Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)Diesel Topics Only
Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.
You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!
I have a 93 F350 Cab & Chassis, and a 94 F Superduty...
Both frames are 8" tall until it gets to the rear axle hump.
The F Superduty frame is thicker. Not twice as thick, but between 1/16" and 1/8" thicker.
Neither frame is flat top across the reaf axle; they both have a hump on top, and also get narrower top to bottom at the axle. The F 350 frame is 5.5" high at the axle hump, the F Superduty is 6" there.
thank you Phy! i figured this was the case.
this is just what i wanted to know.there was a debate about this on obn a while back,and i never did get the real facts.
you'll building my next truck right now.do a good job,cus in a few years im gunna coppy ya probably lol.
unless of course by then the 2011 f450 6.7l will probably be in my price range.hard to say i guess.i just hate the new styling.
♠ Log Truck: '93 F-Super Duty (F450) XLT 1st Gen Navistar 444ci IDI Diesel w/ Intercooled 2nd Gen Banks Sidewinder Turbo, E40D, 5:13, Dually, 16' Dump ♠
♠ Chip Truck: '93 F250HD XLT 4x4 1st Gen Navistar 444ci IDI Diesel w/ Intercooled 2nd Gen Banks Sidewinder Turbo, E40D, 3.55, Dually, 9' Dump, & Plow ♠
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.