Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Small Chassis Trucks > Bronco II
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 10:42 AM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill 6CylBill is offline
Postmaster
1994 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Guarding the Gates
Posts: 4,011
6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE. 6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE.
Will be looking for a Bronco II

Hi guys and gals.

I'll be looking for a Bronco II hopefully within the next year. I'm actually going to be looking for a small 4x4 truck of any type, but I really want a Bronco II for the enclosed back seat.. And because I love these little machines.

I don't know anything about Bronco II's. I would like to know what are the pro's and con's. I have heard the 2.9L is gutless, but it's just like the 3.0L? If this is the case, I'm in love with the three liter and wouldn't mind the 2.9 at all. My I6 is a gutless wonder so I doubt I would even notice a difference anyway.
I have also heard Bronco II's axles aren't made for large tires at all. Would 31x10.5's be fine?

What are some things to look for in a Bronco II? Or Ranger pickup, for that matter.

Oh, it may be note worthy to add my goals are to use this as a daily driver in winter, and off road toy.

Again, I want to know the pros and cons, and I want your opinions on these Machines.

Something else too. What gear ratio's did Ford put in these little 4x4 beasts?

Thanks again

-Bill
__________________
GodBlessAmerica!!
GodBlessFTEUsers!
'94 F-150 FlareSide
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 02:03 PM
Eddiec1564 Eddiec1564 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Punta Gorda, Fla
Posts: 501
Eddiec1564 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Bronco 2's only had the 2.9L engine in them or the older (84 to 86) had the 2.8L V6. They have 5 speed manuals and that imfamous A4LD 4spd OD auto tranny. 3.73 ratio seams to be a common one for the automatics, 3.27 for manuals from all the junk yarding I seen(reading the tags on rearend). Most had the dana 28 front and Ford 7.5 rearend unless you find the late 1990 year B2's, they should have the D35 front and 8.8 rear axles. 31" tires may be a tight fit without body lift or hacking fenders. Kernel-panic on this forum should know more about that.
__________________
89 F250 2x4 302/AOD 4.10 gears ,now on road.
89 Bronco2 with dead A4LD again
84 F250 4x4 300/np435 3.55 gears. The BLUE MULE shut down due to cab cancer(looking for good cab)
95 E350 bus conversion 460/E4od 4.10 the new toy!
85 Plymouth Caravelle 2.5L someday to get the hairdryer treatment(turbo)
93 explorer now just a woods buggy
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 02:10 PM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill 6CylBill is offline
Postmaster
1994 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Guarding the Gates
Posts: 4,011
6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE. 6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddiec1564 View Post
Bronco 2's only had the 2.9L engine in them or the older (84 to 86) had the 2.8L V6. They have 5 speed manuals and that imfamous A4LD 4spd OD auto tranny. 3.73 ratio seams to be a common one for the automatics, 3.27 for manuals from all the junk yarding I seen(reading the tags on rearend). Most had the dana 28 front and Ford 7.5 rearend unless you find the late 1990 year B2's, they should have the D35 front and 8.8 rear axles. 31" tires may be a tight fit without body lift or hacking fenders. Kernel-panic on this forum should know more about that.
Thanks you for the information. I want to say I don't plan on modding the bronco if I find one (other than what needs to be done). I don't plan on lift kits or gear ratio changes. I just want something realiable I can jump in and know the 4x4 system works.

I don't care about tire size. I'm more worried about what the Bronco can actually handle. I don't want to break anything by running too large of a tire.

Thanks again!
__________________
GodBlessAmerica!!
GodBlessFTEUsers!
'94 F-150 FlareSide
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 08:33 PM
Eddiec1564 Eddiec1564 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Punta Gorda, Fla
Posts: 501
Eddiec1564 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
With stock tires I have seen the B2's crawl through some mean mud and trails. My B2 is only 2x4 but I have had it in some slop and it handled good. It went through sugar sand better than my F250 4x4(bad case of wheel hop in 2hi). I be leary of the electronic shift 4x4. I have seen many pickups,explorers and Bronco2's stuck with malfunctioning shift controls and motors.
__________________
89 F250 2x4 302/AOD 4.10 gears ,now on road.
89 Bronco2 with dead A4LD again
84 F250 4x4 300/np435 3.55 gears. The BLUE MULE shut down due to cab cancer(looking for good cab)
95 E350 bus conversion 460/E4od 4.10 the new toy!
85 Plymouth Caravelle 2.5L someday to get the hairdryer treatment(turbo)
93 explorer now just a woods buggy
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 08:52 PM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill 6CylBill is offline
Postmaster
1994 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Guarding the Gates
Posts: 4,011
6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE. 6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE.
I've been doing some research and it sounds ike the B2's have a lot of problems, one of the biggest being the 2.8L V6 motors. I would rather hear from real people though. Thanks again Eddiec1564!
__________________
GodBlessAmerica!!
GodBlessFTEUsers!
'94 F-150 FlareSide
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 09:02 PM
70torino429 70torino429 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 853
70torino429 is starting off with a positive reputation.
get a fullsize bronco with a 5.0L would be my opinion.

a friend of mine had a 87 ranger with the 2.9 i think, and it was horrendous. he bought a BroncoII which was in a little better shape, but still gutless.

You think the 4.9 is gutless? oh boy, wait till you drive something with a 2.9L. They tend to rust up quick around here too, since there general construction isnt that strong. ive heard they're offroad capability is nothing to be proud of either, but i cant really say from personal experience on that one.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 10:05 PM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill 6CylBill is offline
Postmaster
1994 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Guarding the Gates
Posts: 4,011
6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE. 6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70torino429 View Post
get a fullsize bronco with a 5.0L would be my opinion.

a friend of mine had a 87 ranger with the 2.9 i think, and it was horrendous. he bought a BroncoII which was in a little better shape, but still gutless.

You think the 4.9 is gutless? oh boy, wait till you drive something with a 2.9L. They tend to rust up quick around here too, since there general construction isnt that strong. ive heard they're offroad capability is nothing to be proud of either, but i cant really say from personal experience on that one.
I didn't mean all four nines are gutless.. Mine sure is, though.

Yeah Chris I've been doing research and I think a BII would be a mistake. They seem to be one of Ford's mistakes. From what I'm reading, these things are plauged with problems and are prone to be Found On Road Dead.
__________________
GodBlessAmerica!!
GodBlessFTEUsers!
'94 F-150 FlareSide
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 10:26 PM
70torino429 70torino429 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 853
70torino429 is starting off with a positive reputation.
i assume your trying to find a second vehicle for winter?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:05 PM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill 6CylBill is offline
Postmaster
1994 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Guarding the Gates
Posts: 4,011
6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE. 6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70torino429 View Post
i assume your trying to find a second vehicle for winter?
Yes sir, and a play toy for the trails around here. I want something small. I'm even including old Toyota's if I can find one.
__________________
GodBlessAmerica!!
GodBlessFTEUsers!
'94 F-150 FlareSide
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:20 PM
70torino429 70torino429 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 853
70torino429 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6CylBill View Post
Yes sir, and a play toy for the trails around here. I want something small. I'm even including old Toyota's if I can find one.
hmm, well i can think of a lot of good matches for that. an older 4.0L explorer would be a good option, and of course theres tons of jeeps. my personal favorite is the late 90s gmc jimmy/ oldsmobile bravada with the 4.3 v6 when it comes to light 4wds.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:30 PM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill 6CylBill is offline
Postmaster
1994 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Guarding the Gates
Posts: 4,011
6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE. 6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70torino429 View Post
hmm, well i can think of a lot of good matches for that. an older 4.0L explorer would be a good option, and of course theres tons of jeeps. my personal favorite is the late 90s gmc jimmy/ oldsmobile bravada with the 4.3 v6 when it comes to light 4wds.
Oh really? Did you own a Bravada? 4.3 is a good engine, they last a good while.

I've always loved Jeeps but you can forget touching them. They hold their resale value like Toyota Tacoma's do. For me to be able to afford a Jeep it would have to be in very poor condition from what I've seen.
__________________
GodBlessAmerica!!
GodBlessFTEUsers!
'94 F-150 FlareSide
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2009, 01:53 AM
Jab'sBronco2 Jab'sBronco2 is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 25
Jab'sBronco2 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Of course you can always dump the 2.9 and upgrade to the 302, it can be done, I am working on the 302 swap on my 89bII its going smoothly just dont have much time to focus on that project.

Then you get that 2.9 to do its famous "Tick" ( Not to be mistaken for rod knocking )
You will definatly want to upgrade to the 302.... because the louder the tick gets in a already gutless BII is very Embarassing.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2009, 06:41 AM
tommyleea tommyleea is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 204
tommyleea is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jab'sBronco2 View Post
Of course you can always dump the 2.9 and upgrade to the 302, it can be done, I am working on the 302 swap on my 89bII its going smoothly just dont have much time to focus on that project.

Then you get that 2.9 to do its famous "Tick" ( Not to be mistaken for rod knocking )
You will definatly want to upgrade to the 302.... because the louder the tick gets in a already gutless BII is very Embarassing.
I agree; ditch the 2.9. I bought the BII, because I like the body style. My 2.9 has been a nightmare. Maybe I got the bad one, but I will never have another 2.9. Head gaskets and cracked heads have been my issues. Already took care of the knock/tick with a fresh rebuild. Can't get to the distributor. I thought it might be handy for the wife, but with just two doors it's not. Mine actually is kind of peppy though. Cheers

TommyJ
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2009, 12:53 PM
70torino429 70torino429 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 853
70torino429 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6CylBill View Post
Oh really? Did you own a Bravada? 4.3 is a good engine, they last a good while.

I've always loved Jeeps but you can forget touching them. They hold their resale value like Toyota Tacoma's do. For me to be able to afford a Jeep it would have to be in very poor condition from what I've seen.
yeah jeeps are pricey.

And nah, i didnt have a bravada, but my friend had a 99 gmc jimmy (basically the same thing) that i did all the work for. Even stock it held its own offroad very well and tore through the snow. Then we added some 31's, reprogrammed the ecu, better intake, high flow cat and a dual exhaust, shift kit and the thing really came to life, you had to ease the throttle taking off from a stop or the tires would squeal in 2wd. Honestly i thought that made the best offroad rig, you had the power and grunt of a 351 bronco, but in a smaller package that could still manage 18mpg.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2009, 10:11 PM
Eddiec1564 Eddiec1564 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Punta Gorda, Fla
Posts: 501
Eddiec1564 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6CylBill View Post
I've been doing some research and it sounds ike the B2's have a lot of problems, one of the biggest being the 2.8L V6 motors. I would rather hear from real people though. Thanks again Eddiec1564!

Ok, if my answers offend, sorry then......
__________________
89 F250 2x4 302/AOD 4.10 gears ,now on road.
89 Bronco2 with dead A4LD again
84 F250 4x4 300/np435 3.55 gears. The BLUE MULE shut down due to cab cancer(looking for good cab)
95 E350 bus conversion 460/E4od 4.10 the new toy!
85 Plymouth Caravelle 2.5L someday to get the hairdryer treatment(turbo)
93 explorer now just a woods buggy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.