Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

94 f250 vs 98 f250LD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-05-2010, 08:54 PM
Volkmann's Avatar
Volkmann
Volkmann is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
94 f250 vs 98 f250LD

I have a '98 F250LD (ext cab sbox) with the 5.4L, 3.73 rear end, and extra leaf springs that I use to pull a 6x16 gooseneck livestock trailer. I'm looking at buying a 94 F250 with a 351 5sp, reg cab long box, 4.10 rear end, for a hunting/farm <nobr style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 100%; color: darkgreen;" id="itxt_nobr_1_0">pickup</nobr>. My question is how would this 351 pull compared to my 5.4? The power numbers are relatively close since its a early model 5.4. I think they would pull about the same, the 351 maybe just a little better since it has 4.10 gears and the 5sp. What do you guys think?

The 94 has 111,000 and is a XL but has been taken good care of and I know the guy that has owned it. It has american racing rims with near new <nobr style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 100%; color: darkgreen;" id="itxt_nobr_2_0">tires</nobr> and chrome trim on it with little rust. It has a ball and trailer brake controller already installed. He's asking 2500 which is about right, what are your opinons on the price? TIA
 
  #2  
Old 03-06-2010, 12:07 AM
75Three90's Avatar
75Three90
75Three90 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Santa Fe Tx
Posts: 3,452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Price is great I don't like the 5.4 at all hand me a 351 or a 460 ill be happy
 
  #3  
Old 03-06-2010, 06:35 AM
NavyMIDN08's Avatar
NavyMIDN08
NavyMIDN08 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
my dad pulled a bumper hitch trailer for work for years with a '99SD with the 5.4. with a little over 320,000 its still going, though its finally losing a little bit of grunt (never been rebuilt). i gotta disagree with 75Three90, i think the 5.4triton is a better engine than the 351. it'll feel wheezy on some of the bigger hills. on the bright side, the 351 has tons of after-market parts available, and the basic cam/heads/headers/intake will really make it comparable to the 5.4 for little cost. just my .02
 
  #4  
Old 03-06-2010, 10:21 AM
Big_Al59's Avatar
Big_Al59
Big_Al59 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: west plains spokane,wa
Posts: 1,110
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Were you planning to keep the 98? Have 2 trucks? I like the OBS trucks, I don't think you'll see a noticeable diffference in power. Are they 4wd? You said you wanted it for a hunting/fishing truck.
 
  #5  
Old 03-06-2010, 10:26 AM
redthhies's Avatar
redthhies
redthhies is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have had new and old Fords. My favorite is the 29-97 F350s. I would not even think for a minute before buying the 351 powered truck. I appreciate the technology in newer trucks, but once they are out of warranty, thank you, no.
 
  #6  
Old 03-06-2010, 10:53 AM
Volkmann's Avatar
Volkmann
Volkmann is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, they are both 4x4 and im planning on keeping them both. just wanted to make sure and tell you all that my 98 f250 is not a heavy or super duty, its the light duty version. Basically just a heavy half since my rear end has a lot more leaf springs. MY 98 is a nice truck, dualed out and looks nice as its black with chrome and the goodies. I'm just tired of always having to clean it all the time before going out or going somewhere. The 98 will be my daily driver and the 94 will become the work truck/farm/ hunting truck and the 98 will be the back up
 
  #7  
Old 03-06-2010, 02:57 PM
Volkmann's Avatar
Volkmann
Volkmann is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another thing i was think was that shouldnt the 351 because to make a little bit more power on the low end compared the the 5.4? I know the 5.4 pulls good but its always downshifting to 3300-3600rpms to make it.
 
  #8  
Old 03-09-2010, 03:13 AM
75Three90's Avatar
75Three90
75Three90 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Santa Fe Tx
Posts: 3,452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
NavyMIDN08 no disrespect but maybe in your experience but I had a 2001 5.4 3\4 and it pulled for me like s*** I'd rather not have one again they are fine until you hook up to a 5 ton load. That's why I upgraded to a 460
 
  #9  
Old 03-09-2010, 10:23 AM
alxsnmr's Avatar
alxsnmr
alxsnmr is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St Louis
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since this a post about opinion, I will state mine. Both motors are great when they were made and both do really well. Both also do great when geared appropriately for the job they are given. You have already made up your mind and really a 5spd paired with 4.10 gearing will have an easier time than an auto paired with 3.73 gearing. You do have a GVWR difference of 8600 vs 7700 but in truth both will do the work asked of them. Sounds like you have your going to town truck that you can wear sunday clothes in and your dirty coat and blue jeans truck for the farm. I really dont think you need an opinion from anyone else...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
76-high-boy
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
26
12-02-2011 06:38 PM
twall_SD250
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
10
03-10-2010 06:05 PM
The Freak
Nebraska Chapter
1
02-10-2010 08:41 AM
MagicMan101
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
6
01-15-2010 07:17 PM



Quick Reply: 94 f250 vs 98 f250LD



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 PM.