The wrong harmonic balancer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-31-2010, 10:08 PM
HOME WORKS's Avatar
HOME WORKS
HOME WORKS is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question The wrong harmonic balancer?

Ok, I checked the #'s for my balancer and it's a 28oz. My engine is a 1991 302 with a few perfomance parts ie. RPM Performer heads & Edel. 2 x 4 intake & MSD ignition. It's mated to a t-5 also.
I got the engine as is from the previous owner and just fired it up recently and found the timing marks to be nowhere near the pointer. While determining true TDC I thought I'd verifie the balancer being correct,
So my question: is there any reason to use a 28 oz. balancer instead of the 50 oz.
Thanks in advance for your input, David
 
  #2  
Old 05-31-2010, 11:37 PM
littlehusky's Avatar
littlehusky
littlehusky is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is it a 5.0 HO or a Truck engine?
I/E what is your firing order?
 
  #3  
Old 06-01-2010, 12:22 AM
Handegard's Avatar
Handegard
Handegard is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HOME WORKS
Ok, I checked the #'s for my balancer and it's a 28oz. My engine is a 1991 302 with a few perfomance parts ie. RPM Performer heads & Edel. 2 x 4 intake & MSD ignition. It's mated to a t-5 also.
I got the engine as is from the previous owner and just fired it up recently and found the timing marks to be nowhere near the pointer. While determining true TDC I thought I'd verifie the balancer being correct,
So my question: is there any reason to use a 28 oz. balancer instead of the 50 oz.
Thanks in advance for your input, David
Are you positive it's not a 28oz crank and flexplate?

It's possibly if the engine was replaced that someone grabbed a older one....

The 28ox balancer, crank, and flywheel/flexplate are a combo. They aren't supposed to be mixed and matched...
 
  #4  
Old 06-01-2010, 06:38 AM
HOME WORKS's Avatar
HOME WORKS
HOME WORKS is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The engine ID# indicates 1991 t-bird. The PO got the engine in a mustang he planned to drag race but decided to replace it after a short time with a stroker. The engine has been rebuilt.I've had the oil pan off and checked the rod & main bearings. They are marked standard and the crank has #E7AE-AA on it. The pistons are TRW (on the bottom) supposed to be 10 over? The cylinders still show the cross hatched patern and the pistons and rods show the grinding & drilling signs from balancing.
I purchased the t-5, along with all the necessary parts to install it ie. bell housing, pedal assembly, driveshaft, new flywheel etc. The flywheel is 157 tooth which I understand to be the 50oz. I'm pretty sure the PO had the engine hooked to an automatic trans.
Am I safe to just install a new 50oz. balancer and not worry about it?
By the way this engine is going into a 32 ford roadster I'm building.
Thanks everyone, David
 
  #5  
Old 06-01-2010, 06:52 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
What is the Ford ID number marked on the harmonic balancer?

What number did you find on the engine that points to a 1991 T-Bird?
 
  #6  
Old 06-01-2010, 11:58 AM
HOME WORKS's Avatar
HOME WORKS
HOME WORKS is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey NUMBER DUMMY,
The balancer is Is from C.A.T. Performance Engine Parts # HBF 302C
and the engine # next to the starter location reads F1SE BB
 
  #7  
Old 06-01-2010, 08:10 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by HOME WORKS
Hey NUMBER DUMMY,
The balancer is Is from C.A.T. Performance Engine Parts # HBF 302C
and the engine # next to the starter location reads F1SE BB
Just because the bare block casting number is 1991 T-Bird related, does not mean the engine was only used in T-Birds, or in 1991 only.

Casting numbers cannot be cross referenced to Ford part numbers, cannot be used to ID the size of the engine, or what it is from. Basically they are worthless.

So you are only assuming the block is from a Bird. It could be from a Mustang, Mark, Crown Vic, Grand Marquis, T-Bird/Cougar, Town Car.

The crankshaft ID number of E7AE-AA was Ford part number E7AZ6303A which was replaced by E4ZZ6303A and used in darn near every 302 from 1987 thru 2004.
 
  #8  
Old 06-01-2010, 09:21 PM
HOME WORKS's Avatar
HOME WORKS
HOME WORKS is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NumberDummy<
I don't want to offend you or appear to not be thankfull of your help but if you go back to my original post you will find that my question is: Is there a logical reason to use a 28 oz balancer on a late 80's / early 90's 5.0 instead of the 50 oz.
I don't believe the model of car the engine came in from ford has anything to do with my balancer concern.
Thanks again for your input, David
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Robbie58
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
32
08-07-2022 11:22 AM
beartracks
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
6
07-12-2016 11:20 AM
eBronc3
1966 - 1977 Early Broncos
2
11-05-2015 05:38 PM
TireDood
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
03-25-2015 10:03 AM
mauicruza
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
26
12-24-2012 08:02 AM



Quick Reply: The wrong harmonic balancer?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 AM.