Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic and Antique Trucks > 1980 - 1986 F100, F150 And Larger F-Series Trucks
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

1980 - 1986 F100, F150 And Larger F-Series Trucks SPONSORED BY:






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 01:44 PM
first today's Avatar
first today first today is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: river ridge, La
Posts: 846
first today has a good reputation on FTE. first today has a good reputation on FTE. first today has a good reputation on FTE.
302, 351 questions

My dad is unhappy with his mileage on his 83 flareside , 302 , 500cfm 2barrel , automatic, non overdrive , 2 wheel drive.

He went from 3:50 positive trac gears to 2:75 limited slip.
Either way he is only getting 13 MPG.
Would there be an advantage to doing away with the v-belts and going with factory serpentine pulleys or aftermarket serpentine underdrive pulleys?

He is thinking about putting a low mileage 1979 mustang 5.0 in the truck. Do you think it would be worth the time?

We also have a couple of 351 windsor options.
One is a 1995 351 windsor roller motor in a F-350. The other is a 351 windsor in a 1972 F-100. I have read that you can actually get better mileage with the windsor engine over the 302.
If we use the 95 roller motor we would like to keep it carbed. I read that this is okay, is it? I also realize that Fuel injection is better mpg but would like to keep the swap as computer free as possible.

Again would it be better to use the v-belt set up or the serpentine if he goes the 351 route?

Should we just change the transmission on the 302 to an auto OD from a 89 lincoln town car. I have also read that the OD does not fair well against a 351 windsor.


I realize this is a lot of questions and I have read so many threads on these subjects, it is overwhelming. I think this may be a clearer explanation. Any help will be appreciated.
I mentioned these vehicles specifically because we have these autos to choose from along with a few others in our field. They are good complete low mileage parts cars for us. (gotta love having your own private junkyard on a big piece of property)
__________________
Call me Kyle

_____________________________





Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2009, 05:24 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is online now
Post Fiend
1990 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 9,732
Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE.
Are the tires stock size? What kind of driving does the truck see? Has the speedo been checked against a GPS for accuracy? How is this milage being calculated? FYI.. it should be miles driven according to odometer divided by gallons to refill tank, hence the need for an accurate speedo/odo. Fuel gauge cannot be used and the tank does not need to be emptied every time.

That is a pretty light truck so it should do a lot better. The 302 would benefit from a cam upgrade and some longtube headers, the '79 mustang motor is probably less powerful with worse heads so it's no upgrade IMO. A 5.8 can get better highway milage but it'll do worse in town, and the AOD from the towncar will survive behind a 351 no problem if it's healthy and gets a shift kit, my AOD is still kicking.. 10 years later.

Belt system is your choice, the serpentine system is simple and has a spring loaded tensioner in many cases, the belts will last a looooong time assuming all the pulleys line up correctly. The V belt system is fine too just has more parts and belts.
__________________
Paul O

1990 F150 4x4 XLT X-Cab 5.0, 3.55LS, Comp XE264HR-14, Flowtech LT's to 3" single, FRPP Mass Air Conversion, TweecerRT with BE, Innovate LC-1 wideband O2
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2009, 08:45 PM
first today's Avatar
first today first today is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: river ridge, La
Posts: 846
first today has a good reputation on FTE. first today has a good reputation on FTE. first today has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conanski View Post
Are the tires stock size?
Yes, they are stock size.

What kind of driving does the truck see?
Regular highway with light city driving.

Has the speedo been checked against a GPS for accuracy?
Yes it has. It was dead on with the 3:50 and is off 1 1/2 miles in a 10 mile drive with the 2:75.

How is this milage being calculated? FYI.. it should be miles driven according to odometer divided by gallons to refill tank, hence the need for an accurate speedo/odo. Fuel gauge cannot be used and the tank does not need to be emptied every time.
As stated here.

That is a pretty light truck so it should do a lot better. The 302 would benefit from a cam upgrade and some longtube headers, the '79 mustang motor is probably less powerful with worse heads so it's no upgrade IMO. A 5.8 can get better highway milage but it'll do worse in town, and the AOD from the towncar will survive behind a 351 no problem if it's healthy and gets a shift kit, my AOD is still kicking.. 10 years later.
So if he stays with the 302 would he benefit from the GT40 heads? What cam upgrade would be good? It does not have headers, but does have true duals with 1 1/2 inch exhaust.
The other route would be the 351 with the AOD and shift kit. We would also need the Lokar AOD cable kit, would we need a cam upgrade on the 351 or would stock be okay?

