Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-25-2010, 01:33 AM
alconk alconk is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 557
alconk is starting off with a positive reputation.
302 Fuel Mileage??

Ok I've been reading a few post about there mileage being down on the 360/390 of around 10-12 mpg. Well I have a 302 in my 79 sb with a Edel. 600, headers and dual exhaust. Nothing else, stock rear gear (3.25) stock size tires and no emissionns. I get between 11-12.5 and that's on the highway and I baby it. It's all tuned up, no sticking rear drums so what gives for a measly 302. Why such crapy mileage?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-25-2010, 06:57 AM
r0880's Avatar
r0880 r0880 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 18
r0880 is starting off with a positive reputation.
rlaurie1
I get 20mpg on highway on all stock 302/carby/exhaust in all standard truck, long bed.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-25-2010, 08:07 AM
fmc400's Avatar
fmc400 fmc400 is offline
MSEE
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,290
fmc400 has much to be proud offmc400 has much to be proud offmc400 has much to be proud offmc400 has much to be proud offmc400 has much to be proud offmc400 has much to be proud offmc400 has much to be proud offmc400 has much to be proud offmc400 has much to be proud of
If you've ripped out EGR, it will account for some mileage loss. Also, a 4-barrel is more efficient in theory, but it does need to be carefully tuned to realize better mileage (not saying you haven't already). Given the factors, it's not surprising to me that people with completely stock trucks are realizing better mileage. Also, "babying it" is really hard to define.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-25-2010, 09:41 AM
Shane in WI Shane in WI is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 329
Shane in WI is starting off with a positive reputation.
My 77 F100 2wd Explorer, 302, 3-speed, 3:00 open rear, headers, was getting 6 and 8 mpg last fall. This spring I installed a new gas tank and rebuilt the 2 barrel carb and just checked my second tank last night and got 9.6 mpg. I have not gotten the carb fine tuned, but everything else is working properly. I'm alittle disappointed with the mileage as well. But 10 is better than 6. I would have expected 12 to 14. But I've been on all short trips, no highway miles.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-25-2010, 10:59 AM
alconk alconk is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 557
alconk is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fmc400 View Post
If you've ripped out EGR, it will account for some mileage loss. Also, a 4-barrel is more efficient in theory, but it does need to be carefully tuned to realize better mileage (not saying you haven't already). Given the factors, it's not surprising to me that people with completely stock trucks are realizing better mileage. Also, "babying it" is really hard to define.
What I mean by baby it is no aggressive starts, no getting into the secondaries. I did however play with the jets in the carb and was loving the extra power but could not afford the fuel loss because it would go fast, so I put everything back to the "economy" setup. And ya the egr has been long gone.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-25-2010, 11:14 AM
jeddi03 jeddi03 is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 47
jeddi03 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have a 1977 f-100 stepside with a 302, headers, holley 500 cfm 2 barrel, no egr, and I get 23 - 24 highway. The gearing is stock and i am rolling at 3000 rpm at 65 mph. looking to change the ring and pinon to get the revs down to 2500 - 2600 at highway speeds to help with the economy.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-25-2010, 11:29 AM
Shane in WI Shane in WI is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 329
Shane in WI is starting off with a positive reputation.
My truck has the egr and charcoal canister hooked up, but little else for emissions. No PS,PB, or AC options. Going to get some help fine tuning the carb and see. Runs and sounds pretty good as is. Seems it should be doing better the way it's set up.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-25-2010, 01:25 PM
79Indy's Avatar
79Indy 79Indy is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 236
79Indy is starting off with a positive reputation.
I get 11 around town, 15 or so on the highway. Originally it was 2.75 gears. Now it has 3.50's. There was no change in mileage and the 302 is much happier spinning down the highway than lugging. I have all the emmisions, but have the timing advanced, some slightly larger jets in the 2150, a high flow cat and a Flowmaster.
__________________
'79 F150 Indy 500 Pace Truck Edition
302/C6/9"
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 01:25 PM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks

Tags
100, 302, 64, block, efficency, engine, f150, ford, fuel, improve, mileage, motor, mpg, small, truck

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup