6.4L Power Stroke Diesel Engine fitted to 2008 - 2010 F250, F350 and F450 pickup trucks and F350 + Cab Chassis

I think I might sell it!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 03-12-2009, 12:01 PM
KIOTI's Avatar
KIOTI
KIOTI is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 66stang351
With my 450 I get 12.5-13.5 normal running around, 14-15 highway and 8.5 towing the 17k 12 foot high 5th wheel. The 8.5 towing included several long climbs going from OR to SoCal and back. With the Gear Vendor OD I can get it up to 16-17 on the highway.

What's the gear vendor overdrive?
 
  #17  
Old 03-12-2009, 03:37 PM
JohnD333's Avatar
JohnD333
JohnD333 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 773
Received 93 Likes on 69 Posts
Kioti,

What 66stang tells you about the best mileage to expect is correct. I have 2008 Job 1 450 w 4:30; pulling a 12' tall 5th wheel camper with total rig at scales 25,000# including 450.

Best I get empty is 15 if going 45-50 (2k RPM's) on rural roads. Highway empty is 14.5 at 70 MPH; 12.5 at 60 MPH - go figure!! However, when it regens, which is for 10 minutes every 120 miles or so (yes that ofter) the mileage for that period is about 7 to 9 mpg running empty at 60 MPH. I use lie-ometer for the regen mileage figures, both lie-omenter and actual calculated readings are very close when running empty. Lie-ometer often say I get better than 10 towing but it just isn't so.

Pulling my 40' 15k# camper at 60 I have gotten 10 MPG once; for the most part it is 9.5; once as low at 8.5 in hills of W Virginia. Seems the same whether using tow/haul mode or not. Lie-ometer is really off when towing.

It was a bit worse when new (now 22k miles). Improvements (0.25 to 0.5 onhighway and 2 MPG in town/rural riads) were seen when I added the Job 2 air dam (helps high speed MPG) below the front bumper and got the flash last summer that eliminated the regen at idle that was causing all of the fuel in oil. If you haven't had the December 2008 reflash - get it; way better low end power and more solid and earlier shifting at lower speeds (the latter only if not in tow/haul mode).

Regarding programmers, I understand that for most, and your heavy load may be the perfect use/exception, they don't do anywhere near as much for the 450's as they do for the 250's, as they add low end HP that we have plenty of due to our rear end ratios. I understand programmer provides maybe 1 MPG improvement for the 450 (vs 3-4 with a 3.73 rear end 250) and not much power difference unless hauling a real heavyload - but that sounds like it may fit you well. And of course the best improvments and mileage (like pre-emisison-era mileage) come if you remove the DPF (and run DPF delete tunes). Thise alterations can create extra work for you if you need warranty work and feds EPA may bite you one day. Tuner forums have lots of onfo on tha If $ is no object, overdrive and the programmer/exhaust may be what you need, using OD only in selected configurations/speeds.

Mine has been in the shop so many times for so many weeks that I couldn't possibly consider a tune until I get the basics fixed. Cab off twice, wiring harness, high end turbo, 2 radiatiors, trans control module, intermittant wire harness fault, turbo cooler, leaks like I can't believe...
Love it as a tow rig, I have my "hotel" when it is on the shop, just glad I don't need to rely on it to make a living.



Gear Vendors under/overdrive transmissions the most awarded auxiliary transmissions.

Gear Vendors Under/Overdrive, Ford 4X4 Wheel Drive auxiliary transmissions.

is a $3k solution that will give you the equivalent rear end ratio of a 250 (3.73) or even lower if you ask them. A 450 has more drag thana 250 but the lower RPM's and turbo boost should get an extra MPG or so for any given speed.

Best of luck to you.

JohnD333
 
  #18  
Old 03-12-2009, 03:44 PM
F250Wheels's Avatar
F250Wheels
F250Wheels is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The gear vender is A good option, I don't tow Alot of weight so I installed 3:73 gears.
 
  #19  
Old 03-12-2009, 04:20 PM
mikey2000's Avatar
mikey2000
mikey2000 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by F250Wheels
The gear vender is A good option, I don't tow Alot of weight so I installed 3:73 gears.
What kind of mileage are you getting unloaded?
 
  #20  
Old 03-13-2009, 06:42 AM
F250Wheels's Avatar
F250Wheels
F250Wheels is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unloaded I drive faster, between 70 to 75 MPH and get 14MPG.
 
  #21  
Old 03-13-2009, 12:58 PM
ciscofreak's Avatar
ciscofreak
ciscofreak is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 262
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by KIOTI
Don't forget to take the 8k trailer in there. The 33-1/2 was everything truck, trailer, and payload.
I was running a 2004 Chevy and I ran the same trip although I was or should I say got caught running 29,500 but I was getting 16-18 mpg's
I know it was pre emissions but still 5mpg and running out of power.
Granted I only run that heavy half the time but I would be happy with at least 10mpg.

Even just running my truck alone down the interstate I can't even stay in the 10mpg range.
.... Our 450 with 4.30s gets 8 to 9 towing 19K over the flatlands of Eastern Washington. You're smoking crack trying to get people here to believe you got 16-18 towing almost 30K. Could you actually tell that to somebody in person and hold a straight face?
 
