4R100 2WD to 4WD
#1
4R100 2WD to 4WD
I bought a 4R100 2WD transmission the other day to use as a core to replace the high-mileage tranny in my 2001 F250 4X4 7.3L. This tranny came from a 2001 E350 Diesel ambulance, and I think it has been replaced because the build date is from 1999. I like the idea of starting with a good running transmission, rather than a failure.
My intended use is daily driving with a well-stocked (meaning heavy) service body and occasionally towing a trailer locally. The trailer will vary between 6,000 and 15,000 lbs. I live in a rural area near a small town and do not do much freeway driving. The truck is now stock, and I might later add a 6637, Walker BTM, and a tuner, but not expect to use more than 60 Tow and 80 Econ settings.
I intend to upgrade to with the following: Transgo Tugger kit, billet multi-disc heavy duty torque converter, upgraded center support kit with snap ring and shims, Torrington thrust bearings, Upgraded clutch packs (more plates), 45-element sprag, Improved snap rings, and a pump boost valve kit. This should be similar to a Monster Box, without the hardened input shaft. My target is a reliable unit that can withstand a reasonable (+80 hp) amount of power. What do you guys think?
The seller threw in a E4OD from a 1997 F350 DRW that suffered the front pump drive shaft shearing off. It has the deep oil pan, short output shaft and aluminum tail housing the same as a 4X4. If these parts don't interchange with my 4R100 I will sell that one for a core and buy the proper pan, shaft and housing. Does anyone know if it is worth taking the E4OD apart to check?
Thanks for the help.
My intended use is daily driving with a well-stocked (meaning heavy) service body and occasionally towing a trailer locally. The trailer will vary between 6,000 and 15,000 lbs. I live in a rural area near a small town and do not do much freeway driving. The truck is now stock, and I might later add a 6637, Walker BTM, and a tuner, but not expect to use more than 60 Tow and 80 Econ settings.
I intend to upgrade to with the following: Transgo Tugger kit, billet multi-disc heavy duty torque converter, upgraded center support kit with snap ring and shims, Torrington thrust bearings, Upgraded clutch packs (more plates), 45-element sprag, Improved snap rings, and a pump boost valve kit. This should be similar to a Monster Box, without the hardened input shaft. My target is a reliable unit that can withstand a reasonable (+80 hp) amount of power. What do you guys think?
The seller threw in a E4OD from a 1997 F350 DRW that suffered the front pump drive shaft shearing off. It has the deep oil pan, short output shaft and aluminum tail housing the same as a 4X4. If these parts don't interchange with my 4R100 I will sell that one for a core and buy the proper pan, shaft and housing. Does anyone know if it is worth taking the E4OD apart to check?
Thanks for the help.
Last edited by JockD; 02-17-2009 at 09:51 PM. Reason: some items did not show in post.
#3
#5
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Damon (South East Texas)
Posts: 8,298
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
I bought a 4R100 2WD transmission the other day to use as a core to replace the high-mileage tranny in my 2001 F250 4X4 7.3L. This tranny came from a 2001 E350 Diesel ambulance, and I think it has been replaced because the build date is from 1999. I like the idea of starting with a good running transmission, rather than a failure.
My intended use is daily driving with a well-stocked (meaning heavy) service body and occasionally towing a trailer locally. The trailer will vary between 6,000 and 15,000 lbs. I live in a rural area near a small town and do not do much freeway driving. The truck is now stock, and I might later add a 6637, Walker BTM, and a tuner, but not expect to use more than 60 Tow and 80 Econ settings.
I intend to upgrade to with the following: Transgo Tugger kit, billet multi-disc heavy duty torque converter, upgraded center support kit with snap ring and shims, Torrington thrust bearings, Upgraded clutch packs (more plates), 45-element sprag, Improved snap rings, and a pump boost valve kit. This should be similar to a Monster Box, without the hardened input shaft. My target is a reliable unit that can withstand a reasonable (+80 hp) amount of power. What do you guys think?
The seller threw in a E4OD from a 1997 F350 DRW that suffered the front pump drive shaft shearing off. It has the deep oil pan, short output shaft and aluminum tail housing the same as a 4X4. If these parts don't interchange with my 4R100 I will sell that one for a core and buy the proper pan, shaft and housing. Does anyone know if it is worth taking the E4OD apart to check?
