Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Misc. > Oil and Lubrication
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Oil and Lubrication NO MLM Dealers, Wholesale Buyers Or Retailers allowed (except sponsors)
SPONSORED BY:






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2009, 05:41 PM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill 6CylBill is offline
Postmaster
1994 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Guarding the Gates
Posts: 4,020
6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE. 6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE.
What do you guys think?10w30 to 10w40?

Hey guys and galls

I need some thoughts. I don't know much about oil. I use 10w30 weight. My motor has a lot of miles and I was thinking about moving up to a heavier weight oil. My motor doesn't leak or burn any oil between changes, but is this a good reason not to change oil weight?

Is 10w40 the next step up? If so, is it enough to matter?

I don't want to strain my oil pump or anything like that but I would like to help prolong my engine life if possible.

Any information is good information. I've asked about this before but never really came to any conclusions. I'm ready to change oil weight now though.

Thanks guys

-Bill
__________________
GodBlessAmerica!!
GodBlessFTEUsers!
'94 F-150 FlareSide
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2009, 10:06 AM
jimandmandy jimandmandy is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 4,340
jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE. jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE. jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE.
If its not burning oil, then why change anything?

10W-40 is an obsolete grade from the 1970's. Due to poor base stocks and lots of Viscosity Index Improver polymers needed to make that grade, "black death" oxidation sludge was often the result. That was also the fate of those that tried the first 5W-30's as well. Of course, that is not the case today, but with modern oil chemistry 10W-30 does not shear or thin out in a couple of thousand miles like back then. That was the reason for 10W-40 in the first place.

If you feel a need to go up to an xW-40, use 15W-40 instead. It is a modern formulation for diesel and gas engines. Chevron Delo 400 is my favorite. Shell Rotella T is the most popular.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2009, 10:09 AM
whimsey whimsey is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: "Garden State"
Posts: 280
whimsey is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6CylBill View Post
Hey guys and galls

My motor doesn't leak or burn any oil between changes, but is this a good reason not to change oil weight?

Thanks guys

-Bill
An excellent reason. If you've gotten to 214,000 miles using 10W-30 and it's not burning or leaking why change? It's obviously kept your engine in good shape and it likes it. I don't know about "today" but in the recent past 10W-30 oils had better base oils and less viscosity improvers due to the narrower spread in viscosity, which is preferable. If you were burning oil then going to a 10W-40 might give you some relief. But you said you're not burning oil.

If I recall correctly the Motorcraft 10W-30 is now listed as a synthetic blend but the Motorcraft 10W-40 is not.

Just some "food for thought" .

Whimsey
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2009, 12:36 PM
jimandmandy jimandmandy is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 4,340
jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE. jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE. jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE.
BTW, our Camry has 203,000 on it and still gets 10W-30. It only uses 1qt in 6000 miles, mostly external seepage.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2009, 02:56 PM
mprice mprice is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 294
mprice is starting off with a positive reputation.
Shell Rotella 10w30 is awesome stuff for big, old gassers! My '95 302 loves the stuff! Too bad it's so hard to get retail.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2009, 04:31 PM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill 6CylBill is offline
Postmaster
1994 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Guarding the Gates
Posts: 4,020
6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE. 6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE.
Hey, thanks to everyone for your thoughts and opinions. I'll continue using 10w30 with no additives until leaks / burning developes. Thanks again guys!!!!
__________________
GodBlessAmerica!!
GodBlessFTEUsers!
'94 F-150 FlareSide
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2009, 02:14 PM
fraso fraso is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 73
fraso is starting off with a positive reputation.
I think 10W-30 HDEO (like Rotella or Delo) would be a good choice for your '94 too. If you have trouble finding them on store shelves, you can always buy them from a distributor.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2009, 03:05 PM
TheKirbyMan TheKirbyMan is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 683
TheKirbyMan is starting off with a positive reputation.
Glad you got your question answered.

