Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

91 351w rebuild/upgrade question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-03-2010, 10:49 PM
Chris68GT's Avatar
Chris68GT
Chris68GT is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
91 351w rebuild/upgrade question

I'm planning on rebuilding my 351w in my 91 F150 Lariat EFI. I'm also planning some up grades.

.040 over 351 with a zero decked block.
GT-40 heads
Crane 444232 Cam (.448/.464 Lift) (206/214 @ .050) (114 LSA)
Stock intake
1 5/8 Shorty headers

My question is will this setup work with the factory speed density EFI setup? Also, what timing chain should I get and where should I install it as far as cam/crank centerline? I would like to advance the cam to get some more toque out of it but I'm pretty sure it would freak the computer out.
 
  #2  
Old 05-04-2010, 08:17 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,919
Likes: 0
Received 960 Likes on 760 Posts
That should work but there are no guarantees, there is a guy here with the same combo and he has had some problems with it. I have the same cam in my 5.8 but my truck is also mass air. Where are you getting that cam BTW.. Crane is long gone and any leftover supply has dried up.. or are they back in business again? If you do have one install it straight up.. the cam produces lots of TQ as it is and the GT40 heads will only improve that.
 
  #3  
Old 05-04-2010, 09:16 PM
Chris68GT's Avatar
Chris68GT
Chris68GT is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm assuming the issues the guy is having are drive ability issues or idle/stalling issues? I would like to avoid these and I'm now leaning towards a set of E7's with the exhaust ports opened a bit (bumps ground down) same cam and a set of headers. the cam seems to be available from summit racing. Last I heard S&S Cycle bought out the rest of crane re-opened it, I could be wrong though.

I am kinda on a tight budget so most mass-air swaps are kinda out of the question unless there is a computer out there out of a truck with a 5.8, mass air and an E4OD that I can change the pin-outs and install a mass-air and harness, I'm pretty sure I'd be a new injector harness too, correct?

Another idea I had was installing a first gen lightning computer, as it would already be calibrated for the GT-40 heads and shorty headers plus it has a better program for the trans.

My expertise lies in carbureted combos and I'm really just rambling and looking for someone more experienced in this speed density to offer advice and bounce ideas off of.
 
  #4  
Old 05-04-2010, 09:35 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,919
Likes: 0
Received 960 Likes on 760 Posts
We never did find out exactly what was causing the problems with the other guys truck.. I believe he is now in the middle of a MAF conversion as nothing else has helped. But the motor did run well at one point and there have been others that have done similar mods with no major issues so who knows what happened there.
The E4OD in your truck does make things more complicated, a Lightning EEC would be a good idea if you could find one.. but if you do decide to try a MAF conversion you can use a 5.0 EEC with a matching MAF meter too, and you need the MAF and Injector wiring to add to your harness.
I had heard about S&S Cycles buying Crane about a year ago but have yet to see any anouncement that they were officially back in business, it would be great if they are because Crane had several really nice truck cams. I can say enough about the 444232 in the 5.8... my motor never ceased to amaze me at the TQ it generated, I'm dying to get it back together with the new heads and intake I have for it this 5.0 just isn't enough for a 5000lb truck.
 
  #5  
Old 05-04-2010, 10:18 PM
Chris68GT's Avatar
Chris68GT
Chris68GT is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, I thought I had read something about them being back in business but I may be wrong. This truck is used to tow my open trailer and race car so I'm just looking for more toque out of her, not building a race truck. I wonder if the pin-outs are the same for the Lightning (93-94) EEC as my 91.
 
  #6  
Old 12-01-2014, 06:39 AM
lisagoud's Avatar
lisagoud
lisagoud is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
will the non-gt40 intake line up with intake ports on the GT40P heads?
 
  #7  
Old 12-01-2014, 10:11 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,919
Likes: 0
Received 960 Likes on 760 Posts
Originally Posted by lisagoud
will the non-gt40 intake line up with intake ports on the GT40P heads?
There is nothing unique about GT40 heads in terms of port location so the answer is yes.. any OEM or aftermarket 351/5.8 intake will bolt right on.
 
  #8  
Old 12-01-2014, 11:37 AM
lisagoud's Avatar
lisagoud
lisagoud is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you Paul...I was thinking they could be like the 7.5 efi problem (efi won't bolt on to non-efi heads due to intake port differences...Thanks again for straightening that out. I guess the only thing different on the Gt--40's is the exhaust manifollds?
 
  #9  
Old 12-01-2014, 12:44 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,919
Likes: 0
Received 960 Likes on 760 Posts
No.. No difference on the exhaust side either.
 
  #10  
Old 12-01-2014, 02:46 PM
Island Time's Avatar
Island Time
Island Time is offline
Laughing Gas

Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Orcas Island, WA
Posts: 868
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by lisagoud
I guess the only thing different on the Gt--40's is the exhaust manifollds?
I think your confusing the GT40 with the GT40P. The GT40P has different exhaust ports.
 
  #11  
Old 12-01-2014, 03:42 PM
lisagoud's Avatar
lisagoud
lisagoud is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
exhaust manifolds

sp both the GT40's and the Gt40P take the factory intake manifold?
the GT40's take the regular exhaust manfold while the GT40P takes the unique exhaust manifold?
Why the big deal for the lighting intakes for 5.8...whAt is the advantage?
 
  #12  
Old 12-01-2014, 04:22 PM
lisagoud's Avatar
lisagoud
lisagoud is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
which pistons do I use with GT40 head for 5.8 application (block is a stock 1987 era flat tappet--non-roller)?
 
  #13  
Old 12-01-2014, 08:15 PM
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
'89F2urd is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,043
Received 122 Likes on 103 Posts
Originally Posted by lisagoud
sp both the GT40's and the Gt40P take the factory intake manifold?
the GT40's take the regular exhaust manfold while the GT40P takes the unique exhaust manifold?
Why the big deal for the lighting intakes for 5.8...whAt is the advantage?


both heads accept the manifold of the engine theyre going on respectively. 302 fits 302 w/ gt40, 351 fits 351 w/ gt40 heads.


the 351 efi intake is a miserable display of intake design. its the lower that is the problem, its very short with sharp bends. the lightning intake is a taller piece...if youre lucky enough to find one, it'll be pricey. not really worth the cost, you can get some new aftermarket intakes for the cost of what people try to get for their 20 year old used pieces.
 
  #14  
Old 12-01-2014, 08:17 PM
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
'89F2urd is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,043
Received 122 Likes on 103 Posts
Originally Posted by lisagoud
which pistons do I use with GT40 head for 5.8 application (block is a stock 1987 era flat tappet--non-roller)?


piston selection depends on what you want. if you want it to have max power and efficiency, get some pistons to increase your compression. that's also if you don't mind running 93 octane.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Plowboy34
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
10-07-2016 12:56 PM
Mondoweld22
Performance & General Engine Building
1
09-29-2016 05:59 PM
Redneckfordf2502002
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
9
04-06-2016 11:10 AM
Jack78
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
5
08-08-2015 01:30 PM
abninf87
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
3
09-20-2009 08:36 PM



Quick Reply: 91 351w rebuild/upgrade question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.