Jet-A1 as cheap alternative Diesel fuel.
#1
Jet-A1 as cheap alternative Diesel fuel.
Hi Fella's I'm new to this forum! "Contaminated" Jet-A1 is available very cheaply from many airplane maintenance facilities in large quantities (from hundreds to thousands of gals). I have been running a Merc 300D and truck for the last 12 years (380K miles) exclusively on Jet-A1 mixed with 2% engine oil.
Is anyone here interested in discussing the tech implications or have experience themselves in its long term use?
Have a nice day
Colin
Is anyone here interested in discussing the tech implications or have experience themselves in its long term use?
Have a nice day
Colin
#3
#4
Hi Fella's I'm new to this forum! "Contaminated" Jet-A1 is available very cheaply from many airplane maintenance facilities in large quantities (from hundreds to thousands of gals). I have been running a Merc 300D and truck for the last 12 years (380K miles) exclusively on Jet-A1 mixed with 2% engine oil.
Is anyone here interested in discussing the tech implications or have experience themselves in its long term use?
Have a nice day
Colin
Is anyone here interested in discussing the tech implications or have experience themselves in its long term use?
Have a nice day
Colin
#5
Certainly. The Military in Iraq and Afghanistan use a single fuel, JP8, in all Aircraft and diesel powered vehicles and ground equipment. It should be noted that in the tests quoted below they were using “straight” JP8 (Jet-A1) without any additives to enhance lubricity. All pumps would have been in-line or rotary as common-rail electronic injection was not in vogue at that time. I know of only one person using Jet-A1 on common-rail using 2% oil mix and after 28,000ml have so far had no pump or injector issues. I would be most interested in hearing from anyone here using it on common-rail.
My own experience is limited to inline pumps and I am satisfied that a 2% mix is more than adequate lube for the metering elements and injectors. I can concur with all the findings of the report below.
The Reality of the Single-Fuel Concept
Testing and Field Trials
…….Users expressed concerns about using JP8 as a substitute for diesel fuel. These concerns included whether JP8 would burn hotter, if it would increase fuel consumption, and if it would be compatible with existing systems. As a result, the Army conducted many tests in the laboratory and on engine dynamometers, in addition to field and fleet tests, to validate using aviation kerosene turbine fuels in diesel engines and to dispel concerns. [Dynamometers measure mechanical power and assess engine durability and performance.]
Of the many successful fleet tests, one was particularly noteworthy. This 10,000-mile durability test was conducted with several commercial utility cargo vehicles (CUCVs) at the General Motors Desert Proving Ground in Mesa, Arizona, where they were exposed to round-the-clock operations in continuously hot climates. The test revealed no significant impacts on vehicle performance or fuel-injection pump wear, and no measured differences in engine operating temperatures were noted, which dispelled the fears of engines overheating because of supposedly hotter burning fuels.
One of the more significant and comprehensive tests of JP8 was a field de-monstration conducted at Fort Bliss, Texas, from October 1988 through July 1991. This field demonstration in-volved about 2,800 diesel-powered vehicles and pieces of equipment that consumed over 4.7 million gallons of JP8. The demonstration proved successful: no catastrophic failures were attributed to JP8. In fact, no major differences in procurement costs, fuel consumption, oil change intervals, or component replacements were identified when compared to historical data for the same fleet of vehicles and equipment using diesel fuel.
Easier if you know somebody in the Aviation maintenance business but otherwise talk to the manager and neg.
My own experience is limited to inline pumps and I am satisfied that a 2% mix is more than adequate lube for the metering elements and injectors. I can concur with all the findings of the report below.
The Reality of the Single-Fuel Concept
Testing and Field Trials
…….Users expressed concerns about using JP8 as a substitute for diesel fuel. These concerns included whether JP8 would burn hotter, if it would increase fuel consumption, and if it would be compatible with existing systems. As a result, the Army conducted many tests in the laboratory and on engine dynamometers, in addition to field and fleet tests, to validate using aviation kerosene turbine fuels in diesel engines and to dispel concerns. [Dynamometers measure mechanical power and assess engine durability and performance.]
Of the many successful fleet tests, one was particularly noteworthy. This 10,000-mile durability test was conducted with several commercial utility cargo vehicles (CUCVs) at the General Motors Desert Proving Ground in Mesa, Arizona, where they were exposed to round-the-clock operations in continuously hot climates. The test revealed no significant impacts on vehicle performance or fuel-injection pump wear, and no measured differences in engine operating temperatures were noted, which dispelled the fears of engines overheating because of supposedly hotter burning fuels.
One of the more significant and comprehensive tests of JP8 was a field de-monstration conducted at Fort Bliss, Texas, from October 1988 through July 1991. This field demonstration in-volved about 2,800 diesel-powered vehicles and pieces of equipment that consumed over 4.7 million gallons of JP8. The demonstration proved successful: no catastrophic failures were attributed to JP8. In fact, no major differences in procurement costs, fuel consumption, oil change intervals, or component replacements were identified when compared to historical data for the same fleet of vehicles and equipment using diesel fuel.
Easier if you know somebody in the Aviation maintenance business but otherwise talk to the manager and neg.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#11
#12
Hi Fella's I'm new to this forum! "Contaminated" Jet-A1 is available very cheaply from many airplane maintenance facilities in large quantities (from hundreds to thousands of gals). I have been running a Merc 300D and truck for the last 12 years (380K miles) exclusively on Jet-A1 mixed with 2% engine oil.
Is anyone here interested in discussing the tech implications or have experience themselves in its long term use?
Have a nice day
Colin
Is anyone here interested in discussing the tech implications or have experience themselves in its long term use?
Have a nice day
Colin
Welcome!
#13
#14
...and cant be reused because of some federal regulations?
I believe that use in a C/R would be less problematic than in the rotary V pumps as distribution is electronic with none of the sliding parts that need lube as in the Vee's. But that's just my opinion.
have a nice day
#15
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Plano TX and Brentwood TN
Posts: 10,626
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Unless your putting this in a 6.4, your not putting it in a common rail truck. With regard to a Ford truck anyway. Have to make sure I add that considering this is the general diesel forum.