Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > General Automotive Discussion
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 01:35 PM
jim henderson jim henderson is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 4,624
jim henderson has a very good reputation on FTE. jim henderson has a very good reputation on FTE. jim henderson has a very good reputation on FTE.
Volvo being sold to Geely Motoros China

Another icon of automotivedom has been sold to the lowest bidder, uh I mean cheesyest manufacturer. See...

Ford Favors China's Geely As Volvo Buyer

I am not much of a fan of Volvos but always felt they were pretty safe cars, and up to now they were "Fords".

Now They are almost sold to Geely in China. I wonder if Volvo's reputation for being a safe solid car will survive? The crash tests of other Chinese vehicles and the continuing plague of below par Chinese made products make me doubt it. With their penchant for cutting corners of every kind I wonder how long Volvos will even have seat belts.

Another sad day coming I think.

Jim Henderson
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 06:41 PM
Ford_Six's Avatar
Ford_Six Ford_Six is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Rexburg, ID
Posts: 11,521
Ford_Six has much to be proud of Ford_Six has much to be proud of Ford_Six has much to be proud of Ford_Six has much to be proud of Ford_Six has much to be proud of Ford_Six has much to be proud of Ford_Six has much to be proud of Ford_Six has much to be proud of Ford_Six has much to be proud of Ford_Six has much to be proud of
Sad indeed. Ford should have absorbed Volvo into Mercury and Lincoln to give them the luxury and performance they used to have. You do have to admit that Volvo is a long ways from the "bricks" of the 80s. I liked those cars.
__________________
Jared
The government said all my vehicle were too old to be clunkers

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2009, 11:09 AM
horsepuller's Avatar
horsepuller horsepuller is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,915
horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation
Ford picked up Volvo somewhere around 1999. We've owned several of the "Volvo" Volvo's in the past. We kept them a long time and they were well deserving of their reputation for safety and reliability. The first "Ford" Volvo we bought was in 2003. It was a disappointment compared to the real Volvo's. Built on a Ford platform, it lacked the comfort and cavernous interior space Volvo built it's reputation with. It was totaled in an intersection accident soon after. Our son who was driving was unhurt. So thankfully it did maintain it's safety reputation. With our insurance money in hand, we did not even think about going back to the Volvo dealer.

IMO, Ford did not ad any value to Volvo. They just sucked it dry. Same as Diamler did to Chrystler.
__________________
Scott
Forum Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2009, 02:05 PM
jimandmandy jimandmandy is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 4,343
jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE. jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE. jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE.
The problem I see here is intellectual property. Volvo has evolved onto Ford/Mazda platforms with styling and I think engines from Sweden. How are they going to sell Volvo without selling the platform rights and engineering data?

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2009, 05:11 PM
horsepuller's Avatar
horsepuller horsepuller is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,915
horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimandmandy View Post
The problem I see here is intellectual property. Volvo has evolved onto Ford/Mazda platforms with styling and I think engines from Sweden. How are they going to sell Volvo without selling the platform rights and engineering data?

Jim
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manufacturing.net
If the sale goes through, it would be another step in the U.S. auto industry's retrenchment from global operations, and another investment in them by a Chinese company.
Jim, if this is correct, it sounds like Ford will retain some interest which would, I think, get around the intellectual property issue. So it may be that Ford is outsourcing Volvo production to China and at the same time selling the Chinese a large stake of Volvo. This is probably a win/win. It gives the Chinese a modern automotive production line while giving Ford much needed cash to pay down debt and concentrate on their core business of domestic vehicles.
__________________
Scott
Forum Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2009, 09:45 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Va
Posts: 2,780
tseekins has a great reputation on FTE. tseekins has a great reputation on FTE. tseekins has a great reputation on FTE. tseekins has a great reputation on FTE.
I also wonder if Volvo's heavy equipment line-up is part of that deal as well.

I hate the thought of anything being sold or outsourced to China. At least they didn't go bankrupt and beg the government for $$$ like the other two detroit losers did.

The world market broadens yet again.


Tim
__________________
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
'04 Expedition XLT 4x2
'99 Taurus Wagon SE 24V
'88 F-150 4x4 XLT Lariat 5.8L 5Spd
Rights of Passage: CPO Initiation, Submarine Qualified (SS), Golden Shellback, Blue Nose, Order of the Ditch
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2009, 12:45 PM
jimandmandy jimandmandy is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 4,343
jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE. jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE. jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE.
Volvo AB was not sold to Ford and therefore is not being sold to China. Same name, different companies. Volvo AB also owns Nissan Diesel, Renault Trucks, Penta marine, Volvo Aero engines, and yes construction equipment. It also interesting that Renault/Nissan has sold its heavy truck and diesel engine divisions to Volvo.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2009, 06:11 PM
horsepuller's Avatar
horsepuller horsepuller is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,915
horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation horsepuller has a superb reputation
I see a lot of new Volvo trucks on the road. It used to be White/Volvo. Now just Volvo. I don't think there is a White truck company anymore. Not too terribly long back, White used to own the Freightliner moniker. Now it is not.
__________________
Scott
Forum Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2009, 12:51 AM
rebocardo rebocardo is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 12,711
rebocardo is a splendid one to behold rebocardo is a splendid one to behold rebocardo is a splendid one to behold rebocardo is a splendid one to behold rebocardo is a splendid one to behold rebocardo is a splendid one to behold rebocardo is a splendid one to behold rebocardo is a splendid one to behold
Ford has certainly puked up almost all it ate.
__________________
The Year 2009 Anno Domini -
May it bring a great year of Revelations to you.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2009, 10:38 AM
stockcar nut's Avatar
stockcar nut stockcar nut is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OKC, Ok
Posts: 181
stockcar nut is starting off with a positive reputation.
Scott, my dad's first Volvo truck's fender emblem read "White-GMC-Volvo". And for what it's worth, Freightliner never belonged to White Motor Company. It was designed, manufactured and owned by Consolidated Freightways who had a twenty five or so year contract with White, who provided the dealership network for the Freightliner. Hince the nameplate "White-Freightliner" untill the early seventies. Tom
__________________
Last week I couldn't even spell mukanick and now I are one !!!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2009, 05:10 PM
monckywrench monckywrench is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,377
monckywrench has a good reputation on FTE. monckywrench has a good reputation on FTE.
" Ford has certainly puked up almost all it ate."

