Modular V10 (6.8l)  

Power range of the V-10

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 07-26-2009, 06:15 PM
now05EX's Avatar
now05EX
now05EX is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my 05 EX gets 14-16.5 on highway at 68 to 72 mph. the range depends on wind conditions this is average for the truck its seen 17 on a 350 mile trip with tail wind the better part of the trip but that is really pampering the 6.8 not realistic mileage by any means. my 03 7.3 EX didn't get 18-19 on a regular basis with 4" exhuast, CAI, and programmer at 67-70 no wind maybe 18-20 any wind at all and it dropped just like the gassers due.
 
  #32  
Old 07-26-2009, 08:07 PM
FreakinGenius's Avatar
FreakinGenius
FreakinGenius is offline
New User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Destroya
Cat removed= Illegal and really nets you nothing but more noise. Cats have come a loooong way since 1972. They no longer hinder performance.

'00 Excursion V10 getting 18 mpg = B.S., the 7.3L diesel guys barely get that. I believe the best place for you to peddle you lies is over at thedieselstop.com. You'll be more welcomed there.

4"+ pipes on a gas engine = Worthless unless you have a 1200+hp twin turbo car.

Cherry bombs on a V10 = Bet that sounds like CRAAAAAAAAP.

FreakinGenius was great name selection on your part. (see the word "sarcasm" in a merriam-webster dictionary)
Why would you call me out about my mpg and not the other guy whose mpg was even higher. 13.5 towing is crazy.

Im not to crazy about cats. Ever looked in one they got a lot of stuff in them. If they were so great and didnt hurt power then race cars would have them.

4" flows better and the chery bombs do to. I like the sound. It was ooud with just one but I put another behind it.
 
  #33  
Old 07-26-2009, 08:59 PM
1085's Avatar
1085
1085 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: grenville
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just got my 2009 f350 v10 4/4 2 weeks ago and have 900 km on it.i m starting to see 15.5 mpg on highway and 10 in town.it s getting better all the time but don t exspect much better.
1085
 
  #34  
Old 07-26-2009, 10:46 PM
Bob Bru's Avatar
Bob Bru
Bob Bru is offline
New User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Littleton, Co
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm in shock. My 2004 Ford f250 v10 gets about 8-9 miles a gallon. I dont know what size rear it has, but I have changed the fuel filter and that didnt change much. I drive around town, not too much beating on it and not a lot of towing. What else could be up?????
 
  #35  
Old 07-27-2009, 12:41 AM
AlaskanEx's Avatar
AlaskanEx
AlaskanEx is offline
Bleed Ford Blue

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 13,574
Received 128 Likes on 43 Posts
i have a '04 excursion v10 4x4 w/ 3:73s basicly toatly stock. i see 10.5 in town and almost 15mpg on the highway. i'm not real light on it either.
 
  #36  
Old 07-27-2009, 09:16 AM
Milwaukee1979F150's Avatar
Milwaukee1979F150
Milwaukee1979F150 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Trenton, MI
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Bru
I'm in shock. My 2004 Ford f250 v10 gets about 8-9 miles a gallon. I dont know what size rear it has, but I have changed the fuel filter and that didnt change much. I drive around town, not too much beating on it and not a lot of towing. What else could be up?????

Sound like my friend with 01 F250 5.4L that get horrible mpg 3-11.

Are you drive slow or you have lead foot like try get from 0 to 45 in 6 sec?
 
  #37  
Old 07-27-2009, 10:21 AM
Bob Bru's Avatar
Bob Bru
Bob Bru is offline
New User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Littleton, Co
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I get on it every now and then, but generally drive non aggressively. I live 3/4 mile from where I work, so I don't put on a lot of mileage. maybe 6000 miles a year. I just get crappy gas mileage.
 
  #38  
Old 07-27-2009, 05:23 PM
Destroya's Avatar
Destroya
Destroya is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bill11012
If it will pass tail pipe the cat does not matter in Texas.
I pulled them off of a police interceptor crown vic and got 3/10s better 0 to 60, so yes cats do hurt the performance.
It put out less tail pipe crap with the cats off than the spec for a stock crown vic.
Texas is a state, catalytic converters are required as per FEDERAL law.

Federal law is greater than Texas law, no matter what you Texans think.
 
  #39  
Old 07-27-2009, 07:39 PM
1085's Avatar
1085
1085 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: grenville
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don t drive it to hard but like i said in town its hard enough.maybe the 3 valve is just better on gas.the best thing is to fill it up and take it for a good ride.check your milage when you get back.
 
  #40  
Old 07-27-2009, 08:38 PM
bill11012's Avatar
bill11012
bill11012 is offline
Modular motor junkie
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Vestroia
Texas is a state, catalytic converters are required as per FEDERAL law.

Federal law is greater than Texas law, no matter what you Texans think.
they do not check it.
you pull the cat, cut off the heat shields and cut the cat in half.
you take out the crap inside and then weld it back together.
you put the heat shield on so that it covers the welds on the cat.
if they check it looks factory.
 
  #41  
Old 07-27-2009, 09:03 PM
bucci's Avatar
bucci
bucci is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Jessup, PA
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by FreakinGenius
If they were so great and didnt hurt power then race cars would have them.

Probably because they can't find one that will take the extreme heat.
 
  #42  
Old 07-27-2009, 09:07 PM
bucci's Avatar
bucci
bucci is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Jessup, PA
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by FreakinGenius
4" flows better and the chery bombs do to. I like the sound. It was ooud with just one but I put another behind it.
You can't say 4" flows better as a generic/blanket statement. However you could say 4" has a bigger capacity/volume. If you lose velocity you lose flow and performance.
 
  #43  
Old 07-28-2009, 05:13 PM
Outpost22's Avatar
Outpost22
Outpost22 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Medford USA!
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like a lot of guys are looking at their trip computers ( ) instead of hand calculating fuel mileage.

After 9 years, my V10 had a best mpg of 15.4 doing 63-65 mph on the freeway (4x4 auto with 3.73). On the turn around trip it got 13.3 at 75 mph (which is about what it does in normal driving). Average mpg in town has always been 9-11 mpg.
Recently I took it on a trip with a cabover camper towing a utility trailer. The rig averaged an honest 10.8 mpg Hand Calculated. This is covering MANY mountain passes in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming and Oregon.
 
  #44  
Old 07-28-2009, 10:00 PM
AlaskanEx's Avatar
AlaskanEx
AlaskanEx is offline
Bleed Ford Blue

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 13,574
Received 128 Likes on 43 Posts
i allways hand calculate my MPG on every fillup. i also mark down the milage and cost of each fillup. i've kept every recipt since i got the truck. my overhead MPG is very close to my hand calculated numbers. withthin .3 of a mpg.
 
  #45  
Old 07-29-2009, 04:00 PM
1085's Avatar
1085
1085 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: grenville
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I check by hand and 10-12 in town and up to 15 on highway.i just turned 1000 km so still not broke in yet.as i put on the km s i ll keep you guys informed.
Ford 2009
4.10 rear
auto
v10
 


Quick Reply: Power range of the V-10



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 PM.