Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-14-2010, 08:43 AM
compman's Avatar
compman compman is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 25
compman is starting off with a positive reputation.
1988 351w EFI motor...what can you tell me?

I found a low mileage rebuilt, perfect running EFI 351w in a 1988 Bronco for less than I could even rebuild the heads on my weak '83 351w. I'm getting the engine next weekend, but out of curiousity I tried to find the engine specs and can't find much of anything. I believe this engine uses the same cam as the 84-86 351 HO (206/221@.050, 114 lsa, 115 ica), and maybe the E7 heads, but I'm not sure. Any idea on the factory rated compression ratio? I'm guessing about 9.0-1. I believe the factory power rating is 200hp/315tq...quite a step up from my 139hp/278tq monster
Also, I will be reusing my edlebrock 2181 performer intake and 600 holley carb and Mallory HEI ignition. Do you think this would bump the power output up any over the factory EFI setup? I also picked up a set of used hooker full length headers with 1 1/2" tubes and 2 1/2" collectors. Will these headers and a set of dual 2 1/2" exhaust make a significant difference on these things, with the weak factory heads? Has anybody ever tried advancing the stock cam 4*, and what was the result? I want to pull the heads and do some mild porting on them and remove that big bump out of the exhaust port too. With mild porting, the headers, performer, and 600 holley, what kind of output could I expect?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-14-2010, 10:26 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 20,416
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
An all stock '88 EFI motor will have a puny little bumpstick not the 351HO cam, so if you have any plans to go inside the motor at all I highly recommend you change it. This motor will have E7TE heads and a nominal CR of 8.8-9:1. If you use a carb setup the Comp cams 35-234-3 or 34-238-3 are what you want, use the 238 if you have more gearing in the vehicle and the 234 with less gearing. If you stick with EFI you need the 35-255-5.

Simply swapping a carb onto the stock motor will make no difference at all, the EFI intakes are not restrictive it's all about the cam. The factory exhaust systems were a hugh cork too so headers will bring solid power gains for all combos.

Advancing the stock cam won't make any difference worth talking about and an aftermarket cam should be installed straight up. The EFI setup with the recommended cam and longtubes will make about 260-275hp with a big flat TQ curve up around 380ft/lbs from idle up, and the carb combos will make 275-300hp depending how good a porting job you do.
__________________
Paul (Conan) O'Brien

1990 5.0HO AOD XLT X-Cab F150 3.55LS, 1994 3.0L 5-sp x-cab Ranger 3.45, 2004 3.0L 5-sp X-cab Ranger Edge 4.10, 2004 2.5L 5-spd Subaru Legacy
1996 Kawasaki ZX11D, 2004 Honda 599, 2008 Kawasaki KLR650
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-14-2010, 11:10 AM
loudfords's Avatar
loudfords loudfords is offline
FTE Chapter Leader
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Beachville, Ontario
Posts: 3,618
loudfords has a good reputation on FTE.loudfords has a good reputation on FTE.
Swap the cam. I have an 88 351w in my 79, stock bottom end including cam, with Edelbrock intake & carb, and the cam is not that great for a carb...
__________________
Chad - loudfords - Ontario Chapter Leader
Click HERE to join the Ontario Chapter

1979 F150 351W
2003 Explorer XLT
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-28-2010, 02:59 AM
compman's Avatar
compman compman is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 25
compman is starting off with a positive reputation.
ok...

Ok...got the 351w home and started checking things out. I can't find the casting numbers on the heads (???)...they are just marked with a big "T" in several different places, with what I believe to be a casting date of 7K15 (November 15, 1987 ???). The stock cam measures about .280 on the intake lobe and .285 on the exhaust lobe, which figuring for the factory rated 1.6 ratio rockers equals .448 intake/.456 exhaust. Sounds pretty darn close to the 351HO cam to me. I haven't thrown a degree wheel on it yet, but everything I found shows that this engine should have the 351HO cam in it.

