Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > 2011 6.7L Ford Diesel
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

2011 6.7L Ford Diesel Discuss the upcoming Ford Powerstroke 6.7L diesel engine






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2009, 10:48 AM
rob_nc rob_nc is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,050
rob_nc is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by poppie View Post
The EPA plan over time,"KILL DIESEL PICKUP'S", they would most likely like to kill OTR truck's,heavy equ and farm equ diesel also but the massive size of said equ does not allow for that to happen, This urea system just add's to the original cost of the truck,the upkeep of the truck , the higher day to day cost of keeping the truck on the road with LOWER MPG and adding in the cost of urea and MORE equipment issue's to inject urea into the engine, the list of issue's of keeping the truck out of the shop over smut control item's that "FAIL" get's ever higher,my son just took his 2004 6.0 F350 4 door Dually in JUST before the 5 year/100,000 mile's were up,58,000 miles on the clock, for turbo lag,sticking EGR,turbo vane's STUCK,Down pipe's cracked and other issue's that cost ford over $5,000 not counting labor,His truck is totaly STOCK, bottom line short,once the 5/100,000 is up,you don't want that on "YOUR" nickel ,meanwhile,my 7 year old 7.3 F 350 4 door dually with an Edge set in tow @ 60 HP has "NEVER" been in the shop!!!!! except for tran's oil change's, both truck's bought new, nuff said, http://www.forddoctorsdts.com/articl...icle-07-02.php ,note the graph on the right

SCR equipped engines will get better fuel economy than the previous generation of engines. DEF costs only add a little more than a half cent per mile to the operating cost of the vehicle. You burn more rubber off your tires in one mile than that.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2009, 10:47 AM
origcharger origcharger is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,856
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE. origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by poppie View Post
This urea system just add's to the original cost of the truck,the upkeep of the truck , the higher day to day cost of keeping the truck on the road with LOWER MPG and adding in the cost of urea and MORE equipment issue's to inject urea into the engine,

They are not going to "inject urea into the engine". It will be injected into the exhaust stream after the DPF and before the SCR catalyst. The use of urea results in less EGR being needed.
__________________
2004 E-450 6.0 139,000 miles
7,500 mile, 15 quart oil changes, 5W-40 Rotella.
UOAs consist of checking for metal on drain plug magnet. All stock, no mods. Dyed fuel with no additives. Never been reflashed.
Total parts replaced;
one EGR valve.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2009, 02:13 AM
richmond2000 richmond2000 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1
richmond2000 is starting off with a positive reputation.
#1 DEF is the same as ADDBLU for the euro cars and all the heavy truck makers Except NAVASTAR will use SCR
#2 Cal transit operators have used SCR since 06
and the tech is proven in europe in large prime movers and gives 2% - 4% improvement to MPG because of less EGR action and EGR is what KILLED fuel econ in the 07!!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2009, 06:54 AM
powerstroke72's Avatar
powerstroke72 powerstroke72 is online now
Big J
2005 Ford F-250
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North America
Posts: 9,400
powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of
Here's Ford's explanation of the DEF and use:

http://media.ford.com/images/10031/S...rtreatment.pdf
__________________
John
2005 F-250 SD Lariat CC 4x4 6.0 TS Auto.
2007 GMC Yukon Denali
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2009, 08:13 PM
SteveBricks's Avatar
SteveBricks SteveBricks is offline
SoCal Chapter LDR
2006 Ford F-250
My Garage
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lakewood, Ca
Posts: 27,037
SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation
Courtesy of NorthTexasPowerstrokes:







Here's a link to their gallery with tons of pics: http://www.northtexaspowerstrokes.co...bum=437&page=1
__________________
NHRDA #4698

SoCal FTE
Join our Chapter *HERE*
9/21/54 - 9/25/09
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2009, 09:32 PM
Lead Head Lead Head is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,647
Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE. Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE. Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE.
Yeesh, I knew those dually fenders weren't gonna be the best looking from the spy shots, but I didn't think they would be that bad...
__________________
- Ian

1987 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 2.9

Needs a lot of work, including some rot on the body, but shes getting there.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2009, 09:35 PM
powerstroke72's Avatar
powerstroke72 powerstroke72 is online now
Big J
2005 Ford F-250
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North America
Posts: 9,400
powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lead Head View Post
Yeesh, I knew those dually fenders weren't gonna be the best looking from the spy shots, but I didn't think they would be that bad...
Yeah, I'm with you there Ian. They may grow on me but I liked the previous ones better. These are marginally better than the Mega-Cab fenders though.
__________________
John
2005 F-250 SD Lariat CC 4x4 6.0 TS Auto.
2007 GMC Yukon Denali
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2009, 09:37 PM
SteveBricks's Avatar
SteveBricks SteveBricks is offline
SoCal Chapter LDR
2006 Ford F-250
My Garage
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lakewood, Ca
Posts: 27,037
SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation SteveBricks has a superb reputation
They would look sweet with a nice big set of super singles sitting under them.
__________________
NHRDA #4698

SoCal FTE
Join our Chapter *HERE*
9/21/54 - 9/25/09
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2009, 09:39 PM
powerstroke72's Avatar
powerstroke72 powerstroke72 is online now
Big J
2005 Ford F-250
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North America
Posts: 9,400
powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of powerstroke72 has much to be proud of
Yeah, I could see that Steve.
__________________
John
2005 F-250 SD Lariat CC 4x4 6.0 TS Auto.
2007 GMC Yukon Denali
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-2009, 12:32 AM
biz4two's Avatar
biz4two biz4two is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 4,204
biz4two has a good reputation on FTE. biz4two has a good reputation on FTE.
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by powerstroke72 View Post
Here's Ford's explanation of the DEF and use:

http://media.ford.com/images/10031/S...rtreatment.pdf

GREAT info provided! Makes all the sense in the world...and IMHO...can give the customer some confidence in the purchase of the 6.7L PSD with the DEF. Especially for folks like me...who have never owned a diesel...and now with another function with the DEF...can make a person shy away.

Thanks again,
biz
__________________

2003 F250 SD SC 142" XLT FX4 V10 Auto 4x4 3.73s
1976 F150 LWB Custom 4x4 390FE NP435 3.50s
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-2009, 10:21 PM
mxer0022's Avatar
mxer0022 mxer0022 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,083
mxer0022 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE. mxer0022 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Man all i have to say is that gauge cluster looks bitchen! sorry about the hijack!

__________________
"Ford, Because Driving A Chevy Will Give You Herpes"
2006 F-250 6.0L powerstroke cc 4X4 amarillo special edition
MBRP 4" T-409 turbo back w/cat delete
autometer Phantom II Pyro, 0-60 boost and tranny temp gauges
SCT Xcal3 w/custom tunes
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2009, 09:56 AM
orr53 orr53 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11
orr53 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Def

4 more sensors, an injector, added consumables cost, plus another converter to choke the flow? Since so many others are using this system, how does it affect the total cost of ownership on an older truck? Will the computer shut down the engine if the system is disconnected, bypassed, or run without the fluid?

BTW those dually fenders look like they use less material and are cheaper to make than the older ones. Maybe that's the idea.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2009, 12:24 PM
glsurratt glsurratt is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 221
glsurratt is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by orr53 View Post
4 more sensors, an injector, added consumables cost, plus another converter to choke the flow? Since so many others are using this system, how does it affect the total cost of ownership on an older truck? Will the computer shut down the engine if the system is disconnected, bypassed, or run without the fluid?

BTW those dually fenders look like they use less material and are cheaper to make than the older ones. Maybe that's the idea.
Somebody calculated the consumeable cost at today's price to be less than 1/2 cent per mile. Peanuts compared to the price of diesel at 20 cents or more these days. TCO will probably balance with regards to fuel costs if they achieve their goal of 25% fuel mileage improvement - cost of the DEF will eat away at some of the fuel savings.

I also thought I read that the Scorpion will use an extra injection cycle at the cylinder injectors for the DPF and get rid of the DPF injector, so that's an even trade.

And the engine computer will issue a low DEF warning on the dash at 500 miles to empty, so there will be plenty of time to find a vendor and refill the tank. If you do run the DEF down to empty, it goes into limp home mode and limits speeds to 25 mph.
__________________
Greg & Jo Ann Surratt
Enjoying Champagne on the King Ranch
2006 King Ranch F-350 Tow Boss PSD CC DRW 4x4
2007 Nuwa Champagne 37CKRD 4 slides with TrailAir
Retired member of the US Navy 1% Club
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2009, 12:32 PM
origcharger origcharger is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,856
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE. origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by glsurratt View Post
Somebody calculated the consumeable cost at today's price to be less than 1/2 cent per mile. Peanuts compared to the price of diesel at 20 cents or more these days. TCO will probably balance with regards to fuel costs if they achieve their goal of 25% fuel mileage improvement - cost of the DEF will eat away at some of the fuel savings.

I also thought I read that the Scorpion will use an extra injection cycle at the cylinder injectors for the DPF and get rid of the DPF injector, so that's an even trade.
Fuel mileage improvement is boasted as being "double digit percentage", thats code talk for 10%-15% tops. DEF costs might eat up the savings from up to as much as 5% of the fuel mileage increase.

There is no DPF injector on the 6.4, its handled the same way on the 6.4 as the 6.7 will be.
__________________
2004 E-450 6.0 139,000 miles
7,500 mile, 15 quart oil changes, 5W-40 Rotella.
UOAs consist of checking for metal on drain plug magnet. All stock, no mods. Dyed fuel with no additives. Never been reflashed.
Total parts replaced;
one EGR valve.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2009, 07:36 PM
mizzitch mizzitch is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 830
mizzitch is starting off with a positive reputation.
I've heard that Urea freezes at 12 deg F.

Has anyone heard how the trucks are going to keep this fluid warm in colder climates?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
60 , 67 , 67l , brands , capacity , coyote , date , diesel , exhaust , f250 , fluid , ford , oil , parts , release , truck , trucks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.