Thanks for the help.
My intended use is daily driving with a well-stocked (meaning heavy) service body and occasionally towing a trailer locally. The trailer will vary between 6,000 and 15,000 lbs. I live in a rural area near a small town and do not do much freeway driving. The truck is now stock, and I might later add a 6637, Walker BTM, and a tuner, but not expect to use more than 60 Tow and 80 Econ settings.
I intend to upgrade to with the following: Transgo Tugger kit, billet multi-disc heavy duty torque converter, upgraded center support kit with snap ring and shims, Torrington thrust bearings, Upgraded clutch packs (more plates), 45-element sprag, Improved snap rings, and a pump boost valve kit. This should be similar to a Monster Box, without the hardened input shaft. My target is a reliable unit that can withstand a reasonable (+80 hp) amount of power. What do you guys think?
The seller threw in a E4OD from a 1997 F350 DRW that suffered the front pump drive shaft shearing off. It has the deep oil pan, short output shaft and aluminum tail housing the same as a 4X4. If these parts don't interchange with my 4R100 I will sell that one for a core and buy the proper pan, shaft and housing. Does anyone know if it is worth taking the E4OD apart to check?
Thanks for the help.
#6
#7
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Damon (South East Texas)
Posts: 8,298
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
The output shafts would need to be swapped, also.
Trending Topics
#8
I basicly did the same upgrades to my original '01 4R100, except it added the hardened input shaft and TC lock-up kit. It should hold up fine with these upgrades. The '01 4R100 should also have a steel tail housing vs the aluminum one on the '97 E4OD. JMHO, I would opt to install the steel one from the OEM trans. Other than that, you should be able make one good one out of the two. PM me, if you like.
Now I know you are using the Transgo Tugger kit and have that dailed in to work perfect for you. But I myself do not like the Tugger pump modds. I think the Sonnax pump modds are better design and easier to do. And since I am talking pump modds I want to throw out there that you have to decide do you want a the PWM or the Non PWM coverter clutch control valve. Because you run the Non PWM and get nice tight lock up but I am running the Sonnax PWM which even on stock tunes give me a lock up almost like a NonPWM.
http://www.sonnax.com/system/announcement/36424-08K.pdf
#9
Ditto. Must be done when converting a 7.3L van to 4x4. Talk to a 4x4 converter in your area for who best to do it.
(I have also heard that the bell housings are different but cannot verify.)
Master Mark K. is also correct that you can (and in my opinion should) use your 4x4 pan with a drain plug on the 2WD trans. BUT you MUST also use the deep 4x4 filter with that pan (and not continue to use the shallower 2WD filter). (Mark and others helped me through this a year ago last July. Don't re-ignite the war on what Mercon variation to use...)
(I have also heard that the bell housings are different but cannot verify.)
Master Mark K. is also correct that you can (and in my opinion should) use your 4x4 pan with a drain plug on the 2WD trans. BUT you MUST also use the deep 4x4 filter with that pan (and not continue to use the shallower 2WD filter). (Mark and others helped me through this a year ago last July. Don't re-ignite the war on what Mercon variation to use...)
#10
I find it slightly amusing that almost 7 1/2 years after Ford put out the TSB that Mercon was being superseded with Mercon V, some people will still argue not to use Merc V because of what their owners manual states, even when told about the TSB.
Stewart
Stewart
#13
I am kidding. This is only humor. Because I am one of the persons you are referring to and had a heated discussion on the forum with Mark K. (who is an expert on the matter) when I was armed with the info in my manual supplemented with what the teenage counter person told me at Napa.
So my foot fits that shoe perfectly...
So my foot fits that shoe perfectly...
#14
If you do have a stock original 01 just change it out during the rebuild.
#15
I knew you was being funny-funny, but I didn't remember you were one of the people that hesitated using the Merc V.
I really am slightly amused when it happens. I used to be completely amused, but I guess time has worn that down.
The amusement comes from the point when my minds eye see's the light bulb go off in a persons head when they understand we're not full of it, and they believe us.
Stewart