Belt system is your choice, the serpentine system is simple and has a spring loaded tensioner in many cases, the belts will last a looooong time assuming all the pulleys line up correctly. The V belt system is fine too just has more parts and belts.
He is not looking for a hot rod, just a good reliable daily driver. The motor also has the chevy style distributor in it . This was how the truck was bought. He has no problems with the changes you recommend. Thank you very much for all the info. This is what he is working with.



__________________
Call me Kyle

_____________________________





Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2009, 09:51 PM
bashby's Avatar
bashby bashby is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Charles Town, W bygod Va
Posts: 1,014
bashby is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
If he isnt worried about power I'd just go with the 302. There will be more little things to do/buy when swapping engine sizes. Whats wrong with the old engine? You might go throught all the trouble and $ of the motor change and get the ssame MPG as your old engine
__________________
86 F350 2WD Duallie dump. 351W edelbrock cam, carb, d/p intake,C6, D0OE heads. 4.10 gears
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 03:47 PM
oddshot oddshot is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NoGa.
Posts: 217
oddshot is starting off with a positive reputation.
I've been giving this some thought now that I got my 82 together and running.

I got a 302 RUG 4spd, 4x4. 2 Bbl Motorcraft. No A/C, no air pump or cat, flex fan on the front.

The best MPG I've EVER gotten was 15 MPG on runs from Georgia to New Jersey ... I was feather footin' the throttle ... keeping it to about 65 MPH. But I could get that almost every trip.

Now that gas is going up (AGAIN!!!) I'm thinking of things I can do to get a little more MPG's.

Maybe a windage tray to reduce parasitic losses in the low end. A better air cleaner set up might help.

Maybe build up a set of heads ... match the intakes and exhausts ... new set of valves ... light polish.


I don't know if a cam, an intake manifold and a Holly 4 bbl will give me a boost in MPG that would be worth the investment in money.

I really do not want to get involved in F.I. on this truck. Its built to be simple ... reliable ... easy to work on in a difficult environment.

What else can you do to a 302, without ripping it apart, that will give you an improvement in MPGs?
__________________
oddshot
82 Ford F100 302, 4X4, 4Spd
72 MGB-GT 1.8 4 Cyl, Nissan 5 spd, TBI.
72 MGB Roadster 2.8 GM V6
99 Blazer Grocery Getter
99 Mercedes Benz 500 SL Roadster (the wife's car)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 04:00 PM
DLP Performance DLP Performance is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 161
DLP Performance is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'd just put in the AOD & ride on.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 07:42 PM
xirxious xirxious is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 43
xirxious is starting off with a positive reputation.
Check it against other same set up trucks. A friend had a 6 cyl that was geared a lot lower to make up for some power and it cost his mileage. I'd check the basic tune up items. Is the carb working up to snuff? Is the Catalytic plugged? PCV or EGR valve? Inflating your tires to the max recommended limit helps. If it were me, I'd either go with a new carb or an overdriven trans before swapping a good motor. Adding the roller cam & rockers from a mustang would help.

THere is a vid on youtube about a guy who was able to up the mileage with a few simple tricks, but that was with a newer fuelie car that he shut off when at a stop for more than 10 sec.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 08:37 PM
86bigred's Avatar
86bigred 86bigred is offline
part time
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: patricia ab canada
Posts: 942
86bigred is starting off with a positive reputation.
an overdrive trans will help.my 81 302 3.00 rear with the 4 speed od i get real close to 18 mpgand i drive it like i stole it.this was done with a gps,cause speedo does not work.if i leave it in 3rd which is 1 to 1 i'm lucky if i get 15 mpg
__________________
81 f150 302 4 sp od daily driver
86 f250 460 t19 4x4
85 f150 300 t18 4x4
89 ford tempo
83 ranger 2.3 4sp
http://s469.photobucket.com/albums/rr57/86bigred/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1972 , 302 , 351 , belt , belts , computer , conversion , f150 , factory , ford , free , serpentine , set , truck , trucks , windsor

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.