Quite right, proving Ford should have stuck to its core business instead of playing about with different and lesser companies.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2009, 05:47 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Va
Posts: 2,780
tseekins has a great reputation on FTE. tseekins has a great reputation on FTE. tseekins has a great reputation on FTE. tseekins has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by monckywrench View Post
" Ford has certainly puked up almost all it ate."

Quite right, proving Ford should have stuck to its core business instead of playing about with different and lesser companies.
Not sure if I would consider Volvo to be a lesser company. Smaller in sales volume perhaps. I believe that Ford's ownership of Volvo was instrumental in Ford's new found quality and safety improvements.

Did Volvo suffer from Ford's ownership? Most likely, yes. I'm not up on current quality trends for Volvo but I'd bet that Volvo was a higher quality car before Ford bought them.

Tim
__________________
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
'04 Expedition XLT 4x2
'99 Taurus Wagon SE 24V
'88 F-150 4x4 XLT Lariat 5.8L 5Spd
Rights of Passage: CPO Initiation, Submarine Qualified (SS), Golden Shellback, Blue Nose, Order of the Ditch
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 12:11 PM
jimandmandy jimandmandy is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 4,343
jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE. jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE. jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE.
Volvo cars, SAAB, Audi, BMW and maybe others had to respond to shifts in the market just as Chrysler, Mercury, Pontiac, Oldsmobile and Buick (not very well) over here. The mid-price segment is dead.

BMW and Audi successfully went upmarket into Luxury territory. Volvo and SAAB were too small and sold out to Ford and GM. SAAB brand identity under GM was a disaster, with an odd mix of rebadged GM and Subaru (the "Saabaru") vehicles. Ford tried this Premium Automotive Group thing with Austin Martin, Land Rover, Jaguar, Volvo and Lincoln. It just didnt work. While I did like the Lincoln LS and S type Jaguar, different cars sharing the same platform, the Mondeo-based X type pulled Jag down-market.

Meanwhile, Volvo really didnt fit in with its British partners. All cars today are relatively safe and low-emissions, so Volvo lost its appeal to young families and college professors. Stuck in the muddled middle, Ford just shared platforms between Volvo and low-priced Ford and Mazda.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2009, 12:04 AM
Chaosracing Chaosracing is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 869
Chaosracing is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by horsepuller View Post
I see a lot of new Volvo trucks on the road. It used to be White/Volvo. Now just Volvo. I don't think there is a White truck company anymore. Not too terribly long back, White used to own the Freightliner moniker. Now it is not.

Volvo owns Mack trucks. White I believe is no more, but they were also making the big GM trucks as well back in the 80's (Brigadeer for one)

Volvo cars were basically turned into Ford cars. Ford wanted some of the safety tech that Volvo had when they bought them. I think it is a mistake to sell off the Volvo brand, but also when someone is willing to buy the company (and not have to beg to buy it like GM has been doing) I think it is smart to dump it now and help out the 3 core lines for Ford.
__________________
2002 Ford F250 4x4 V10<-FORD's best kept secret.
1947 Ford 1 Ton
2001 Sport Trac (Wife's vehicle)
Powered by Ford, Fueled by Madness
Support America and capitalism....BUY A FORD!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2009, 12:56 AM
less less is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,026
less is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I had a 'real' Volvo...a '62 PV544s with the twin SU carb B18s engine.

Looked like a '40's Ford Tudor, although it first came into production in 1944..(444).went through till '65.

They were rugged cars, tough, handled well, that powerful 4 cylinder would blow the doors off a lot of cars. The 4 speed was a Borg Warner and the rear axle a Spicer...think these parts were also installed in Studebaker V8's...so with a 4 cylinder, even a high perf. job., they were bullet proof.

The PV544s was very competitve against sports cars of the day in rallies and road races...it was possibly the first sports sedan.

I surprised a few full size cars with small V8's and slushboxes in stoplight GP's and on a twisty road...the old PV would just walk away from them. The body rolled a lot, but the tires never gave up their tenacious grip.

Best shifting car I ever had or drove, clutch had a beautiful feel to it and those brakes , although drums didn't seem to fade.

My '62 had the first shoulder harness belts I ever used...it was a safe car, fast, handled well.

Wish I had a fully restored Volvo PV544s.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2009 , china , folvo , ford , geely , news , outsourcing , sold , trucks , volvo

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.