Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2009, 10:06 PM
uncle.stosh uncle.stosh is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Out of here
Posts: 2,641
uncle.stosh has a good reputation on FTE. uncle.stosh has a good reputation on FTE.
240 or 250 inline six?

Is it me or is the title to this sub-forum wrong?

I thought Fords were 240's and Chevys were 250's.....

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2009, 12:40 AM
85e150six4mtod 85e150six4mtod is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,866
85e150six4mtod has a great reputation on FTE. 85e150six4mtod has a great reputation on FTE. 85e150six4mtod has a great reputation on FTE. 85e150six4mtod has a great reputation on FTE. 85e150six4mtod has a great reputation on FTE.
Chev had a 250, and so did Ford. It was a tall block version of the 200, intro'd in the late '70s. It had the sbf V8 bell pattern also, unlike the 200.

It had the same crapo integral intake for the head, but you can find ways around that, as many have:

Classic Inlines Ford 200/250ci Aluminum Cylinder Head Specifications

More Six:

Fordsix Performance :: View Forum - 144-250 "Small Block" Six Performance

Foreign Six:

Fordsix Performance :: View Forum - Aussie Ford Sixes

So there you go.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2009, 01:09 AM
kernel-panic's Avatar
kernel-panic kernel-panic is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Yokosuka, Honshu, Japan
Posts: 1,772
kernel-panic is starting off with a positive reputation.
Yeah, I noted that they didn't include all of the inline engines that were in trucks, too. Early Broncos had the 170 CID engine, IIRC. Maybe we can get the powers that be to change it to "Ford Inline Six, 170, 200, 250, 240, 4.9L/300" Although, part of that would negate everything since I don't recall the 250 ever being anything but a car engine and I don't think it ever made it's way into any Bronco or F-series from the factory
__________________
1987 Bronco II XLT 2.9L V-6 5-Spd 4x4
'xplorer coils & leafs, MT/R 30x9.50s, 2 1/2" cat-back

2004 Toyota Tacoma Xtracab SR5 3.4L V-6 5-Spd 4WD
(K&N air, all else is bone stock!)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2009, 05:53 AM
66fdtrucknut 66fdtrucknut is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Eastern Shore, Md.
Posts: 850
66fdtrucknut has a good reputation on FTE. 66fdtrucknut has a good reputation on FTE. 66fdtrucknut has a good reputation on FTE.
Don't forget the 223's
__________________

62' F-100 SWB uni 223
65' F-100 SWB 352
78' F-150 Ranger XLT 351M
09' F-150 LWB 4.6
I know I don't have a 66'....long story
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2009, 06:54 AM
tomw tomw is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: suburban atlanta
Posts: 2,169
tomw is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Well, you really should include the 144. I bought an ex-SnapOn Econoline, imagine how much weight that guy carried all the time, that had a 144. Three on the tree, no heat in winter, frozen king-pins, not even a radio. But it had extra-heavy duty springs. And a 144. I think the ridge was about 1/32". It went back and forth between Indianapolis and Glen Haven many times before being rolled down the side of a mountain.
tom
__________________
It's not how hard you work, it's how much you get done. Simplificate and add lightness
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2009, 07:46 AM
uncle.stosh uncle.stosh is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Out of here
Posts: 2,641
uncle.stosh has a good reputation on FTE. uncle.stosh has a good reputation on FTE.
Is it me or is fordsix fubar?

When you click on most of the posts you get a blank page. I tried 2 different pc's and 3 different browsers and no luck.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2009, 08:06 AM
66fdtrucknut 66fdtrucknut is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Eastern Shore, Md.
Posts: 850
66fdtrucknut has a good reputation on FTE. 66fdtrucknut has a good reputation on FTE. 66fdtrucknut has a good reputation on FTE.
Fordsix Performance :: Index
Maybe this one will work or it's some sort of filter thing going on.
Charlie
PS- can't forget the 262's either
__________________

62' F-100 SWB uni 223
65' F-100 SWB 352
78' F-150 Ranger XLT 351M
09' F-150 LWB 4.6
I know I don't have a 66'....long story
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2009, 09:04 AM
uncle.stosh uncle.stosh is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Out of here
Posts: 2,641
uncle.stosh has a good reputation on FTE. uncle.stosh has a good reputation on FTE.
It's not the index or threads that don't work.

When you try and view a thread a lot (but not all) return a mostly blank page. I tried to email the web master but it got returned as undeliverable......

It kinda sucks. There is a lot of good info there that you can't get at.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2009, 09:08 AM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill 6CylBill is offline
Postmaster
1994 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Guarding the Gates
Posts: 4,004
6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE. 6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE.
We all know the best six ever made was the 2.9L in the S-10's. 350 horsepower stock, 52 MPG and a lifespan often exceding 450,000 miles!

