Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150 SVT Ford F150 Lightning, Roush, Saleen and other performance F150's SPONSORED BY:






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2009, 01:24 PM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill 6CylBill is online now
Postmaster
1994 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Guarding the Gates
Posts: 4,050
6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE. 6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE.
Your pumpkin didn't have a metal tag on it?

I ran outside and looked at my own axle code. It says 18. I would assume that means you have the OTHER gear ratio, being 3.55. I wouldn't bet my life on this. I also couldn't tell you if you have limited slip or not. The metal tag on your pumpkin would tell you if you have limited slip.
__________________
GodBlessAmerica!!
GodBlessFTEUsers!
'94 F-150 FlareSide 4.9L 4.11 w/ Locker 3'' lift and custom exhaust. 217,000 miles and counting!
"She might be slow but she gets the job done.."
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2009, 11:33 PM
96 ford f150 96 ford f150 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
96 ford f150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
well i know i dont have posi cuz 1 tire spins and the other dont o and i have a 3:31 rear end





19 — 3.55 non-limited slip (Econoline, F-150)
18 — 3.08 non-limited slip (F-150)
17 — 3.31 non-limited slip (Econoline)
H9 — 3.55 limited slip (F-150, F-250)
B6 — 3.73 limited slip (F-150, F-250)
24 — 3.73 (Econoline)
32 — 4.10 (Econoline)
35 — 4.09 (Econoline)
34 — 3.73 (Econoline)
39 — 3.55 (Econoline)
52 — 4.10 (Econoline)
56 — 4.10 (Econoline)
81 — 4.63 (Econoline)
27 — 3.31 non-limited slip (F-250)
26 — 3.73 non-limited slip (F-250)
41 — 3.27 non-limited slip (Explorer/Mountaineer)
45 — 3.55 non-limited slip (Explorer/Mountaineer)
46 — 3.73 non-limited slip (Explorer/Mountaineer)
42 — 4.10 non-limited slip (Explorer/Mountaineer)
D1 — 3.27 limited slip (Explorer/Mountaineer)
D4 — 3.73 limited slip (Explorer/Mountaineer)
D2 — 4.10 limited slip (Explorer/Mountaineer)
84 — 3.45 non-limited slip (Ranger)
86 — 3.73 non-limited slip (Ranger)
87 — 4.10 non-limited slip (Ranger)
89 — 4.56 non-limited slip (Ranger)
F6 — 3.73 limited slip (Ranger)
F7 — 4.10 limited slip (Ranger)
92 — 3.08 non-limited slip (Ranger)
R5 — 3.55 limited slip (Ranger)
91 — 3.27 non-limited slip (Ranger)
96 — 3.73 non-limited slip (Ranger)
R6 — 3.73 limited slip (Ranger)"
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 10:25 AM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill 6CylBill is online now
Postmaster
1994 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Guarding the Gates
Posts: 4,050
6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE. 6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE.
Dude, thanks for the CHART! I'm saving this.

Edit; The Escape's axle code reads 96. Would this be the same as the Rangers? If so, the gear ratio is 3.73 non-limited slip, which is what I think it is (well I thought it was 4.10 but I wasn't sure).
__________________
GodBlessAmerica!!
GodBlessFTEUsers!
'94 F-150 FlareSide 4.9L 4.11 w/ Locker 3'' lift and custom exhaust. 217,000 miles and counting!
"She might be slow but she gets the job done.."
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 11:03 AM
96 ford f150 96 ford f150 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
96 ford f150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
yea i bleave that would be true i think i just found this chart
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 02:24 PM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill 6CylBill is online now
Postmaster
1994 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Guarding the Gates
Posts: 4,050
6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE. 6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE.
Cool man. Where did you find this chart anyway? Just curious. I guess the Ranger and Escape would share the same axle codes but I'm not sure. I mean it sounds close enough, the Escape is going to have a 3.73 or 4.10 gear anyway, the little 3.0L just doesn't push out much torque.
__________________
GodBlessAmerica!!
GodBlessFTEUsers!
'94 F-150 FlareSide 4.9L 4.11 w/ Locker 3'' lift and custom exhaust. 217,000 miles and counting!
"She might be slow but she gets the job done.."
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2009, 12:28 AM
96 ford f150 96 ford f150 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
96 ford f150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
i was just browseing and i found it
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2009, 10:58 PM
92f150I6's Avatar
92f150I6 92f150I6 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,241
92f150I6 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 93F22A6 View Post
I'm just curious as to why the T-5 is no good. What other 5 speed options (stock wise not looking to spend a lot of money)? (I have a 76 F-100)
The T5 is a good trans, but it more probably wont hold up very long in a truck behind a 351. The trans barley handles the output of a 5.0 mustang.
__________________
2003 F250 SD 4X4 5.4L 4:10 Arizona Beige
1987 Mustang GT
09 Challenger RT
A bunch of motorcycles, other cars, and a Quad.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2009, 10:15 PM
ceetwarrior's Avatar
ceetwarrior ceetwarrior is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,618
ceetwarrior is starting off with a positive reputation.
5-speed Lightning, SWEEET! That NLOC thread was a killer writeup!