For what it's worth, I've ran Shell Rotella T 15w40 non-synthetic in my '81 F-150's 302 for a number of years now and I have no complaints.
__________________
1981 F-150 Custom 302/C6 9"
FORD: The Best Never Rest!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009, 12:53 PM
Mustang6147's Avatar
Mustang6147 Mustang6147 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,132
Mustang6147 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
My neighbor, tried to sell me on the old shell Rotella T oil, "If it works in semi's, it will be more then I will ever need..." Well he just switched becaus of the guy at twilightzone telling him that... what they didnt tell him was, Shell Rotella was designed for diesels, when they didnt have egr valves, Needless to say, 6 months later, he was lookin for help R & R ing his engine, he trashed.

My opinion, is, it is imperrative the engines oil reccomendations from the mfg are followed, not your opinions, however,,, that being said, it is my understanding that, You could consider running any 5 w oil, not just 2w20 or 5w30, but also 5w40 to. It is my understanding that the first number is the most important. So to say 10w30 is OK but 10w40 is not, is inacurate. because 10w30 or 10w40 is that second number oil with the flow of the first, that is why I understand, that any 5w oil is acceptable, and any 10w oil is not... and surely not 15w whatever.
__________________
06 SuperDuty 4x4 extcb 5.4, TorqShift, 4:10.
90 Mustang 9's, 750 HP Windsor. Ultratech Chassis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pibt-TVgAx4
41 Plymouth 49 dodge flathead6 elec ign.
Sig Sauer P229 Two tone.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-14-2009, 10:23 AM
jimandmandy jimandmandy is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 4,340
jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE. jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE. jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustang6147 View Post
My neighbor, tried to sell me on the old shell Rotella T oil, "If it works in semi's, it will be more then I will ever need..." Well he just switched becaus of the guy at twilightzone telling him that... what they didnt tell him was, Shell Rotella was designed for diesels, when they didnt have egr valves, Needless to say, 6 months later, he was lookin for help R & R ing his engine, he trashed.

My opinion, is, it is imperrative the engines oil reccomendations from the mfg are followed, not your opinions, however,,, that being said, it is my understanding that, You could consider running any 5 w oil, not just 2w20 or 5w30, but also 5w40 to. It is my understanding that the first number is the most important. So to say 10w30 is OK but 10w40 is not, is inacurate. because 10w30 or 10w40 is that second number oil with the flow of the first, that is why I understand, that any 5w oil is acceptable, and any 10w oil is not... and surely not 15w whatever.
What?

1. Delo 400, Rotella T, etc, are gasoline engine oils as well, not diesel only, per the API ratings.

2. They have more dispersants/detergents, so how is that damaging to EGR's? Modern diesels DO have EGR valves.

3. How exactly was the engine "trashed"? EGR failure alone does not damage an engine, only increases NOx emissions.

I dont understand you last paragraph. SAE J-300 defines how motor oil viscosity is measured and rated. The numbering system for multi-viscosity oils is a little confusing. The first "W" number stands for Winter, but the number is only an index that points to minimum recommended starting temperature, based on a Cold Cranking Simulator test.

http://www.finalube.com/reference_ma...ngine_Oils.htm

Note that 15W is good down to -20C (+4F). Thats still colder than it ever gets here.

The second number is the viscosity measured at 100C (212F). A higher number will help lower oil consumption, but at the expense of a slight decrease in gas mileage, a trade-off.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-14-2009, 11:17 AM
fraso fraso is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 73
fraso is starting off with a positive reputation.
Heavy Duty Engine Oil

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustang6147 View Post
My neighbor, tried to sell me on the old shell Rotella T oil, "If it works in semi's, it will be more then I will ever need..." Well he just switched becaus of the guy at twilightzone telling him that... what they didnt tell him was, Shell Rotella was designed for diesels, when they didnt have egr valves, Needless to say, 6 months later, he was lookin for help R & R ing his engine, he trashed.

My opinion, is, it is imperrative the engines oil reccomendations from the mfg are followed, not your opinions, however,,, that being said, it is my understanding that, You could consider running any 5 w oil, not just 2w20 or 5w30, but also 5w40 to. It is my understanding that the first number is the most important. So to say 10w30 is OK but 10w40 is not, is inacurate. because 10w30 or 10w40 is that second number oil with the flow of the first, that is why I understand, that any 5w oil is acceptable, and any 10w oil is not... and surely not 15w whatever.
Yes, you're right, it is important to follow the recommendations of the manufacturer. However, you are incorrect about engine oil viscosities.