Why do we even bother with our pathetic 300's and 240's with a mere 140 horse and 13 miles to the gallon? Let's all rip'em out and drop in the mighty TWO NINE.

<_<) (-_0) (>_>
__________________
GodBlessAmerica!!
GodBlessFTEUsers!
'94 F-150 FlareSide
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2009, 10:49 AM
rikard rikard is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Reading Mass
Posts: 488
rikard is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'm having the same problem with the Ford performance six site too. I tried it on two different computers/servers and I get a blank page when trying to open individual posts.

I've had the 300, 223, and 144 Ford sixes along with the 250, 235 Chevy, 170, 225, slant six, 250 flathead Chrysler, and the 258, 4.0 AMC sixes. The Jeep engine s were the most powerful but the 300s power comes in at a lower rpm and in my experience is easier to work on. I also had a Nissan SD33 turbo diesel in a 1980 IHC Scout.
I don't like many of the V6s but have had several. They do produce good Hp for the size, most get good gas mileage, and are shorter in length and weight than there I6 counterparts.
Fastest was my 2.8 V6 SFI in my 5 speed Beretta.
regards
rikard
__________________
Present-1995 Black F150 SC XLT 300 5 Spd
Past-1994 Red F150 SB XL 300 5 Spd
1983 Red F150 SB XL 302 AOD
1962 USPS 2.5 ton stepvan converted camper
223 3 speed DRW
1956 Red F100 Ma Bell uility bed 223 3 Spd
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2009, 10:49 AM
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
AbandonedBronco AbandonedBronco is offline
Elder User
1981 Ford Bronco
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 924
AbandonedBronco is starting off with a positive reputation.
Fordsix is owned by a single guy who pays for it through his business I believe, so it comes out of his pocket. It's an awesome site with tons of great resources, but since it's not a top of the line (cost) forum, it does have a few technical difficulties now and then. I usually find if it doesn't work, I'll just come back an hour later.
__________________

4bbl Holley 390 w/ Offenhauser DP intake. 4 speed Manual w/OD. K&N air filter, EFI manifolds, 2.5" exhaust.
3.00 rear end and 2000 RPMs @ 80mph!

Boise, Idaho
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2009, 10:50 AM
flipklos flipklos is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wahpeton ND
Posts: 848
flipklos is starting off with a positive reputation.
6cylbill you should problobly go in the airconditioning and sit down. That southern heat has gone to your head.

What about the 226 flathead everyone? That was the base engine for 3 years.

The falcon sixes seen alot of use. In many apps. What about the early ohv engines?

I think Im with 6cylbill-2.9.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2009, 12:24 PM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill 6CylBill is offline
Postmaster
1994 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Guarding the Gates
Posts: 4,004
6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE. 6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipklos View Post
6cylbill you should problobly go in the airconditioning and sit down. That southern heat has gone to your head.

What about the 226 flathead everyone? That was the base engine for 3 years.

The falcon sixes seen alot of use. In many apps. What about the early ohv engines?

I think Im with 6cylbill-2.9.
Hot diggity, it won't be for long brother! We're moving to WV and we're just as excited as can be!

I wonder how a Jeep 4.0 I6 would do in a half ton pickup? I bet it would make a good hauler and daily driver, but can it pull? This is assuming the machine is stock. Four liter's can be built to make respectable power.
__________________
GodBlessAmerica!!
GodBlessFTEUsers!
'94 F-150 FlareSide
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2009, 01:45 PM
Harte3 Harte3 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,281
Harte3 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Probably more upgrade options available for the AMC/Jeep engine...quite the popular vehicle. A fellow I know built one for his wife to go mud dragging.
__________________
1983 F150 300 I6, Comp Cam 260h and lifter kit, Port/Polished head, Offy DP Manifold, Holley 4160/1848-1 465 cfm, EFI Exhaust manifolds, Walker Y Pipe to 3-Way Cat, generic Turbo Muffler, Recurved DSII, Mallory HyFire 6a & ACCEL Super Stock Coil, Taylor Spiro Pro Wires, EFI plugs.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2009, 02:18 PM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill 6CylBill is offline
Postmaster
1994 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Guarding the Gates
Posts: 4,004
6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE. 6CylBill has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harte3 View Post
Probably more upgrade options available for the AMC/Jeep engine...quite the popular vehicle. A fellow I know built one for his wife to go mud dragging.
Have you ever drove a stock 4.0? I never got to drive it but I jumped in a Cherokee one time and barely touched the gas pedal.. that thing jumped forward. A lot of power stock. I wish our 300's had the horse those Jeep six's have. The best of both worlds; good low end power and peppy horsepower.
__________________
GodBlessAmerica!!
GodBlessFTEUsers!
'94 F-150 FlareSide
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.