Powerstroke vs Cummins
#1
Powerstroke vs Cummins
Okay so I noticed lately that a lot of people (at least in the dentside and bumpside forums) are putting Cummins in their trucks rather than powerstokes. Is there a reason for this? What are the pro's and con's of each?
(TROLLS: yes, I already know Ford also makes cummins, you may return to your cave, your services are not needed)
(TROLLS: yes, I already know Ford also makes cummins, you may return to your cave, your services are not needed)
#4
As said above it is because Powerstrokes are electronically controlled, and the old 12v Cummins are very simple and don't require special electronics or a computer.
The older IDI is all mechanical, but it isn't used for very many swaps because they don't make big power. They are sometimes swapped into Bronco's or F150's simply because it's so easy. I bet the IDI's would be popular if it wasn't for turbos. Since that's where the new diesels get most of their power.
The older IDI is all mechanical, but it isn't used for very many swaps because they don't make big power. They are sometimes swapped into Bronco's or F150's simply because it's so easy. I bet the IDI's would be popular if it wasn't for turbos. Since that's where the new diesels get most of their power.
#5
Ford doesn't make the Cummins. The B series Cummins is like the small block chevy of the diesel world. There is tons of them everywhere and a bunch of aftermarket go-fast parts for them. And you can bolt them to damn near any tranny you want to use. I prefer inlines over vees but that's me. I have one in a Ford but I also have a Powerstroke in one and I like them both for different reasons.
I just bought a military hummer rolling chassis and I can put anything I want to in it and I think I've settled on putting a 6.0 in it because I know what it takes to make them reliable and parts are getting cheaper for them.
By the way, the Cummins in my F350 replaced a new 5.8 liter gas burner, not a 7.3, I get asked that alot. If it had been born with a 7.3 it would probably still have it in there.
I just bought a military hummer rolling chassis and I can put anything I want to in it and I think I've settled on putting a 6.0 in it because I know what it takes to make them reliable and parts are getting cheaper for them.
By the way, the Cummins in my F350 replaced a new 5.8 liter gas burner, not a 7.3, I get asked that alot. If it had been born with a 7.3 it would probably still have it in there.
#7
Trending Topics
#9
Okay so I noticed lately that a lot of people (at least in the dentside and bumpside forums) are putting Cummins in their trucks rather than powerstokes. Is there a reason for this? What are the pro's and con's of each?
(TROLLS: yes, I already know Ford also makes cummins, you may return to your cave, your services are not needed)
(TROLLS: yes, I already know Ford also makes cummins, you may return to your cave, your services are not needed)
Making big power is cheap, and repairs are cheap.
I personally think most people like them cause they sound like a little semi motor.
#11
I didnt feel like going with a Cummins swap in my Bumpside. Just like a Chevy 350, as already mentioned, they're already too generic. I'm going with a Ford 6.6, which is still a big 6, but an extra touch of class with the 'Ford' script on the valve cover. Simple, very basic wiring, and can make tons of power. A new Holland tractor place will have all the replacement parts, and dealers quite plentiful in farm country. A powerstroke isnt simple to wire, but do make plenty of power. Plus, a 6 cyl has the room to add a second turbo.
#12
^this is correct.
and OP there are several reasons people swap out their powerstrokes for a cummins engine. The cummins is generally more reliable, especially the older ones. Also, if they plan on building a high hp engine the HEUI injection system used on the 7.3 and 6.0 cannot supply near as much fuel as a mechanically injected cummins. Another thing to consider is that parts for the older 12 valves are much cheaper than for powerstrokes.