Roller Cam Vs. Flat Tappet In 302 - Page 3 - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

Roller Cam Vs. Flat Tappet In 302

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #31  
Old 03-31-2014, 06:58 PM
akdanstar's Avatar
akdanstar akdanstar is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 193
akdanstar is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conanski View Post
For some reason my photo isn't showing up, it's a pic of a factory spider and dogbones in a late model roller block. Here's a link

IMG_0524 on Flickr - Photo Sharing!

Thank you for the photos Paul, they are a very big help.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-31-2014, 10:03 PM
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special Nothing Special is online now
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Roseville, MN
Posts: 3,199
Nothing Special has a great reputation on FTE.Nothing Special has a great reputation on FTE.Nothing Special has a great reputation on FTE.Nothing Special has a great reputation on FTE.Nothing Special has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LARIAT 85 View Post
Yes, the roller blocks started in 1985. Even though the F150 came with a roller block, they still used flat tappet cams well into the 1990s. The Ford Mustang, however, got the roller block and a roller cam for the 1985 model year. 1985 was the last year for a carbureted Mustang, and 1985 was the ONLY year that the Mustang offered both the 4V carb AND roller cam.

As for when Ford started calling the 302 a 5.0, that came much earlier. I do know that in 1982, the Ford Mustang GT still used a flat tappet cam and 2V carb, and the car came with the famous "5.0" emblems on the side. I think the "5.0" and "EFI" moniker was placed on the F150 intake starting with the 1987 redesign, however.

For some reason though, I noticed that most people tend to call the Mustang motor the "5.0", and the truck motor the "302," regardless of the year, even though they are basically the same.
A friend of mine had a '79 Capri (same as a Mustang) that said "5.0" on the fender, so the name goes at least that far back

As far as I'm concerned, all engines have names, not a displacement that can be converted between units however you want. Ford put a 5.0 in Mustangs and a 302 in everything else, I don't care if they're the same engine
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 08-27-2016, 11:57 PM
Charlesmax90 Charlesmax90 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 22
Charlesmax90 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Roller or flat tappet

Ive seen several different comments on when and what years and model vehicles the 302v8 acquired a roller cam. So what is it? in this thread alone ive seen 3 different years 85, 87, & 89. I have an 84 bronco 302 2bbl and reading this thread has brought alot to my attention. Im now questioning what i can even do with my motor. And how long its ran with out the Vddp zinc additive as im almost certain it has a flat tappet cam ##ck me!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 08-28-2016, 09:07 AM
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2 Franklin2 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New Market, VA
Posts: 37,333
Franklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant future
Welcome to having a Ford. Ford always slowly phased in changes it seems, sometimes mid-year. So you can have the same year vehicle and be equipped differently.

I have had many many conventional tappet engines and have had no problems with cam wear with the newer oils. I am sure the zinc helps, but so far it seems to be over blown just like the leaded/unleaded fuel was over blown.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 08-28-2016, 08:56 PM
Festus Hagen's Avatar
Festus Hagen Festus Hagen is offline
Methanoholic
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maine (NorCal Native)
Posts: 6,443
Festus Hagen has a great reputation on FTE.Festus Hagen has a great reputation on FTE.Festus Hagen has a great reputation on FTE.Festus Hagen has a great reputation on FTE.Festus Hagen has a great reputation on FTE.
It is most important during break in, after that it's not that big of a deal ...

-Enjoy
fh : )_~
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
351w cam selection crash113 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 8 10-09-2016 12:13 PM
Is it worth it to build a block with a flat tappet cam? Unaffiliated Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 8 01-22-2016 06:52 PM
Ordered camshaft too early! HELP! f-150_1993 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 63 12-23-2013 02:27 PM
Crankshaft 77 2wd 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 9 09-23-2012 01:57 PM
All about Cams-- F-250 restorer Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300 0 10-05-2010 08:24 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Tags
302, 400, cam, camshaft, conversion, converting, flat, ford, gas, hp, mileage, motor, roller, sb, tappet

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 PM.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.