1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

1950 255ci Flathead Merc in a 1952 F1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-20-2009, 05:30 PM
kellybeefarm's Avatar
kellybeefarm
kellybeefarm is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Buckley, Wa
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1950 255ci Flathead Merc in a 1952 F1?

Just picked up a Flathead Mercury 255 to put in my 1952 F1. Is the 255 Merc basically the same thing as the Ford 239 but with a larger crank? Will it just bolt right in my truck? The engine runs but I plan on doing a complete overhaul before putting it in. Really glad I found this forum! Very cool!!!!

Sean Kelly
 
  #2  
Old 04-20-2009, 07:01 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,800
Received 607 Likes on 377 Posts
Sure it fits -- new member Sac52 just posted a pic of his in the "Show us your engine" thread, p. 4

Be sure yours looks just like his when you finish!

Welcome to the forum!
 
  #3  
Old 04-20-2009, 09:02 PM
sac52's Avatar
sac52
sac52 is offline
New User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Congratulations on your excellent choice of power plant. Everybody loves a flathead, at least those who know what "real style" is do!
There is no exterior difference between the 239 and 255, you actually have to measure the stroke to really tell the difference (don't trust what the heads say). The water pumps are the difference between car and truck engines as they are the front engine mounts, just make sure you get the correct ones for your application.
 
  #4  
Old 04-20-2009, 09:45 PM
havi's Avatar
havi
havi is offline
I'll have the Roast Duck
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northshore, MN
Posts: 9,600
Received 45 Likes on 28 Posts
Let me say welcome to both of you! my water pumps were Mercury (car?), and my heads said 8BA, and I was hoping the crank was Merc. Engine was painted and rebuilt by PO. Had a 50/50 chance, and it ended up a stock Ford. Good luck with both of your trucks!
 
  #5  
Old 04-20-2009, 11:35 PM
jmadsen's Avatar
jmadsen
jmadsen is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,315
Received 27 Likes on 18 Posts
Welcome to the FTE, the 1950 F1 I picked up in December had a 49 or 50 Mercury Flatead in it. they didn't bother to change the water pumps either, they just used a set of custom made wooden blocks (3X3 or 4X4 ?) and really long bolts to mount the engine.

the mercury intake manifolds have the 4 bolts for a different carb, you can interchange the intakes from ford as well, and as stated above most everything is interchangable with Ford. If you order new piston's they are specific for a merc due to the larger crank throw.
what oil pan does the merc have? A stepped one or one for for car? you may need a truck oil pan (rear sump) most of them have the large cleanout inspection cover.

Cheers

Josh
 
  #6  
Old 04-21-2009, 08:25 AM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,800
Received 607 Likes on 377 Posts
Originally Posted by jmadsen
... they didn't bother to change the water pumps either, they just used a set of custom made wooden blocks (3X3 or 4X4 ?) and really long bolts to mount the engine.
.....
Cheers

Josh
LOL, my PO didn't even bother with wood, just had the oil pan resting on the drag link. (Ford car engine)
 
  #7  
Old 04-21-2009, 08:46 AM
53OlderThanMe's Avatar
53OlderThanMe
53OlderThanMe is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Highland Village, TX
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the Mercury cranks also have a larger bolt on the nose of the crank than the smaller stroke Ford. Don't recall the sizes though.
 
  #8  
Old 04-22-2009, 02:35 PM
kellybeefarm's Avatar
kellybeefarm
kellybeefarm is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Buckley, Wa
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool, thanks for all the input guys! I think I will be picking your brains for a while as I go through restoring this engine.
Haven't really started tearing the engine down yet. I had surgery on my left hand so it's sorta slow going, doing everything one handed. I did manage to get the intake off and she looks pretty clean inside, like I could just fire her up right now! Inside I found stamped on the block, 1BA. From what I read online, the engine is a 1951 Merc. Different from what the guy who we bought it from said. Can't wait to dig in deeper and measure the stroke. The mercs had a 4" inch, if I remember right where the Fords had a 3.75".

Thanks again guys!

Sean Kelly
 
  #9  
Old 04-22-2009, 04:31 PM
-Jim G's Avatar
-Jim G
-Jim G is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have a Mercury engine in my 1952 M-1

I don't know the size. Were the Canadian Mercury Truck engines 255 ci? I assumed it was 239 ci.

Whatever it is it sure runs great!
 
  #10  
Old 04-22-2009, 05:29 PM
jmadsen's Avatar
jmadsen
jmadsen is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,315
Received 27 Likes on 18 Posts
yep the Mercs have the larger displacement (255) per the 4" stroke vs the Ford 3&3/4" stroke.

here is a great site I find myself going back to quite often.
Flathead Specifications: 1949-53 V8

Cheers
Josh
 
  #11  
Old 04-22-2009, 05:37 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,800
Received 607 Likes on 377 Posts
Originally Posted by -Jim G
I have a Mercury engine in my 1952 M-1

I don't know the size. Were the Canadian Mercury Truck engines 255 ci? I assumed it was 239 ci.

Whatever it is it sure runs great!
I didn't think the Merc trucks had 255's either; the VanPelt table is for car engines. At the time, trucks were focused on operating economy, the Merc engines were all Ford had in the way of an "upgrade" engine for luxury cars.
 
  #12  
Old 04-22-2009, 06:03 PM
jmadsen's Avatar
jmadsen
jmadsen is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,315
Received 27 Likes on 18 Posts
Well, Ok Im definitly no expert on the matter. LOL
I thought all the late style flatheads had the same stock bore of 3.1875" so if it had a larger stroke ie the 4" crank vs the 3.75" you would have a larger displacment, ?

So now I'm wondering? So Jims truck (M1) is in fact a mercury truck with a mercury engine but only has a 3.75" crank??? I'm confused, but maybe learning something new here today as well.

I wasn't under the impression that the Vanpelts site was just dealing with cars? hmmm I do sometimes tend to miss things when reading?

I guess if some mercury engines (trucks) came with a 3.75" crank then thats a very good example of just because it says merc on it does not neccesarily mean its got a 4" stroke! need to measure it to be certain!

Josh
 
  #13  
Old 04-22-2009, 06:58 PM
havi's Avatar
havi
havi is offline
I'll have the Roast Duck
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northshore, MN
Posts: 9,600
Received 45 Likes on 28 Posts
I would measure it to be certain in case of a rebuild in its last 50+ years of life. No telling what was put in there.
 
  #14  
Old 04-23-2009, 06:57 AM
-Jim G's Avatar
-Jim G
-Jim G is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
mercurypickup.com

I was looking on the internet and I found this reference for 1948-51 engine sizes in Mercury Trucks: 1948 thru 1951 Canadian VIN Plate

I think that it is likely that my truck has a 239 ci engine.
 
  #15  
Old 04-23-2009, 08:38 AM
podney's Avatar
podney
podney is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 30 mi N of Mpls
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would measure

Jim-- Measure to find out. Because SIZE MATTERS!!!


 


Quick Reply: 1950 255ci Flathead Merc in a 1952 F1?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.