice and smooth down the freeway. BTDT and paid cash even. ;)
Alvin in AZ
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jjona5
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
12-11-2016 09:27 PM
'97f350supercab
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
12-04-2016 08:06 AM