Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic and Antique Trucks > 1987 - 1996 F150 And Larger F-Series Trucks
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

1987 - 1996 F150 And Larger F-Series Trucks SPONSORED BY:






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2009, 06:29 PM
dallasdave dallasdave is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
dallasdave is starting off with a positive reputation.
Brake line fittings

I am going to bypass the RABS on my 1992 f150 does anyone know what size female adaptors I need to splice the brake line around the module. they look to be two different sizes.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2009, 12:32 PM
timbersteel timbersteel is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 242
timbersteel is starting off with a positive reputation.
Dallasdave,

Might want to try the brake forum on this site.

Also, try exhausting the search feature for related article's. It's been improved since this site was acquired by another company, use to have to wait a minute after each search if you were not a Premium member. Big improvement now.

Also, why would you want to bypass the RABS? Seems to be a dangerous idea for a vehicle that was built and programmed for...

If you bypass it, (I also own a 92 F150, 4.9L, I-6), you are also bypassing the electronic swith, which in turn, also warns you in the DASH that your braking system has obvious problems, and needs prompt attention. If you go thru with this, then I would advise tearing the dash out and removing the bulb for the Rear ABS illumination. Also, anytime you run codes, it will come up saying it's malfunctioning.

If you are trying to skimp on paying for a new RABS module , (which should be expected after 17 years, a buddy just changed his that was rusted inside and wasn't working, picked one up at the junk yard), you may not find any help with it, since it's a critical part of the '92's braking system.

If you're just gonna use the truck on a farm or gravel, with no obvious signs of heavy traffic, or where you could be involved in heavy braking, then maybe you could get away with it. I personally advise against it, since i'm usually pessimestic about altering critcal part that affect driveability.

Also if you are involved in a wreck, no matter how small or large, if the vehicle is investigated, if it is noticed that a critical braking system part was altered, i.e., you removed the RABS, you can be denied coverage and also be blacklisted further in the future by other vehicle insurance companies..<-Murphy's Law applies here. Try to the think of serverity, not simplicity.

These are only a few things I can think off. I hope I didn't ruin your day and if anyone else wants to chime in with a remedy or idea, or has done it, I'll let them takeover and you can disregard what I have posted.

I hope I didnt step on any toes and I know that vehicles have been on the road a long time without RABS. Just wanted to point it out that I know you can.

"Murphy's Law - Anything that can go wrong will."

Every solution breeds new problems.

Hope this helps!
__________________
1992 F-150 I6 4.9L 300 110K 4x4
2004 Dodge Hemi, 4x4, 1500, 20K

"He's one brick shy of a load..."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2009, 12:53 PM
quicklook2's Avatar
quicklook2 quicklook2 is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Posts: 10,767
quicklook2 has a very good reputation on FTE. quicklook2 has a very good reputation on FTE. quicklook2 has a very good reputation on FTE. quicklook2 has a very good reputation on FTE.
it would be impossible to check over every vehicle wreck and all the parts that were wrecked or crushed.

we would need a billion dollars to pay for all the csi employees.

to see that the rabs was missing would be 1 in 10,000,000.
__________________
"To believe is to know you believe, and to know you believe is not to believe." ~ Jean-Paul Sartre
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2009, 01:44 PM
timbersteel timbersteel is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 242
timbersteel is starting off with a positive reputation.
Yes Quicklook2, that's true. But why is it that if you are caught tampering with Smog components, you can be fined, yet we do it every day in states that do not check emissions.

Seems to be that any "Reputable" INSPECTION STATION were too catch this, he would fail. So add another inspection fee and the repair of the RABS.

But your right, Millions of dollars to investigate, maybe that's why when there are casualties of a vehicle wreck, most insurance companies want answers, and thats why they usually have a claims specialist come inspect the vehicle after the wreck or accident. And add fault and the BIG pay-outs, another reason "WE" all pay higher premiums. I would never get over the fact of something stupid, if it were a manner of a couple of bucks.

Just like in the owners manual of new vehicles, the computer is used to investigate accidents now, especially if the seat belt wasn't fastened. You can check, it's the "automobiles" new black box, just like aircraft.

I'll keep with Murphy's Law and a bit of comon sense.
__________________
1992 F-150 I6 4.9L 300 110K 4x4
2004 Dodge Hemi, 4x4, 1500, 20K

"He's one brick shy of a load..."
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2009, 01:49 PM
quicklook2's Avatar
quicklook2 quicklook2 is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Posts: 10,767
quicklook2 has a very good reputation on FTE. quicklook2 has a very good reputation on FTE. quicklook2 has a very good reputation on FTE. quicklook2 has a very good reputation on FTE.
in california the computer has the smog items with pics that they look at.

in ohio they don't have such info.

you asked about after an accident and most are too damaged to look at.

as to checking all brake systems, they would need every possible variation for every possible vehicle and a way to see which each needed, exactly.

way to much cost for very little gain.
__________________
"To believe is to know you believe, and to know you believe is not to believe." ~ Jean-Paul Sartre
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 PM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.