Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Super Duty/Heavy Duty > Super Duty And Heavy Duty
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Super Duty And Heavy Duty 1999 to current Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines SPONSORED BY:






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2009, 11:52 AM
Barndon Barndon is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 25
Barndon is starting off with a positive reputation.
exhaust for Edge juice w/attitude

hey yall, i'm fix'n to buy the Edge juice w/attitude for my 2001 F350 Lariat. however i'm completely stomped on what to do with my exhaust. i want to make sure my truck is breathing properly to keep my EGT's down, while also wanting to maintain as much backpressure as possible. everyone i've spoke to recomends just straight piping it, as it's cheap and effective. however i'm not sold on the idea of loosing that much back pressure. is there another solution i could look at. maybe a whole new exhaust system? what would you recomend, and what do they run? thanks for you help.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2009, 11:59 AM
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025 tex25025 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,709
tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barndon View Post
while also wanting to maintain as much backpressure as possible.

Why? You don't need to worry about that. I think there are people that have come up with a wrongful conclusion between too little backpressure and issues coming up.

I drove 800 miles one day with about as little backpressure as you can get when my bigger turbo "blew off" the downpipe to where it was seperated from the turbo about a couple of inches. So it was turbo then nothing. No issues what so ever after doing interstate speeds for about 800 miles. Once I got back, I had to have someone under the truck pushing up on the exhaust while I clamped it back on, but I would say that would be zero backpressure and as of now to ill effects that I'm aware of.
__________________
'06 6.0L Turbo Diesel King Ranch DRW 4.30 Gears
Spartan Stage 1 Towing Injectors
Spartan 64mm Non-VGT Turbo
Fluidampner
Headstuds
Beta Spartan Phalanx
Fuel Regulated Return
FASS 150/180
Suncoast Heavy Duty Torqshift Rebuild
5" Straight-Piped MBRP Exhaust
Tranny, EGT, Boost, and Fuel PSI C2 Gauges
Water Temp, Oil PSI, Volts Antique Beige Gauges
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2009, 04:45 PM
danyzf95 danyzf95 is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rochester
Posts: 64
danyzf95 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Less back pressure is better. It will help the turbo to spool quicker and to expel the exhaust gas faster.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2009, 05:53 PM
Barndon Barndon is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 25
Barndon is starting off with a positive reputation.
sorry if i may sound nieve, i'm a little new at this. but doesn't back pressure effect your low end and torque ? i previously had an 03 f250 6.0 and i would disconnect the cat and muffler cause it sounded good, but i noticed the truck felt some what "sluggish"? just wouldn't get up and go as usual ? so would you recomend just straight piping it ? or what would you recomend doin ?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2009, 06:47 PM
smlford's Avatar
smlford smlford is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SML / Hatteras
Posts: 347
smlford is starting off with a positive reputation.
I think the conventional wisdom (from what I've read on here) is that the turbo provides all the backpressure necessary
__________________
Eddie
2006 F-350 Larriat FX-4 CC PSD - OEM 20"wheels, Michelin LTX A/S, Spray in Bed Liner, Pace-Edwards Toneau, Fumoto valve, Coolant Bypass filter, Hidden Hitch
2007 Ranger XL 2.3 -2WD, Auto, Short Bed, The Beast !

Build Green ! www.PDandM.com
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2009, 06:57 PM
QwkTrip QwkTrip is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 736
QwkTrip is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Post turbo, the only point of the exhaust system is to expel exhaust gases away from the cab. The more free the exhaust restriction the quicker the turbo will spool and the better the truck will run.

A balanced exhaust system design is more important on a naturally aspirated engine.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2009, 08:45 PM
imprezdcrew imprezdcrew is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 55
imprezdcrew is starting off with a positive reputation.
"I've heard the following..."

the same tuner with a 4" turbo back exhaust with out a cat and only a straight through muffler runs great... as soon as you touch the throttle you can feel how much more responsive the truck is... it really brings it to life.

As far as your back pressure question... throw your theory out the window... sorry to say but when it comes to a turbo vehicle... back pressure is your enemy.

i would guess the reason your 6.0L felt that way when you disconnected part of the exhaust is because the ecu was not fueling the engine properly for the added flow and faster spool up of the turbo.

just my .02
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2009, 10:50 PM
Greg B Greg B is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 719
Greg B is starting off with a positive reputation.
4 inch turbo back will do well. You'll lose a couple of hundred degrees of EGT and gain responsiveness. The more back pressure you have with a turbo diesel the higher the EGT. Excessive EGT is the quickest way I know to kill a diesel and turbo.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2009, 11:19 PM
QwkTrip QwkTrip is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 736
QwkTrip is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
A 4" turbo back is plenty big. I wouldn't spend more on a larger exhaust unless you just want it for looks.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 03:40 AM
imprezdcrew imprezdcrew is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 55
imprezdcrew is starting off with a positive reputation.
freeway driving with out a major load i would see about 550-600 egt when i came to a stop light at the end of an off ramp... now... its more like 450 475 and quickly drops to 400 425 wich is great!