I haven't pulled the heads yet to check their condition as well as see what the bores and pistons look like, but one very notable difference for the much greater factory power rating over my '83 engine is the exhaust manifolds. Where the '83 stockers have a 1 3/4" (measured) outlet on them, these '88 factory bronco units have what appears to be an almost 2 1/2" outlet. The bronco downpipes where quite a bit bigger than my '83's, as well as the factory single exhaust on the bronco appeared to be a 3" system over my 2 1/2" factory single exhaust. Bigger cam, better heads, a bit more compression, and better exhaust...no wonder these things are rated at 70+ hp more than the '83 model.

Where can I fond some good info for porting the E7 heads? I am thinking seriously about using a comp cams retrofit roller cam, probably the 218/224 cam with a set of howards retro fit roller lifters. Any idea approx what pushrod length to start with to get me close?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-24-2014, 08:14 PM
07terry 07terry is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 6
07terry is starting off with a positive reputation.
can someone help with what could cause a 88 351 FI to load up like a carb engine
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-24-2014, 08:21 PM
Charlie5280 Charlie5280 is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 29
Charlie5280 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 07terry View Post
can someone help with what could cause a 88 351 FI to load up like a carb engine
Leaking/Clogged fuel injectors
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-24-2014, 09:29 PM
07terry 07terry is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 6
07terry is starting off with a positive reputation.
how would i find out which ones by trouble shooting
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-03-2014, 10:41 AM
RobFox RobFox is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Suffolk County
Posts: 24
RobFox is starting off with a positive reputation.
Psychostang84
90 351w

Hello, would the same go for a 90 F250 351w?
Also, would I be better off with Edelbrock Rpm 302 Heads or the stock 351 heads beefed up a little? This will be for a Mustang.

Thank You in advance,
Rob.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-03-2014, 04:28 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 20,416
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
Stock heads are way too small for this displacement and fully ported would not match the flow potential of Edelbrock Performers.
__________________
Paul (Conan) O'Brien

1990 5.0HO AOD XLT X-Cab F150 3.55LS, 1994 3.0L 5-sp x-cab Ranger 3.45, 2004 3.0L 5-sp X-cab Ranger Edge 4.10, 2004 2.5L 5-spd Subaru Legacy
1996 Kawasaki ZX11D, 2004 Honda 599, 2008 Kawasaki KLR650
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-03-2014, 04:47 PM
RobFox RobFox is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Suffolk County
Posts: 24
RobFox is starting off with a positive reputation.
Psychostang84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conanski View Post
Stock heads are way too small for this displacement and fully ported would not match the flow potential of Edelbrock Performers.
Great, Thank You.

And as for an 88 351, same specs as a 90 by chance?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-03-2014, 05:10 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 20,416
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
Yes same specs from '87 to '93, in '94 the motor got a roller cam but otherwise is the same.
__________________
Paul (Conan) O'Brien

1990 5.0HO AOD XLT X-Cab F150 3.55LS, 1994 3.0L 5-sp x-cab Ranger 3.45, 2004 3.0L 5-sp X-cab Ranger Edge 4.10, 2004 2.5L 5-spd Subaru Legacy
1996 Kawasaki ZX11D, 2004 Honda 599, 2008 Kawasaki KLR650
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-03-2014, 05:19 PM
RobFox RobFox is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Suffolk County
Posts: 24
RobFox is starting off with a positive reputation.
Psychostang84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conanski View Post
Yes same specs from '87 to '93, in '94 the motor got a roller cam but otherwise is the same.
Good to know, Thanks Again!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 05:19 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)

Tags
1988, 302, 351, 351w, 88, efi, f150, ford, headers, kind, make, motor, power, remove, stock, truck, windsor

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
351W Camshaft Selection Rusty_S Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 27 12-25-2013 10:51 AM
What do you think my hp will be on my 351w screaminford Performance & General Engine Building 5 04-20-2012 04:12 PM
hp and tq ? 1bad67sbf Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 47 05-07-2010 09:08 PM
351w upgrades questions compman Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 5 03-30-2009 04:13 PM
Mild 351w performance upgrades compman Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 1 06-20-2008 09:59 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup