1961 - 1963 F100 Unibody 1961, 1962 and 1963 Ford F100 Unibody trucks

61-64 Floorboards vs 65/66

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-03-2009, 08:11 PM
37 Ford guy's Avatar
37 Ford guy
37 Ford guy is offline
Posting Guru

Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,255
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
61-64 Floorboards vs 65/66

I'm in the market for a 61-66 F100 and I've noticed a difference in the floorboards/leg room between the 61-64 and the 65/66. Does anybody know what that difference is in terms of inches or comfort level? I'm guessing it also affects one's choices for adding different seats, too, right?
This is a great site. I'm enjoying learing about these cool trucks from you guys and hopefully will be posting up one of my own soon.
Thanks.
Randy
 
  #2  
Old 04-04-2009, 05:38 AM
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker
jowilker is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Posts: 24,552
Received 46 Likes on 44 Posts
Randy FYI: There is a world of difference between the 64 and 65 year models.

64 back had straight front axles, good trucks but upgrade parts like power steering and brakes are super expensive.


In 65 Ford introduced the Twin I-beam front axle that were used through 96. There are many windows open that were not available before 65.

There is minor body changes from 61-66 and if you don't have one pulling at you, I would suggest going to a 65-66 if just for the modern parts available.



John
 
  #3  
Old 04-04-2009, 09:19 AM
37 Ford guy's Avatar
37 Ford guy
37 Ford guy is offline
Posting Guru

Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,255
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by jowilker
Randy FYI: There is a world of difference between the 64 and 65 year models.

64 back had straight front axles, good trucks but upgrade parts like power steering and brakes are super expensive.


In 65 Ford introduced the Twin I-beam front axle that were used through 96. There are many windows open that were not available before 65.

There is minor body changes from 61-66 and if you don't have one pulling at you, I would suggest going to a 65-66 if just for the modern parts available.



John
Thanks for the response, John. Yes, I was aware of the other changes you mentioned with suspension, grilles etc.The suspension is not such a big issue because I want to do the Crown Vic front end swap anyway. I love the look of the short unibody but don't know if I'd be happy with the less legroom, steering column angle, etc.
 
  #4  
Old 04-04-2009, 12:11 PM
BIG DADDYS 62 UNI's Avatar
BIG DADDYS 62 UNI
BIG DADDYS 62 UNI is offline
New User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am 6ft 3in and am a big boy, as in 4 bills. The leg room is a little tight but with the factory seat and the angles of the column it is tight bit feels ok. You can tell by my name what I have, and yes it is a shorty as well. I have no ps and a 10inch chain link steering wheel. It is your choice, comfort or cool. I put comfort second. Happy hunting.
 
  #5  
Old 04-04-2009, 12:28 PM
66fdtrucknut's Avatar
66fdtrucknut
66fdtrucknut is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Eastern Shore, Md.
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I may be in the minority but I like the feel of the 61-64's, with your feet higher and stepping up to get in.
Charlie
 
  #6  
Old 04-04-2009, 01:08 PM
37 Ford guy's Avatar
37 Ford guy
37 Ford guy is offline
Posting Guru

Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,255
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yeah, I gotta admit the "cool factor" is very high on the shorty unibody, especially with a low stance and nice rims! Shorty 66 is another one who is doing some really cool stuff with his 66 shorty. I guess if I really wanted to test my fabrication skills, I could cut the firewall & floorboards out of the unibody and install the firewall & floorboards from a 65/66! Then I could have the best of both worlds! Either way, they are both very cool trucks. I'll get it sorted out and let you guys know what I come up with.
Has anybody tried changing the angle of the steering column in the Unibody with different front suspension? Just curious how that works out?
Thanks again for the input.
Have a great day guys.
 
  #7  
Old 04-05-2009, 11:13 AM
Wyatt66f100's Avatar
Wyatt66f100
Wyatt66f100 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
I got a 66 long bed and i've never been happyer. i think the grill that came in the 66 are the best out side looking part. as for the inside, the leg room is good and im 6 foot. always perfered the metal dash rather then the leather one. and when you look, look for floor boards thats the only spot that isnt resoration fixable because replacement floorboards skip 66
 
  #8  
Old 04-06-2009, 02:15 AM
Pro-Street/StateTK's Avatar
Pro-Street/StateTK
Pro-Street/StateTK is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: East Flat Rock NC
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really like the 61--64 the last one that I drove of these years was a 1964 it was mine I was

17 years old, I restored a 1969 ranger before I bought the 64 I really liked both of the

old trucks. I found a 1965 (X state truck) for my dad when he was looking to buy a truck, I found this truck for him when I was 15 YEARS OLD!

I did all the body work on this 1965, when I was 15 also, I really started liking this old truck when he would let

me drive it on the (DIRT ROADS) when I was 15 years old ! Then when I bought a 1971

when I was 18 years old, and I drove that truck for years, after that I went though lots,and

LOTS of dentsides I fixed up lots of these trucks, and really started liking these the best!

The main reason for the love of the dentsides was the (BRAKES)! Now I know There are

Lots of good kits to make for a more safe ride brake wise on the 61--64 so that is a real plus

Bottom line is I vote for 65 and up, btw. My 65 has had 1978 brakes for years and Loving

it!

P.S. These 78 brakes on the 65 of mine, cost little to nothing! Gota love that?

Wally Womack
 

Last edited by Pro-Street/StateTK; 04-06-2009 at 02:22 AM. Reason: adding info
  #9  
Old 04-06-2009, 03:49 PM
garbz2's Avatar
garbz2
garbz2 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Seat mounts are in the same position for 61 through 66. All the difference is in the firewall and front floor boards/trans tunnel as the later floors are extended forward and down. The steering wheel is also higher and at a flatter angle on the 65 66 cabs.

Garbz
 
  #10  
Old 04-06-2009, 07:39 PM
37 Ford guy's Avatar
37 Ford guy
37 Ford guy is offline
Posting Guru

Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,255
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by garbz2
Seat mounts are in the same position for 61 through 66. All the difference is in the firewall and front floor boards/trans tunnel as the later floors are extended forward and down. The steering wheel is also higher and at a flatter angle on the 65 66 cabs.

Garbz
That's what I thought Garbz. Thanks for the confirmation.

For you guys who have switched to later model seats, what seats are you using that still look good in that cab? Buckets or bench? Do you gain much seat room by mounting the fuel tank under the bed?

Thanks for all the input guys.
Randy
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
66v8baby
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
02-07-2017 12:47 PM
ihcc104
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
05-21-2016 11:20 AM
ID Scrounger
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
12
04-29-2016 01:10 PM
mal68ibu
Ford Truck Parts for Sale
13
02-05-2016 09:36 PM



Quick Reply: 61-64 Floorboards vs 65/66



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM.