Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Small Chassis Trucks > Ranger & B-Series
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series modelsSPONSORED BY:






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009, 12:02 PM
94maskedranger 94maskedranger is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 10
94maskedranger is starting off with a positive reputation.
Can i make my ranger faster

I have a 1994 ranger 3.5L V6. I am wondering is there anyways to get more speed and horsepower thats not going to break my bank. I already have a custom injection kit, custom (not stock) spark plug wires, and a complete straight pipe set up: 1.5 in pipe off of the headers all the way back, no catalytic converter or muffler in the way. Needless to say it has a nice little rumble to it and it can move on down the road pretty quick.. is there anyway i can increase my acceleration or top speed without running me broke?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009, 12:54 PM
racsan's Avatar
racsan racsan is offline
Posting Guru
1993 Ford Ranger
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: central ohio
Posts: 1,457
racsan is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
3.5? there was a 3.0 v6 and later a 2.5 I-4 but ive never known of a ford 3.5 V6. you could increase the low-end by putting in lower geras, but the top end will drop off, anything beyond 70 is a bit much for the ranger chassis anyhow, its a small truck, not a mustang. it just isnt ment to go stupidly fast. the suspention and brakes are far from whats safe at high speeds.
__________________
'93 Ranger Supercab,4.0L,4x4 5spd-hurst equipped. mile marker manual hubs. "the green machine" http://www.myspace.com/small_dog_trucking
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3216869
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009, 01:19 PM
94maskedranger 94maskedranger is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 10
94maskedranger is starting off with a positive reputation.
well it might not be the original engine i bought the truck used. it can definately handle 70 without a problem i run up and down the interstate quite often at about 75 or 80. i have maxed the truck out and i was pushing it around 115 or 120, and the brakes don't have a problem stopping it, i just replaced the pads and rotors. i guess i would just like a way to get it to accelerate faster and run lower rpm's at higher speeds. it idles at about 500 and running 80 is 2500 rpm. i know bigger tires than the 15's its got on there now could help with that but i was wondering if there was anything else. like would it be worth my time to invest in a supercharger or turbo, or is that kinda pointless right now. i plan on one day having this as a show/drag truck, i just thought i might start working on the smaller things now.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009, 02:34 PM
wendell borror wendell borror is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,130
wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE.
If has the 3.5, thats a 265 hp engine, should have plenty of power. However, I'm betting it's the 3.0. Find out for sure and let us know. If it's a V-6, it should be either the 3.0 or 4.0, but we need to know. Ford did come out with a 3.5 in the last couple of years, it's a dohc engine that makes 265 hp, A lot of us wish we had one in our rangers.
__________________
2009 FORD RANGER fx4 off/road, 5-speed manual, torson diff and rancho's!

2008 mercury mariner 4x4 V-6, automatic.

1987 jeep wrangler, 258, 5-speed
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009, 09:00 PM
michigan66 michigan66 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Saginaw, MI
Posts: 580
michigan66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Bigger tires will lower you RPMs, but it will take you longer to get up to speed. Its the same effect as going from a 3.73 rear end to a 3.45 one. You may also lower your gas mileage with bigger tires or a lower ratio.
__________________
1991 XLT, 2.3 SOHC, M5OD manual, 3.45 7.5" axle
Valvoline Synthetics in Trans., Diff.;
Motorcraft Blend in Engine
225/70 x 14 Bridgestone Dueler APT III tires,
90 K miles., std. cab, long bed, fiberglass topper
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2009, 12:24 AM
sfcwoodret sfcwoodret is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,322
sfcwoodret is starting off with a positive reputation.
Performance tune it. Smaller wheel size/lightweight rims. Equal weight distribution for maximum traction. Better suspension. Performance wires and coil. Drop weight off the front end. Performance tires made for speed. Shorty antenna to cut air resistance. If you get those done let me know for more suggestions.
__________________
2006 Ranger XLT
2007 Ford Escape XLT
2007 Ford Mustang Premium
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2009, 06:12 AM
wendell borror wendell borror is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,130
wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE.
We really due need to know which engine for sure, because the different engines react differently to mods, it's not one piece fits all with these ranger V-6's. There's more stuff out that will enance a 4.0 compared to the 3.0. I've done a few ranger engine hop up's and can help you if I know your engine size. If you do indeed have the 3.5, you don't need mods, just a good set of brakes to slow that powerfull beast down and maybe a parashute attached to the tailgate.
__________________
2009 FORD RANGER fx4 off/road, 5-speed manual, torson diff and rancho's!

2008 mercury mariner 4x4 V-6, automatic.

