1976 d44 to 1979 d60 steering swap
#1
1976 d44 to 1979 d60 steering swap
I found a complete 1979 snowfighter dana 60 front end with steering box, pitman arm complete hub to hub for 200 bucks! I about peed my pants, haha anyway Im getting ready to drop my 44 and power assist ram crap, for this steering box setup and was looking for some info if it will bolt up on a frame bold pattern, or if I need to drill. Thanks alot, Sam
#3
The box itself will not bolt right up, the frames and crossmember are different. You will have to modify the crossmember and re-drill the frame to acommodate the new box. Now, once you have this, chances are that unless you are suer awesome with the tape measure you will have an issue with the length of the drag link. Since the leafs and frames net different ride heigths, you will have an issue with the length of the drag link. I can wager that you will not nail the exact length perfectly. Since they are not adjustable, you will have a crooked steering wheel and you may have a limited turning radius to one side.
That being said, you have some work ahead of you, but as long as you have the fabricaion hat on, you might consider crossover steering. As long as you have to fab up a drag link anyway, the crossover will be about the same price.
That being said, you have some work ahead of you, but as long as you have the fabricaion hat on, you might consider crossover steering. As long as you have to fab up a drag link anyway, the crossover will be about the same price.
#5
#6
The design of a push pull system cant eliminate bumpsteer. There will always be some level of bumpsteer during suspension cycle.
Now with rather flat springs, the axle does not move towards the shackle as much as a spring with greater arch would so the problem is monimozed however the problem still exists.
That being said, this is much of the reason why we do not see this design any longer. The inverted "T" design virtually eliminates this problem, as does a true crossover design.
Now with rather flat springs, the axle does not move towards the shackle as much as a spring with greater arch would so the problem is monimozed however the problem still exists.
That being said, this is much of the reason why we do not see this design any longer. The inverted "T" design virtually eliminates this problem, as does a true crossover design.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sam's1967
WTB - Parts & other
1
07-24-2014 04:54 PM
FordVee
Brakes, Steering, Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
8
06-24-2014 06:28 PM
Sam's1967
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
06-21-2014 09:41 AM
Rusty_Old_F250
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
30
05-22-2014 09:21 PM