If your neighbour required a 5W-20 in his engine and he used a 15W-40 instead, then perhaps this may have contributed to his engine failure but I think there is more to the story than the use of the wrong viscosity. If he required a 10W-30, then he should have absolutely no problems at all with using Shell Rotella T 10W-30. FWIW, a Ford Engineer recommends using 5W-30 rather than 5W-20 in mod motors (see Corner Carver posting)

A multigrade engine oil has 2 parts to the viscosity specification. If you require 5W-30, the 5W specification means that the oil has cold flow properities of an SAE 5W-weight oil. The 30 specification means that it has the hot flow properties of an SAE 30-weight oil (9.3 - <12.5 cSt @ 100°C).

Therefore, if the OEM specified a 10W-30, you should be able to also use 5W-30 and 0W-30 as these grades are still in the same hot viscosity range as the 10W-30 but make the engine easier to start in cold weather. Because synthetics (by their nature) flow extremely well at cold temperatures, 0W-30 oils are generally synthetics. The main differences between a Starburst Oil and an HDEO is that HDEO generally have higher levels of antiwear additives (ZDDP) and no friction modifiers (for potentially slight lower fuel economy).

As for lowering oil consumption, there is a BITOG theory that higher hot viscosity oils reduce consumption isn't necessarily true.

ACCCC Engine Oil Article
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-15-2009, 02:03 PM
Mustang6147's Avatar
Mustang6147 Mustang6147 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,132
Mustang6147 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Use what the mfg reccomends... But if you choose not to, like my neighbor, then at least its not my vehicle...
__________________
06 SuperDuty 4x4 extcb 5.4, TorqShift, 4:10.
90 Mustang 9's, 750 HP Windsor. Ultratech Chassis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pibt-TVgAx4
41 Plymouth 49 dodge flathead6 elec ign.
Sig Sauer P229 Two tone.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-15-2009, 02:12 PM
mprice mprice is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 294
mprice is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustang6147 View Post
Use what the mfg reccomends... But if you choose not to, like my neighbor, then at least its not my vehicle...
And if the manufacturer recommends a SL in 10w30 then Shell has a Rotella for you.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-15-2009, 03:05 PM
jimandmandy jimandmandy is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 4,340
jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE. jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE. jimandmandy has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
...

As for lowering oil consumption, there is a BITOG theory that higher hot viscosity oils reduce consumption isn't necessarily true.
That BITOG post only mentioned it as a rare case, not at all typical. I have found that in modern engines, especially OHC, that intake valve seals and/or stem and guide wear is more significant than the ring area in oil burning. That is why "high mileage" oils can be so effective, due to swelling of the intake seals.

It is true that "normal" oil consumption varies between engines and it is unreasonable for the public to expect not to add any oil between changes, but thats the way many think today. I had a GM 4.3 V-6 that must have had low tension rings or some such thing because from new, it used about a quart every 2500 miles or so. After a shot of seal conditioner, the 200,000 mile Camry is down to a pint of 10W-30 every 3000 miles. In a more extreme case, the Supra was visibly smoking at 150,000 and straight SAE 40 stopped the smoke. Cold starting was not an issue as we were living in Hawaii at the time.

Grandpa never bought another Ford product is whole life after his 1932 flathead V-8. Those first year models did have a flaw that resulted in a quart every 300 miles in many cases. But the reputation damage had been done. It was Chevy, Studebaker and Plymouth after that.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2009, 08:41 AM
fraso fraso is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 73
fraso is starting off with a positive reputation.
I believe 440Magnum on BITOG is trying to say that functional oil rings can control oil consumption better with thinner oils than with thicker oils.

BITOG: Toyota TSB On Oil Use
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
10w , 10w30 , 10w40 , 30 , 40 , 400 , 99 , difference , engine , f150 , ford , motorcraft , oil , rotella , truck

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 PM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.