6.2L V8 Discuss the 6.2L V8

Ford Rethinks Big Block V8s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-23-2008, 01:53 PM
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Mark Kovalsky is offline
Fleet Owner

Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 23,240
Received 1,571 Likes on 1,049 Posts
  #2  
Old 06-23-2008, 04:23 PM
boxcar1974's Avatar
boxcar1974
boxcar1974 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Makes sence to me. Truck sales are way down and gas prices are way up. They should to the cheapest most efficient route. If that means a new V8 that has adequate power with a increase by 10-20% in fuel effeciency that is what they should do.

We have to supreme obligation to reduce our dependance on foriegn oil. I think the puffing your chest out engine wars is stupid. Do whats right for the situation at hand.
 
  #3  
Old 06-23-2008, 09:47 PM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 297 Likes on 156 Posts
I shoulda started a pool... Seriously, did I call this one, or WHAT?

If they add direct-injection to the 3-valve 4.6L heads, it'll work in the V10 too...
 
  #4  
Old 06-23-2008, 10:56 PM
Raider50's Avatar
Raider50
Raider50 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Buffalo, Wyoming
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well them saying it will be "as fuel efficient as possible" says twin turbo direct injection ecoboost 5.4 to me. I am ok losing the 6.2 as long as a ecoboost 5.4 is available. However a ecoboost v10 would replace ever needing viagra in my book. This is just wishful thinking on my part, but maybe the ecoboost on the larger motors could be called boss just to make some of us happy to be able to say weve got a boss when the other guy says hes got a hemi.
 
  #5  
Old 06-24-2008, 10:16 AM
tjthegreat's Avatar
tjthegreat
tjthegreat is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Wayne IN
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
can some1 explain ecoboost to me?
 
  #6  
Old 06-24-2008, 10:18 AM
jasongt06's Avatar
jasongt06
jasongt06 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ecoboost is applying twin turbochargers to these engines to make up for lack of displacement.
 
  #7  
Old 06-24-2008, 11:20 AM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 297 Likes on 156 Posts
Along with direct injection.
 
  #8  
Old 06-25-2008, 11:37 PM
fordtruckman's Avatar
fordtruckman
fordtruckman is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kzoo
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm thinking turbochargers are the way to go, most will complain that there is no replacement for displacement but i say there needs to be.
 
  #9  
Old 06-26-2008, 01:53 AM
tjthegreat's Avatar
tjthegreat
tjthegreat is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Wayne IN
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
o sounds pretty simple
 
  #10  
Old 06-27-2008, 10:52 AM
Fosters's Avatar
Fosters
Fosters is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fordtruckman
I'm thinking turbochargers are the way to go, most will complain that there is no replacement for displacement but i say there needs to be.
turbochargers don't exactly create power out of just air either...
 
  #11  
Old 07-04-2008, 10:23 PM
mustange70's Avatar
mustange70
mustange70 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Coutts Canada
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But the efficency of the engine goes way up, as turbos turn waste heat (ie energy) into power, ie. more power per gallon of gas with the similar mileage, more displacement will eat gas quicker then a turbo would as well (if everything is setup properly).
 
  #12  
Old 07-06-2008, 06:21 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Turbos don't produce power from heat. They produce power from moving air/gases from the exhaust. Heat is the enemy of making power with any forced induction. Thats why intercoolers and water/meth injection can up the power significantly by reducing temps. All the turbo problems Ford has had in diesels makes me very warry of the turbos in the ecoboost. I guess we'll see how it turns out.


IMO Ford should drop the 4.4l diesel as well, even though many people think it will be the best thing in the world. I just think it would be a hard sell right now.
 
  #13  
Old 07-06-2008, 06:25 PM
tjthegreat's Avatar
tjthegreat
tjthegreat is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Wayne IN
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they should just put a 4cyl diesel in the f150,it would be powerful enough and it would get really good mpgs
 
  #14  
Old 07-07-2008, 11:02 PM
92f150I6's Avatar
92f150I6
92f150I6 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tjthegreat
they should just put a 4cyl diesel in the f150,it would be powerful enough and it would get really good mpgs

I really don't know if that is what should be done. Until Diesels respond like gassers, are cost competitive with gassers, and don't cost a bunch to maintain, then maybe they will take off. Right now with the cost of the diesel engine so high as well as cost of fuel, I'd never buy one.
 
  #15  
Old 07-08-2008, 10:39 AM
tjthegreat's Avatar
tjthegreat
tjthegreat is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Wayne IN
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
same with me i really dont think they should make one at all let alone the 4.4 v8 diesel
 


Quick Reply: Ford Rethinks Big Block V8s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 PM.