Front/rear gear ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-24-2002, 05:41 PM
MustangGT221's Avatar
MustangGT221
MustangGT221 is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Topsfield, MA
Posts: 14,947
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Front/rear gear ratios

My truck has a 3.55 in the rear and 3.54 in the front. I know that they are suppose to be within 1% of each other. They are stock gears so i would assume that is the way it is suppose to be. Why do they do that, is it to help with binding when in 4x4?


Primary rig is Green Thunder:
95' F-150 XLT 4x4, 302, 5 spd, MSD 6A, Flowmaster American Thunder Exhaust, Sunroof, CD player with 2 10" subs and some 32" BFG Muds .

Check out my Gallery for a look-see.


Then theres:
99' Mustang GT 4.6L
88' F-250 Superduty 4x4 351/c6
95' Mercury Cougar 4.6L V-8
80' E-350 300/6 with a
3 spd column shifter. Top speed is 65mph, Go Baby Go!

 
  #2  
Old 07-24-2002, 09:21 PM
4x4x4x4's Avatar
4x4x4x4
4x4x4x4 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Front/rear gear ratios

[updated:LAST EDITED ON 24-Jul-02 AT 10:22 PM (EST)]I don't know why they are different other than maybe because of different manufacturers between the two axles.I can say that with the front axle pulling a little faster your truck will want to track straight in slippery conditions.For example,nailing the throttle in snow and steering at the same time your truck will remain relatively straight.That is if you don't turn the wheel all the way or close to it.
 
  #3  
Old 07-24-2002, 09:56 PM
Brian460's Avatar
Brian460
Brian460 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Paola, KS
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Front/rear gear ratios

That's just the differnce in the axles as to what gears are available, just like in my dad's old 77 F-250 it had 4.09 front and 4.11 rear, I think it is the same way in the 91 F-250.


Brian
 
  #4  
Old 07-24-2002, 10:49 PM
kspilkinton's Avatar
kspilkinton
kspilkinton is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: South Kitsap County, WA
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Front/rear gear ratios

That's why the 'cases are part timers. A true full time case would have to allow for the slipping needed to drive on hard packed surfaces similar to limited slip rears. Even if the ratios were matched, without a way to cause the binding to go away (i.e. clutch pack slippage) you'll have a very expensive repair bill and a lot of down time.

-Kerry
 
  #5  
Old 07-25-2002, 12:06 AM
MustangGT221's Avatar
MustangGT221
MustangGT221 is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Topsfield, MA
Posts: 14,947
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Front/rear gear ratios

Yeah that happens because the tires arn't exactly the same size and don't spin at the same speed. But does having 3.55 rear and 3.54 front help to keep the binding to a minimum, vs both having 3.55s?


Primary rig is Green Thunder:
95' F-150 XLT 4x4, 302, 5 spd, MSD 6A, Flowmaster American Thunder Exhaust, Sunroof, CD player with 2 10" subs and some 32" BFG Muds .

Check out my Gallery for a look-see.


Then theres:
99' Mustang GT 4.6L
88' F-250 Superduty 4x4 351/c6
95' Mercury Cougar 4.6L V-8
80' E-350 300/6 with a
3 spd column shifter. Top speed is 65mph, Go Baby Go!

 
  #6  
Old 07-25-2002, 03:28 AM
rebocardo's Avatar
rebocardo
rebocardo is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 13,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Front/rear gear ratios

One thing to think about the ratios being different is are they really different?

When you consider the radius of the front tire is usually smaller than the rear, due to it being compressed with the greater weight of the engine, is there really a difference in an unloaded truck?

 
  #7  
Old 07-27-2002, 08:25 PM
kspilkinton's Avatar
kspilkinton
kspilkinton is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: South Kitsap County, WA
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Front/rear gear ratios

It doesn't do a thing as far as getting rid of binding. That is accomplished through the use of 4wd on a slick surface. I have a 3.54 front and 3.50 rear, stock. It doesn't matter whether the lower ratio is in the front or the rear, or even if they are matched. As long as the 1% or less is met and you use it as directed, binding shouldn't be a problem and can't be relieved by the ratio difference. You are talking about a tiny difference in the overall numbers. Don't get me wrong the closer the numbers the better, but like I said we aren't talking about true full time cases.

For your next homework assignment: calculate how much force is being applied by the engine and surface on which the vehicle is traveling on every component in the drivetrain. Assume ideal conditions.

-Kerry
 
  #8  
Old 07-27-2002, 08:36 PM
kbmc4's Avatar
kbmc4
kbmc4 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Alice USA
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Front/rear gear ratios

there is really no difference between 3.55 and 3.54 gears these are calculated ratios they are really the same gear like 4.11 and 4.10
 
  #9  
Old 07-27-2002, 10:11 PM
kbmc4's Avatar
kbmc4
kbmc4 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Alice USA
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Front/rear gear ratios

If you have a pinion with 11 teeth and a ring gear with 39 teeth your gear ratio is 3.5454 your gear ratio diff. I believe is a rounding change and not a true gear change
Bryan
 
  #10  
Old 07-29-2002, 10:48 AM
jimandmandy's Avatar
jimandmandy
jimandmandy is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 5,228
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Post Front/rear gear ratios

Your front is a Dana 44 and the rear is a Ford 8.8. One mfg rounds the number up and the other down. It is really the same.

Jim
 
  #11  
Old 07-29-2002, 11:40 AM
lee's Avatar
lee
lee is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 1,040
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
Front/rear gear ratios

Hi all,

Very interesting thread. I can't remember where I heard it but I read/heard that the difference in ratios was intentional to maintain a small amount of tension on the drive line. This was to prevent gear "slapping" or "banging" when coming on and off the throttle. In other words the drive line is in constant tension without slack and the gears have no room to bang. Anyway, that's my story and I'm sticking to it!

Lee
 
  #12  
Old 07-29-2002, 02:49 PM
rspurge's Avatar
rspurge
rspurge is offline
New User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Front/rear gear ratios

 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xcv_tmf
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
11-07-2015 05:14 PM
78 4X4 Thunder
Cooling, Heating, Ventilation & A/C
2
11-23-2002 02:53 PM
MustangGT221
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
22
11-12-2002 02:44 PM
MustangGT221
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
9
10-15-2002 08:08 PM
MustangGT221
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
28
09-01-2002 03:26 PM



Quick Reply: Front/rear gear ratios



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.