1987 jeep wrangler, 258, 5-speed
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2009, 09:43 AM
Bear River Bear River is offline
Former Vendor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 4,901
Bear River has a very good reputation on FTE. Bear River has a very good reputation on FTE. Bear River has a very good reputation on FTE. Bear River has a very good reputation on FTE.
Believe it or not, but running it with a cat will make it quicker. I've seen cats shave 2 tenths of a second off track cars.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2009, 06:26 AM
wendell borror wendell borror is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,130
wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE.
I believe it. I've lost lowend torque by removing the cat on my jeep. It runs much better with the cat on and it's legal.
__________________
2009 FORD RANGER fx4 off/road, 5-speed manual, torson diff and rancho's!

2008 mercury mariner 4x4 V-6, automatic.

1987 jeep wrangler, 258, 5-speed
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2009, 02:08 AM
94maskedranger 94maskedranger is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 10
94maskedranger is starting off with a positive reputation.
alright so i did a little digging around, the engine is a 4.0 not a 3.5 like i was told, the tires are 217/75R14's. i also know for a fact that the exhaust is straight off of the headers, because the guy i bought the truck from had cut off the muffler system and right where the bed meets the cab he had took a glass pack that he had cut open and hollowed out and called it a tip. i didnt like this because the exhaust was blowing on the rear shocks so i had that cut off and ran 1.5 inch pipe back and angled out under the right side of the bumper. on the subject of mod's i have found a turbo i am thinking about purchasing, and i am thinking about dueling out the exhaust. the debate on glass packs is still up in the air but i really dont want to be pulled over for "disturbing the peace" because my truck rumbles a little to loud. any more suggestions?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2009, 02:10 AM
94maskedranger 94maskedranger is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 10
94maskedranger is starting off with a positive reputation.
oh and my truck is a Ranger STX one i havent really seen that many of or really heard of until i bought this one.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2009, 06:45 AM
wendell borror wendell borror is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,130
wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE.
If you want a good dual catback with a nice low rumble, try the gibson daul sport or split catbacks......gibson performance.com. As far as real mods for the 4.0, check with super six motorsports and morana motorsports. They can really get your 4.0 up and running. Tom Morana even has a 4.5 stroker kit for the push rod 4.0. A lot of good information on those two sites.
__________________
2009 FORD RANGER fx4 off/road, 5-speed manual, torson diff and rancho's!

2008 mercury mariner 4x4 V-6, automatic.

1987 jeep wrangler, 258, 5-speed
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2009, 08:03 PM
piotrsko's Avatar
piotrsko piotrsko is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Reno
Posts: 644
piotrsko is starting off with a positive reputation.
turbo's and dual exhaust aren't compatible unless you buy two turbo's, one for each side. don't really need two, unless you need to make more than 20 lbs boost which would tend to shred the crankshaft out of the engine.

You can split the exhaust after the turbo for that dually look. not much gain however. Turbo's lose that rumble since they are kind of a muffler, but straight pipes will attract cops like honey does flies. turbo's do have a jet noise which really distinctive and annoying.

I myself prefer a "sleeper" car since the puzzled look is very amusing as you leave the other guy in your dust.

fast cheap (kinda): Nitrous oxide and a wet or dry fogger system. that will add HP until you explode the engine, BUT OH MAMA, will it be fast for a while.
__________________
2000 PSD CC LOOOOOng bed 6spd for the next 20 years (or more) AKA Oklahoma stretch limo
86/87/88 Ranger 2.9 XLT (same truck long story) 88 ranger 2.9 4X4 lifted 20 some inches (parts car)
2003 FOCUS 2.3 5 spd (her car)
4 lines all 2pt.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 04:05 PM
94maskedranger 94maskedranger is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 10
94maskedranger is starting off with a positive reputation.
yea i already have straight pipes i think the dual would be overkill and now that i know that about the turbo i think i'll leave it single exhaust, i was considering a nos setup but that is still in the not so near future. the truck is kinda already a sleeper because the little tuner cars that pull up beside at the red light dont know what hit them when they want to race and i leave them at the light. i'm getting serious about the turbo, and maybe some other minor things, better air filter, shaving the handles, antenna, and tailgate. i am also considering putting 16's where it is now sitting on 14's. nothing too major for now, just looking to up the performance so i can leave those cocky little tuners staring at my taillights. i am also considering getting a performance chip. any suggestions?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2009, 10:00 AM
wendell borror wendell borror is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,130
wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE.
You will need to get a JET chip, as the bama engine programers only work on the 96 and later OBD II rangers.
__________________
2009 FORD RANGER fx4 off/road, 5-speed manual, torson diff and rancho's!

2008 mercury mariner 4x4 V-6, automatic.

1987 jeep wrangler, 258, 5-speed
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
40 , a4ld , chip , engine , fast , faster , ford , hop , i4 , make , parts , performance , pointless , ranger , rangers , shift , trans

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.