I think a T56 is out beacause the shifter location is right on the far end of the tailshaft and would poke through where the center seat or console is. I ran into that when wanting to swap a 5-speed into my f100. Had to keep the bench seat so that limited on car trans swaps, so I went with a NV truck trans and stock location.

The M50D would be the easiest to swap in, but that trans is crap. Even my 300-6 has torn that trans up!

If you get a Cobra spec T-5Z it will hold up a lot longer than a regular T-5 but who knows about in a truck. My stock T-5Z in my '93 Cobra has 438rwhp 495rwtq Kenne Bell supercharged power, and it holds up nicely if not powershifted.

I think that TKO 600 is the best idea and someone before you has already done it, so use his writeup as instructions.
__________________
-There's no replacement for Displacement
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2009, 12:18 PM
mike460's Avatar
mike460 mike460 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: atl
Posts: 453
mike460 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ceetwarrior View Post
The M50D would be the easiest to swap in, but that trans is crap. Even my 300-6 has torn that trans up!
I bet your 300 tore it up because all the fluid leaked out - totally notorious for that. I have a M5OD behind the Windsor in my 88, got the shift plug kit from Southern Gear (eliminates leaking issues), a Spec Stage 3 clutch, and Redline fluid in it and it does fine.

The truck made 306 hp and 360 lb-ft at the tires with the little baby cam, now it should make about 340/370 with the new one.
__________________
88 F150
351 Windsor, Performer RPM Heads, Trick Flow R Intake, Lunati 51025 Cam, Comp Pro Magnum 1.6 Rockers, Hedman Headers, Custom Exhaust
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3uQx7WVuVA
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2009, 03:42 AM
plum360415 plum360415 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2
plum360415 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ok my 1st post...5sp Gen1 Lightnings rock!!!!!!!! Ive beeen there done that... sold it in aug. 08.. Went to the state of Washington... I did a conversion from a stock auto E4OD to a Tremec TKO-600... You tube it, NLOC.net it, It worked... lots siad it wouldent work..... it did.......
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 05:12 AM
plum360415 plum360415 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2
plum360415 is starting off with a positive reputation.
It works great with a TKO-600 Been there done it...
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 04:33 PM
phillips91 phillips91 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kingsport Tn
Posts: 1,252
phillips91 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 92f150I6 View Post
The T5 is a good trans, but it more probably wont hold up very long in a truck behind a 351. The trans barley handles the output of a 5.0 mustang.
I don't know what the OP is wanting to do as far as the engine goes, but if he just has a stock lightning then the T5 would hold up great. The non-lightning trucks with 351's came with a T5 and the power on them is pretty close to the same as the lightning.

The stock "rating" on the T5 is somewhere around 300 lbs of torque, but it can handle much more than that. I'm running a stock T5 behind a 351w with over 550 lb/ft of torque in a mustang with 275/60 slicks, 4.56 gears, and launching at 5k rpm. It's not had one problem in 5 years of hard launching, speed shifting, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 09:32 PM
96 ford f150 96 ford f150 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
96 ford f150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
will a stock tranny hold up to a 351w stock 96ford f150 2wd
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2009, 02:13 AM
tricinscap tricinscap is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1
tricinscap is starting off with a positive reputation.
I accept with information: The Mazda 5 speed would have OK ratios for this application, but probably wouldn't last long. The ZF would probably take the power.
___________________
Calculette pret immobilier taux interet | Calculette prets immo | Calcul credit immobilier prets
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2009, 04:08 PM
92f150I6's Avatar
92f150I6 92f150I6 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,241
92f150I6 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by phillips91 View Post
I don't know what the OP is wanting to do as far as the engine goes, but if he just has a stock lightning then the T5 would hold up great. The non-lightning trucks with 351's came with a T5 and the power on them is pretty close to the same as the lightning.

The stock "rating" on the T5 is somewhere around 300 lbs of torque, but it can handle much more than that. I'm running a stock T5 behind a 351w with over 550 lb/ft of torque in a mustang with 275/60 slicks, 4.56 gears, and launching at 5k rpm. It's not had one problem in 5 years of hard launching, speed shifting, etc.
None of the trucks came with the T5 stock. they hd the M5od, and only behind the 300 I6 and the 5.0. I'm glad u had good luck with your t5 cause my one friend grenaded his in 2 years in a 5.0 stang with just intake, exhaust 3:55 gears. Another friend ha=d a supercharged 5.0 stang and went through T5's like they were going out of style. The T5 in my stock stang doesnt like to shift into 2nd under hard acceleration.
__________________
2003 F250 SD 4X4 5.4L 4:10 Arizona Beige
1987 Mustang GT
09 Challenger RT
A bunch of motorcycles, other cars, and a Quad.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
5sp , 5speed , 93 , conversion , f150 , ford , gear , gen1 , lightning , mazda , shift , speed , transmissions , truck , wont

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 PM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Fordฎ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.