cant say enough good things about the 4"
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 07:42 AM
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad Diesel_Brad is offline
Posting Guru
1980 Ford F-350
My Garage
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gilbert, PA
Posts: 2,304
Diesel_Brad is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barndon View Post
hey yall, i'm fix'n to buy the Edge juice w/attitude for my 2001 F350 Lariat. however i'm completely stomped on what to do with my exhaust. i want to make sure my truck is breathing properly to keep my EGT's down, while also wanting to maintain as much backpressure as possible. everyone i've spoke to recomends just straight piping it, as it's cheap and effective. however i'm not sold on the idea of loosing that much back pressure. is there another solution i could look at. maybe a whole new exhaust system? what would you recomend, and what do they run? thanks for you help.
Do your self a favor and dont get the edge! Get a custom burned chip from Swamps diesel , Beans diesel, Jody Tipton, or Matt at Gearhead performance.
Power levels will be higher and it is a safer way to get the power.
As for the exhaust, less back pressure is better when it comes to a diesel. You cannot compare a POS 6.0 to a 7.3 . The 7.3 is a low end grunt engine. The 6.0 is a high RPM race engine.

I would do a turbo back exhaust from anyone OTHER than AFE or BullyDog
__________________
myspace.com/diesel_brad

96 F350 460 5pd 4x4 crewcab
94 F150 Lightning
86 F250 6.9 4spd 4x4
80 F350 429 C6 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 08:02 AM
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025 tex25025 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,709
tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Brad View Post
As for the exhaust, less back pressure is better when it comes to a diesel. You cannot compare a POS 6.0 to a 7.3 .
In some instances that is true, you cannot compare the two, in terms of exhaust though you can, because that's were it's actually the same as far as requirements go.

As to the POS 6.0 comment, I had a 7.3, it's lacking when it comes to what a 6.0 can do. However, that is going to be a highly individualized assessment due to needs of one driver over the other.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Brad View Post
The 7.3 is a low end grunt engine. The 6.0 is a high RPM race engine.
It's higher rpm then a 7.3, that's for sure, but it is nowhere near a high rpm race engine. You're talking about another 350-400 rpms on top of what you see for peak hp/tq on the 6.0 even with tunes. Now for those with bigger turbos and injectors it's probably another 350 on top of what the 6.0 does with those depending on the size.

I know I'm getting off topic, but I felt the need to clarify a few comments that were made.
__________________
'06 6.0L Turbo Diesel King Ranch DRW 4.30 Gears
Spartan Stage 1 Towing Injectors
Spartan 64mm Non-VGT Turbo
Fluidampner
Headstuds
Beta Spartan Phalanx
Fuel Regulated Return
FASS 150/180
Suncoast Heavy Duty Torqshift Rebuild
5" Straight-Piped MBRP Exhaust
Tranny, EGT, Boost, and Fuel PSI C2 Gauges
Water Temp, Oil PSI, Volts Antique Beige Gauges
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 11:46 AM
QwkTrip QwkTrip is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 736
QwkTrip is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I agree. I wouldn't call the 6.0L a high RPM race engine. It's just an ordinary medium duty V8 diesel.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 01:35 PM
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad Diesel_Brad is offline
Posting Guru
1980 Ford F-350
My Garage
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gilbert, PA
Posts: 2,304
Diesel_Brad is starting off with a positive reputation.
In comparison the 6.0 is a race engine by design compared to the 7.3

O and to the OP, your 01 most likely has PMRs which like to window blocks w/ improper tuning
__________________
myspace.com/diesel_brad

96 F350 460 5pd 4x4 crewcab
94 F150 Lightning
86 F250 6.9 4spd 4x4
80 F350 429 C6 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 02:29 PM
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025 tex25025 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,709
tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Brad View Post
In comparison the 6.0 is a race engine by design compared to the 7.3

Well, you could say the same thing about a 7.3 as a race engine compared to the old 6.9 then. We could follow that line of reasoning on down the line comparing old engines to new engines.
__________________
'06 6.0L Turbo Diesel King Ranch DRW 4.30 Gears
Spartan Stage 1 Towing Injectors
Spartan 64mm Non-VGT Turbo
Fluidampner
Headstuds
Beta Spartan Phalanx
Fuel Regulated Return
FASS 150/180
Suncoast Heavy Duty Torqshift Rebuild
5" Straight-Piped MBRP Exhaust
Tranny, EGT, Boost, and Fuel PSI C2 Gauges
Water Temp, Oil PSI, Volts Antique Beige Gauges
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.