  #22  
Old 03-13-2009, 01:10 PM
KIOTI's Avatar
KIOTI
KIOTI is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ciscofreak
.... Our 450 with 4.30s gets 8 to 9 towing 19K over the flatlands of Eastern Washington. You're smoking crack trying to get people here to believe you got 16-18 towing almost 30K. Could you actually tell that to somebody in person and hold a straight face?
Yes I would tell you to your face and one better My old Chevy showed up at my place last night with it's new owner turns out a local bought it so one better mouth O mighty why don't you come by here and I will show you in person!
Dude I have nothing to lie about period.
I had an edge jucie box in it and on the 2nd setting the truck will get that milage all day long loaded. Let not be idiots here it would not get that up hills.
 
  #23  
Old 03-13-2009, 02:25 PM
sawtooth's Avatar
sawtooth
sawtooth is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: nc
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have 3 Chevy durajunks in my family. 2002, 2004, 2007. My brother and father like theirs ok but none of them do better than 19-20 unloaded with programmers. Fully loaded they are in the 10-12mpg range. So go back to school and get a calculator.
 
  #24  
Old 03-13-2009, 02:51 PM
KIOTI's Avatar
KIOTI
KIOTI is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sawtooth
We have 3 Chevy durajunks in my family. 2002, 2004, 2007. My brother and father like theirs ok but none of them do better than 19-20 unloaded with programmers. Fully loaded they are in the 10-12mpg range. So go back to school and get a calculator.

Like I said the Chevy is around my neck of the woods again so unless your coming out to see for youself I have nothing more to say to you about the Chevy.
The topic was about my for not my Chevy.
 
  #25  
Old 03-13-2009, 04:37 PM
ruschejj's Avatar
ruschejj
ruschejj is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Greenwood, SC
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Here is my experience, all weights GVW assuming my 250 weighs in at 8000 (people, toolbox loaded and lots of stuff)

16ft tag along cargo trailer, GVW 13,000 = 11-12 mpg average
20ft tag along cargo trailer, GVW 16,000 = 10-11 mpg average
36ft fifth wheel cargo trailer, GVW 23,000 = 9-10 mpg average

figures using the truck "lie-o-meter" that people call it
interstate, city, and 55 mph state highways included
I always drive the posted speed limits and don't drag race
I always use ULSD, could be an issue for some folks who forget to pay attention to that
Tire pressures at the max

My experience with an '05 Duramax 3500 dually with Superchips programmer at level 2 for towing? Virtually the same. It had a lower rear end gear so starting from a stop was easier, mpg's all within 2 mpg. No way ever saw high teens with ANY trailer.

Take it for what it's worth. I'm giving you numbers based on 800-1000 mile weekly runs.
 
  #26  
Old 03-13-2009, 04:44 PM
sawtooth's Avatar
sawtooth
sawtooth is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: nc
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You probably didnt think about it but the chevy has smaller tires which also help the ratio. Keep in mind that in the past chevy basically uses one very small tire size. So if they said 3.73 then thats what was felt on the aspault. However, if Ford says 3.73 then thats with thier smallest tire size. Since Ford has several options for tires and wheels most people end up with larger diameter tires thus leading to less than 3.73 on the final drive ratio.
 
  #27  
Old 03-13-2009, 04:46 PM
ruschejj's Avatar
ruschejj
ruschejj is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Greenwood, SC
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
KIOTI, are you telling us everything about your '04 chev? I KNOW this thread is not about your Chev. but your MPG's are impossible to compare with the 6.4 performance.

You mentioned a tuner. Did you run a Banks system or something like that too? How much did you mod the Duramax you had? Did you mod the Allison? The guys here don't like it when I say that the Allison was a better feeling trans. than the Torqshift I have now.

I would say that you are justified in being frustrated with your MPG situation but there is NO way you can expect the '09 Isuzu, International, or Cummins diesels to give you upper teens with that much weight behind them. Sorry for the bad news.
 
  #28  
Old 03-13-2009, 04:48 PM
ruschejj's Avatar
ruschejj
ruschejj is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Greenwood, SC
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Sawtooth, you're right. The 3500 I had was a 16" tire, my 250 is an 18".

No slack 'round here!
 
  #29  
Old 03-13-2009, 08:26 PM
patrickke's Avatar
patrickke
patrickke is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lexington,Ky / Owensboro
Posts: 1,637
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
guys dont bite my head off when i say this...Maybe (and I say maybe) this chevy was actually a good one (i know that sounds far-fetched) and maybe he was super easy on it and babied it...btw Kioti can you tell me again which truck you had? Was it a dually? What was the gearing? and what besides the programmer had you done to it? I'm kinda trying to play devils advocate on this....Rick seems like a really nice guy Maybe he babied this truck and the 450 really isn't broke in and maybe it has some underlying problems that need to be cured
 
  #30  
Old 03-13-2009, 08:46 PM
soliver789's Avatar
soliver789
soliver789 is offline
New User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I couldn't even get the Duramax guys to believe 16-18 mpg's pulling a load was possible. I mentioned this on a D-Max site and everyone there called BS also. Every Tuner, Programmer, or Mod out there was mentioned but, no one could claim mileage even close to that. Even pulling half the weight 12 seemed to be the highest.
 


Quick Reply: I think I might sell it!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 AM.